Filosoofis
Banned
Awards
It is obito's sharingan and rikudou's chakra. But kakashi used it. I also think it is a BS asspull
How is itachi perfect susanoo canon ??
- Thread starter Madarar
- Start date
Filosoofis
Banned
Awards
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
Look at all the but-hurt in one thread lmao how can do deny the creator kishi the authenticity on his own work, you working at Viz Media & Shonen Jump now who are you to doubt his work?
CalamityHeart
Member
No one's saying it's not authentic. It's obviously Kishi's authentic work.
It's just not canon.
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
Canon is the authenticity of the original creator if it isn't creator by the original creator it's non canon.
CalamityHeart
Member
Canon means that it has a place in the actual official source material. Things in the story of the Naruto manga are canon. Things that are purely exclusive to the games, or have no place in the actual story, even if they were designed by Kishimoto, are not canon.
You must be registered for see images
This was drawn by Kishi. Is this canon? Why or why not?
Last edited:
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
Canon means it's created by the original creator so why would people ask kishimoto questions about specific parts in his series if it's going to have no value in the main story wouldn't that just be a waste of time?
You do know that this isn't the original story of naruto right?? does this mean the story we've been reading the whole time isn't canon?
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Why have we wasted reading non canon material this wholetime.
Universal Enlightenment
Active member
Awards
CalamityHeart
Member
Itachi and Shisui's PS are nothing more than fanservice for the game. They aren't meaningful to the story at all, so yeah, in that sense, they are a "waste of time", I guess. *shrug*
There's nothing viably connecting their PS to the story. Shisui canonically died before he could even use the regular Susanoo, so his PS can't be canon. Itachi never used PS in the original story, either, nor did he imply that he ever could use it. It could be considered authentic that that's what their Perfect Susanoos would look like had they actually been awakened, but they were never actually awakened, so they aren't canon. They can't be treated like abilities they actually possess.
:wut: :wut: :wut:
Seriously...? What does that have to do with literally anything I was saying? Of course the original pilot manga isn't canon. Did my point not connect with you?
Original Naruto pilot (drawn by Kishi) = not a part of the official Naruto story ∴ not canon
Medieval fantasy Naruto cover (drawn by Kishi) = not a part of the official Naruto story ∴ not canon
Itachi and Shisui's Perfect Susanoos (drawn by Kishi) = not a part of the official Naruto story ∴ not canon
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
i'm going by your logic you do know that Naruto pilot was the original Naruto manga right released in 1997 Debuting in Akamaru Jump ? How isn't canon but it's the original? The manga we've been reading the whole time was first published by Shueisha in 1999 in the 43rd issue of Japan's Shōnen Jump magazine coming after the original. All of a sudden you choosing and picking parts you want to approve
lelerskates
Banned
It's actually Kakashi's. Or do you not like looking at the pictures? It even has Kakashi's scar. Youre bad at trolling.
CalamityHeart
Member
Thanks for the factoids, I guess... The thing you're missing is I'm talking about the official Naruto manga, all 700 chapters of which you can read on this very site. The original Naruto pilot that you're talking about is not canon to the official story. I'm not picking and choosing anything; my point just seems to be going over your head somehow.
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
it's the original the the first official one nothings going over my head your choosing by your base on your own opinion, when i put it by the standards all of a sudden that rule doesn't apply let me quote you.
The original series was created in 1997 so by your standard if it's the original source material wouldn't that be canon?
CalamityHeart
Member
Oh, is that what you're nitpicking at?
I've clearly been talking about the actual official Naruto manga this whole time, but if it means that much to you, I'll edit that post and make it clearer.
My point still stands, by the way.
UchiGod Itachi
Active member
lmao you have no point you just change your define opinion on something when i held it up to your standard of definition.Oh, is that what you're nitpicking at?
I've clearly been talking about the actual official Naruto manga this whole time, but if it means that much to you, I'll edit that post and make it clearer.
My point still stands, by the way.