How do we know if the stuff in the anime isn't canon?

[SenseiSama]

You interpret manga details in a wrong way and don't let me start with your mistakes , Hagoromo had Sharingan

You keep saying that but have no proof of it in the manga, anyways I gave up trying to argue against your delusion

 

[Sakura Michiko]

that is a quote from Itachi, unless you already know that. People consider what Kishi didn't write/get involved in non-canon which I guess rules out fillers. Sometimes Kishi has incorporated fillers like Raiga, the kiba swords, and possibly the designs of Pakura and Gari.

Itachi is solo god.

 

[iNotorious]

If fillers make them happy, let them be. There's no harm but when it comes to debate with facts, you slap them with'em mangafux.

 

[Holy God]

What fillers are u talking about? If you want to talk about fillers like sora guren yota and these stuff creating imconsistencies im okay , but this recent kaguya and ashura indra arc didn't' create inconsistencies they were explained in episode 464


You interpret manga details in a wrong way and don't let me start with your mistakes , Hagoromo had Sharingan

I was including these current Sage of Six Paths episodes. There are inconsistencies and episode 464 from what I read on Wikipedia does not explain them.

 

[Natsu Shazneel]

If its not in the manga its not canon.

 

[Yatori]

If its not in the manga its not canon.

This ^^

 

[Haloguy2710]

If Kishi didn't write it, it's filler