It's okay, you can be disrespectful.
I'll be honest - the reason why you can't tell whether or not I'm serious is because you're stupid and can't grasp the most basic elements of reading comprehension.
Please, tell me how Sasuke embodies Yin.
There are multiple facets to the yin-yang theming in the story. Naruto is, in a way, a Yin character. He was not born with natural talent. That is a Yin characteristic. But his personality is most certainly a Yang personality.
Yin and Yang are constantly shifting and changing into each other. Inaction (Wu) becomes an action of its own (Wei). Action flows into non-action. It is the goal of every Taoist master to control the shift from Yin to Yang and Yang to Yin - thereby mastering the art of "Wei Wu Wei" or "Action Without Effort."
Sasuke's personality and character is all about action. He was born with natural talent. He is an imbalanced (and thus, unhappy) character. Madara and Sasuke can be thought of as extreme embodiments of Yang.
I suspect the Sage's brother had two children, as well - and one of them was born as the extreme embodiment of Yin. The theory that Jashin is this individual is an interesting (and likely accurate) one. The odd abilities of Jashinism would indicate an extreme embracing of Yin characteristics.
Naruto and Hinata represent the balanced, complementary characters. They shift through Yin and Yang traits (though Hinata is primarily Yin while Naruto is primarily Yang) and when one is portrayed as Yin, the other is portrayed as Yang.
It's really not that difficult to understand.
Sakura doesn't even need to enter the discussion.
Sakura was included as a sort of tsundere character that Shoen manga likes to have. I'm not really sure why she's there, and Kishimoto seems to have similar difficulties wrapping his head around Sakura's existence.
Hinata, on the other hand:
You must be registered for see images
Before there was a Naruto manga - you already had Hinata being designed as the Yin complement to Naruto.
I suppose that makes her 'love fodder' among the intellectually disenfranchised.
See above.
You're clearly not getting this whole 'theme' thing, are you?
That was symbolic. Hinata fell because Naruto had fallen.
Again... what are they teaching you kids in school these days? Number lines would be a challenging reading comprehension assignment, from what I'm seeing.
You seem to forget what happened in chapters more than three weeks old. You see... Hinata hadn't been depicted in a single panel since around the first fifty chapters of Part II. Then she shows up during the Pain invasion.
Then we don't see much of her. "She's just fodder, not important."
Short little scene during the Zetsu insanity. "What was that for? Fodder, be gone!"
Then she shows up and Talk-No-Jutsu's Naruto. "... WTF!? Kishimoto is such a *****!"
Hinata will show up again, be incredibly relevant to the plot, and you will simply continue to write it off as Kishimoto 'trolling.'
If your perspective had any relevance, whatsoever, it would be able to predict, at the very least, the plot relationship between characters.
