Hidden Viral Gene Discovered in GMO Crops

YowYan

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
15,124
Kin
1,244💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
You must be registered for see images


Another reason for you to avoid health depleting genetically modified organisms is here. A recent discovery of a hidden viral gene deep within genetically modified crops has us asking more questions. Despite numerous studies, experts and scientists speaking out about the dangers of GMOs to human health, the United States government, and other major manipulating organizations like the council on foreign relations continue to support and promote GMOs.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) researchers have discovered a previously unknown viral gene that is known as “Gene VI.” (1) It’s found in most prominent GMO crops, and can disrupt the biological functions within living organisms. What do you expect? Genetically Modified Organisms contain a number of cell altering chemicals, that’s what chemicals do. Don’t forget about the chemicals used to spray the crops as well. Certain corn crops were found to contain the gene that creates physical mutation within the body. Roundup-Ready soybeans were also found to contain the gene. Don’t forget about NK603, which was recently linked to the development of mass tumors in rats. (2)

This Gene helps to assemble virus particles that inhibit the natural defense of the cellular system and produces proteins that are harmful. The most common genetic regulatory sequence in commercial GMOs also encodes a significant fragment of this viral gene. The presence of this “hidden” gene is likely to result in unintended phenotypic changes (DNA mutations.) Of the 86 different transgenic events (unique insertions of foreign DNA) commercialized and mass marketed today, 54 in the United States contain some of the harmful Gene V1 within them.

Gene VI was also discovered to be an inhibitor of RNA silencing, which is a mechanism for the control of gene expression. It’s important for antiviral defense in both animals and plants. Because of this discovery, scientists are concerned that Gene V1 will lead to aberrant gene expression in GMO crop plants, with unknown consequences. The hidden gene will also interfere with the ability of plants to defend themselves against viral pathogens.

Although naysayers may be highly skeptical of this information, it’s not hard to believe. Multinational food and biotech organizations have more authority than the government itself. Not to long ago, the Monsanto Protection Act was signed. The Monsanto Protection Act allows Monsanto to override United States federal courts on the issue of planting experimental genetically engineered crops all across the US. The government has no power whatsoever to stop Monsanto and other biotechnology corporations from planting and harvesting. After Obama signed H.R. 933, the provision was final, there can be no litigation against these corporations at all. Corrupt food corporations are now allowed to plant and sell their genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and genetically engineered (GE) seeds. It wasn’t long ago that Monsanto rejected multiple studies on GMO crop risk. We are seeing the power of the fact that multinational corporations own the government. You can read more about this here.

There is no justifiable reason for the consumption of GMOs. The days in which the human race accepts the explanations given to it by it’s governing authorities that control the food, health, energy and financial industries are numbered, we are waking up and sharing information. Alternative media outlets are becoming more popular by the day. A good way to determine the truth of something is to look at a variety of sources, not just one! Dentists for example, they are trained to only study one source of information, and it’s anything that comes from their respective dental associations, like the American Dental Association. The same can be said for doctors, who only examine the material given to them by their medical associations, without further investigation. The time for critical thinking and inquiry is here.

Thanks for reading, much love.

Sources:

(1)

(2)

(2)





 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Christ, dude...

Do you read your own sources?

From:

"Assessing the allergenicity of a transgenic plant is a complex
task, and there have been several consensus documents and
scientific opinions regarding such assessments of allergenicity.
19,20,23,25-28 Here, two P35S variants (the -1329 and the short
double enhancer variant, respectively) were screened for the presence
of ORFs that possibly encode allergenic and toxic proteins.
Different databases and search algorithms were employed. No similarities were shown to known allergens using the different
algorithms. The AlgPred SMV algorithms indicated that
the ORF-encoding portion of the P6 yields a possible allergen.
AlgPred is based on dipeptide composition and calculates the
frequency of all possible dipeptide combinations. This approach
is theoretical and needs to be used in combination with other
methods. As no scientific literature has been reported on any
allergenic properties of CaMV and no similarities have been
shown to know allergens, it can be concluded that the P6 protein
is most likely not an allergen. In addition, a toxin database was
constructed, and no significant sequence similarity with the P35S
variants was detected. These data suggest that the P35S variants
do not contain ORFs that encode for proteins that have allergenic
or toxic properties.

.
.
.

In conclusion, different P35S variants are in use to express
proteins in transgenic plants. Here, we detailed the overlap of
P35S with the coding sequence of gene VI. Our bioinformatic
analyses indicated that no ORFs are present in the P35S that
are similar to known toxic and allergenic proteins. Possible unintended
effects that are linked to the use of extended versions of
the P35S have been determined. The -343 variant, identified by
Odell and colleagues,22 contains all of the necessary elements for
full promoter activity and does not appear to result in the presence
of an ORF with functional domains, rendering it and its
related variants the most appropriate promoter variants for avoiding
unintended effects."


In other words... They investigated and found no signs of toxic or allergenic compounds being mutated into expression in the plants. Other research they did suggested that the idea that the mutation -could- lead to expression was not backed by the research, as partial mutations were observed and the mechanics involved precluded successful expression.
 
Top