Government arrrests online anti-Obama protesters without trial

MickNerks

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Messages
6,585
Kin
77💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Im pretty sure this is fake. If you actually did your research you would know that you CAN be arrested before you have a trail, but you cant be convicted of a crime without first being judged by a jury of your peers.

And this is just the media's way of catching the attention of the Obama haters, because they know they live off this stuff. Obama is far from the worst president we have ever had. And so far the G.O.P has not given and real serious candidates that could do a better job.
 

rollin

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
8,794
Kin
25💸
Kumi
24💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
if it's true or not it's not like anyone's going to do anything about it sadly mostshpeople will want it to happen thinking it's a good thing or straight up deny it or not care
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
It's more free than before, at least there aren't as much people dying in the streets cuz they don't have money to pay the healthcare
It's the most horrible thing ever done to our nation since the creation of the Federal Reserve (which still trumps it in terms of pure vileness).

First - it's not free.

Second, it's not "more free."

I work in Dialysis. You know - the machines that clean your blood when your kidneys stop working?

I know of several Dialysis clinics that have closed their doors as a direct result of 'Obamacare.' They simply cannot afford to operate at the prices offered. Hemodialysis is going to become a 'premium' service that is unaffordable by the general public, simply because of the overhead that goes into staff support (especially if minimum wage goes up to $15 an hour).

Medications our clinics would have covered, before, are now all to be covered under the stock per-treatment rate (no charges to other insurance firms and no separate medication costs covered by medicare).

Now, there are forms of dialysis available for the home - PD being one of them - but it is not well suited for most of the patients with diabetic-induced kidney failure and does not come with the direct medical staff support that hemodialysis does (which is why Americans prefer it even over solutions like Baxter's Next Stage home hemodialysis system).

To put it to you this way - people on Hemodialysis need to sit in a chair and have their blood circulated through a machine for about four hours of the day, three times per week. If not - they die.

While I am one of those "evil free market people" - I understand that these people are in one hell of a pickle, as that is a lot of time to take out of the week simply to stay alive. To make matters worse - just to break even with the cost of treatment, you're looking at around $200 per treatment depending upon the facility (since operational overhead has to be factored in - the more seats are filled at any given time, the lower the cost per treatment - the fewer patients, the more overhead falls on each individual patient - expect future dialysis clinics to become large centralized operations where patients have to be bussed from hours away to receive treatment as opposed to the local clinics with ten or so chairs that are a few minutes away). That means it is impractical for the working person to be on Dialysis and 'pay their way' through the treatment.

Now, the medical world is always in flux. If we were to deregulate (which, honestly, don't get followed anyway - more money is wasted by companies bringing in competent personnel to get them back up to state/federal standards that are obsolete or irrelevant to patient/employee safety and cleaning up after incompetent staff that knows how to make pretty (but falsified) documents than would have been saved by enforcing internal audit standards that are more than sufficient) - a lot of costs would go down. Repair parts for our machines would approach far more reasonable costs as the same motor Fresenius sells me for $180 can be had for about $30 from the same company that manufactures them under contract for Fresenius.

The $10 check-valve becomes $3. The $1000 function board becomes $150.

Same stuff. Same quality. Just no government ban-hammer busting open your skull for purchasing things outside of the monopoly.

Anyway - the point is that Dialysis is going to become a rationed service under Obamacare. It isn't free. The overweight diabetics (who have had leg amputations because of diabetic issues) who need to be hoisted into and out of chairs with lifts rated for 800lbs?

Are going to simply not be treated. Which means they are going to die. Unless they can pay the $400/treatment that is going to come with the impending increase in minimum wage and healthcare costs on a whole (the nation is dealing with a shortage of saline at the moment. This is artificially imposed by the FDA - since regulations on Saline have forced production into Mexico, where it now has to undergo FDA inspection. Domestic saline production exists - but costs up to $11 per bag as opposed to around $4 per bag from Mexico).

The younger people or people deemed of high enough value for retention or who are part of a demographic historically responding well to kidney transplants (with a common set of blood-types for organ matching) will likely be forced onto a home program due to its lower operational overhead. While home dialysis is certainly more convenient (considering you can do it overnight while you sleep or during mundane activities - theoretically you could even do it in an office setting at work) - and because of this tends to have better long-term outcomes among people who respond well to training - it is also not going to be a choice of what medical care to receive. You will be told - and there are quite a few people who are made sick by the reigning forms of home dialysis solutions.

I also come from the military - so I know what universal healthcare looks like.

"Ibuprofen and water." That is the military's healthcare system. Unless you need some kind of surgery - and then you are usually sent through two or three review boards before being approved for a surgery to take place three months after the board date. You do not get to choose a doctor.

Of course - this system 'works' largely because the people in the military are largely under the age of 24, are forced into physical exercise and standards, and often have access to complete meals provided by the galley/mess. Generally speaking - the military population is healthy enough to shrug off anything and everything that doesn't actually break the body - and even then, we have higher than average long term success rates while in the military lifestyle.

You go to the VA to die.

If this really happend it would be on the news then Obama would be dealing with a forced impeachment where every American goes to arms and storms the White House the reason the right to bear arms was made
No, they wouldn't.

You have to understand that the media is all for the creation of a fascist dictatorship - even if they don't entirely realize that is what they are helping to create.

They like the idea of control. They are used to it - millions of things to say and they get to choose on a daily basis what is important to people.

Obama's administration will never actually be covered.

A prime example: ISIS is the group that was being supported BY OUR PRESIDENT'S ADMINISTRATION by the arms running through Benghazi.

That's right. Our president authorized the supporting of the Syrian rebels who are now destroying cities and putting people into mass graves in Iraq. The same rebels who killed our security forces and ambassador in Benghazi.

And our President's administration not only blamed it on a youtube video - but also prosecuted and arrested the director/producer of the video, knowing the attack had nothing to do with the video.

Honestly, with the size of bills these days and the way the President's administration has been authorizing itself to interpret laws - it's hard to say that the statements made by this blog are definitely untrue.

Technically, if you read the modified Patriot Act that President Obama instated - I classify as a high risk for domestic terrorism because I am a veteran. Compounding with that, I'm a Constitutionalist and I believe in the minimum necessary government. One can interpret the law that the Obama Administration would be acting within its legal bounds to nail my ass with a Predator Drone.

I imagine there are a lot of people who would merit the drone ahead of me (enough that I would microwave my smart phone and get in touch with my Ozark roots down south) - but the point still stands that they could.

And the media would find their way around the privacy settings on my facebook page and find every frustrated post I've ever made on it that makes me look like some kind of child *** offender who was itching to be some kind of Rambo-Jefferson chimera. They would probably try and spin my character to make me look like someone who was likely to go shoot up a school (because, you know, shooting fish in a barrel is a testament to 1337 skilz) - and how good it was that one of those was prevented.

You're probably looking at that with a bit of disbelief... but I've been close to a few high profile media scenes to see what the media knew and what they chose to say.

Even the dreaded "Faux News" is insanely biased toward the progressives and exists merely as an appeasement tool for the conservative leaning population to feel as though they have a voice. Notice I said progressives. It's not just the democrats - the Republicans do not stand for a reduction of government and individual liberty. Just look at how they are reacting to the Tea Party.
 
Top