watch this video it answers your question about the stone and everything elseThis does not disprove the paradox,So under the standard definition of omnipotence, he is not omnipotent. Unless you can tell me the definition you are using.
watch this video it answers your question about the stone and everything elseThis does not disprove the paradox,So under the standard definition of omnipotence, he is not omnipotent. Unless you can tell me the definition you are using.
I made another post on the previous pagewatch this video it answers your question about the stone and everything else
It disproves the notion of an omnipotent god unless people change its definitionit might just be that god is not omnipotent afterall...still doesnt disaprrove his existence though
Then again god himself states that humans cannot comprehend himI made another post on the previous page
It disproves the notion of an omnipotent god unless people change its definition
you stop picking words and read and then maybe you will understandYou just typed god can make the impossible.... possible.... and you also said it is not possible for him to lie or deny himself.......... you see the paradox right..... by your own quoting of scipture you have just proved that god can lie.........
That does not disprove the video and the paradoxThen again god himself states that humans cannot comprehend him
aren't you(human) the one who's assuming that god is not omnipotent so you're actually trying to comprehend him which is impossible according to himselfThat does not disprove the video and the paradox
true but how do you know that god sometimes doesn't intervine in your life,without you knowing it ?People can live with or without believing in god it doesn't matter.
I see this is going nowhere since you are using the too complex argument. Peacearen't you(human) the one who's assuming that god is not omnipotent so you're actually trying to comprehend him which is impossible according to himself
i guess you're right.peace to you tooI see this is going nowhere since you are using the too complex argument. Peace
There's probably a lot of things that intervine in your life. Whether the belief of god affects peoples decisions and actions is worth discussing but really there's no point in discussing whether god actually exists. There are possibilities that he could, but there are also chances that he doesn't and no one can prove it. It's never truly a fact to all of the population and it's ultimately your choice to believe.true but how do you know that god sometimes doesn't intervine in your life,without you knowing it ?
If a God really exists, I find it implausible that they would be a person.well for me the biblical god makes the most sense
You must be registered for see imageswhat about you ?
The big bang is not the creation, but the expansion of the universe.Creation is the emergence of existence itself and in order for existence itself to emerge it would have to do so from a position of non-existence. The emergence of existence from non-existence is a self-contradiction and therefore, impossible.
my religion is one of the oldest surviving religions, your's is merely a couple thousand years old. there is no "biblical god" or "muslim god" or "hindu god." if there really is a god, i think it is just God.well for me the biblical god makes the most sense
You must be registered for see imageswhat about you ?