[Discussion] Gaia Hypothesis | Is Earth An Living Organism?

Waindo

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Kin
869💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️

theguardian.com | collectivelyconscious.net
Most of us sense that the Earth is more than a sphere of rock with a thin layer of air, ocean and life covering the surface. We feel that we belong here as if this planet were indeed our home. Long ago the Greeks, thinking this way, gave to the Earth the name Gaia or, for short, Ge. In those days, science and theology were one and science, although less precise, had soul. As time passed this warm relationship faded and was replaced by the frigidity of the schoolmen. The life sciences, no longer concerned with life, fell to classifying dead things and even to vivisection. Ge was stolen from theology to become no more the root from which the disciplines of geography and geology were named. Now at last there are signs of a change. Science becomes holistic again and rediscovers soul, and theology, moved by ecumenical forces, begins to realise that Gaia is not to be subdivided for academic convenience and that Ge is much more than just a prefix.


You must be registered for see images

Earth is a perfect planet for life but, according to Gaia theory, this is no coincidence. From the moment life first appeared on Earth it has worked hard to make Earth a more comfortable place to live.

Gaia theory suggests that the Earth and its natural cycles can be thought of like a living organism. When one natural cycle starts to go out of kilter other cycles work to bring it back, continually optimising the conditions for life on Earth.

Named after the Greek Earth goddess, Gaia, the theory was developed in the 1960s by scientist Dr James Lovelock. At the time, Lovelock was working for Nasa, looking at methods of detecting life on Mars. The theory came about as a way of explaining why the Earth’s atmosphere contains high levels of nitrogen and oxygen.
Initially, Gaia theory was ignored, and then later ridiculed by scientists such as Richard Dawkins and Stephen J Gould. However, in recent times stronger evidence for the theory has emerged and Gaia has started to gain support. The theory helps to explain some of the more unusual features of planet Earth, such as why the atmosphere isn’t mostly carbon dioxide, and why the oceans aren’t more salty.

In its early years Earth’s atmosphere was mostly carbon dioxide – the product of multiple volcanic burps. It wasn’t until life arrived that the balance began to change. Bacteria produced nitrogen, an inert gas, and photosynthesising plants produced oxygen, a very reactive gas. Ever since that time, about 2,500m years ago, Earth’s atmosphere has contained significant amounts of nitrogen and oxygen, supporting life on this planet. The nitrogen helps to keep things stable, preventing oxygen levels from climbing too high and fuelling runaway fires. Meanwhile, the oxygen supports complex life.

Gaia also helps to explain how the oceans are kept in balance. Rivers dissolve salt from rocks and carry it to the ocean, yet ocean salinity has remained at about 3.4% for a very long time. It appears that the salt is removed again when water is cycled through cracks on the ocean floor. This process keeps the oceans’ salinity in balance and at a level that most lifeforms can tolerate.

These processes are not thought to be conscious ones, or to favour any one life form over another. Gaia theory simply maintains that Earth’s natural cycles work together to keep the Earth healthy and support life on Earth.

Lovelock argues that humans have now pushed Gaia to her limit. In addition to filling the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, we have hacked our way through the “lungs” of the planet (the rainforests) and driven many species to extinction. He thinks we are heading for a very warm world, where only polar regions are comfortable for most life forms. Eventually, he suspects, Gaia will pull things back into check, but it may be too late for the human race.

Feedback loops

Feedback loops often appear to keep the planet in balance. One good example of this is the way in which atmospheric carbon dioxide is kept in check. Carbon dioxide is pumped into the atmosphere by volcanoes, and removed by the weathering of rocks (encouraged by bacteria and plant roots in the soil). When it reaches the sea, the dissolved carbon dioxide is used by tiny organisms, known as coccolithophores (algae), to make their shells. When coccolithophores die they release a gas – dimethyl sulphate – which encourages the formation of clouds in the atmosphere.

When atmospheric carbon dioxide levels become too high, coccolithophores get busy, locking up more carbon dioxide in their shells and pumping dimethyl sulphate into the atmosphere when they die – producing clouds which reflect back sunlight and help the Earth to cool. Conversely, if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels become low, coccolithophores reduce their activity.

Over the past 200 years mankind has greatly increased atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and recently there has been evidence that algal blooms in the ocean are increasing. Could Gaia be trying to correct our mistake?
 

Scooby Doo

Active member
Immortal
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
45,490
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Well I've heard about this hypothesis.

And what's with you man being on a spree making threads on nature XD (Not that it's a problem, keep it up, at least they are more informative than all those transgender and religious threads).
 
Last edited:

BlacLord™

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
16,201
Kin
22💸
Kumi
12💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Gaia hypothesis is tripe.

It works on the basis that living organisms and the planet's natural resources work in sync with each other for mutual benefit but that doesn't work, as many living things have permanent detrimental effects to the planet that can't be counterbalanced. Earth is just a planet that has the conditions and resources to sustain life.

Evolution and effect are down to the MO and interaction of the living organisms that live on the planet.
 

Wabbit

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
11,335
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Idk if you are righting these on your own, if you are then you should make a blog or something. You could make profit from ads. conspiracies and these kind or theories attract lot of people.
Well I've heard abut this hypothesis.

And what's with you man being on a spree making threads on nature XD (
I suspect he is doing lot psychedelics
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
The universe is Life itself, how can you say the earth is not alive? It has a functioning internal core that generates a magnetosphere and a healthy nature .
I can say it's not alive because it's not alive. Show me proof of it being alive. Don't use evidence like what you used above. Your misunderstandings of modern science are not evidence.

Proceed.
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
You must be registered for see images
Do you have any proof that says otherwise?

Are comets and asteroids alive too? Is Mars alive as well? What about Jupiter that is a big ass ball of gas? Come on now... You're trying to tell me Earth is alive because it has a complex system of life on it.


A magnetosphere is simply the area inside of a magnetic field. So you're saying since the Earth has a magnetosphere(A magnetic field), it is alive? Then I ask you again, what about Jupiter? Saturn? Uranus? Neptune? All alive or...? So are you saying they need to have life on them to be alive? Are we talking complex life like us or microbes? Europa likely has microbes under its icy surface, but has no inner core to produce a magnetic field. So is Europa the moon alive or not?


Dr. Tachyon.
 

Uzumaki Macho

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
6,663
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Do you have any proof that says otherwise?

Are comets and asteroids alive too? Is Mars alive as well? What about Jupiter that is a big ass ball of gas? Come on now... You're trying to tell me Earth is alive because it has a complex system of life on it.


A magnetosphere is simply the area inside of a magnetic field. So you're saying since the Earth has a magnetosphere(A magnetic field), it is alive? Then I ask you again, what about Jupiter? Saturn? Uranus? Neptune? All alive or...? So are you saying they need to have life on them to be alive? Are we talking complex life like us or microbes? Europa likely has microbes under its icy surface, but has no inner core to produce a magnetic field. So is Europa the moon alive or not?


Dr. Tachyon.
lol this guy. Obviously the Earth is alive since it has life on it. Also, dead bodies are alive since they have bacteria on them. /sarcasm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scooby Doo

Nobel

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
3,263
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Do you have any proof that says otherwise?

Come on now... You're trying to tell me Earth is alive because it has a complex system of life on it.


A magnetosphere is simply the area inside of a magnetic field. So you're saying since the Earth has a magnetosphere(A magnetic field), it is alive? Then I ask you again, what about Jupiter? Saturn? Uranus? Neptune? All alive or...? So are you saying they need to have life on them to be alive? Are we talking complex life like us or microbes? Europa likely has microbes under its icy surface, but has no inner core to produce a magnetic field. So is Europa the moon alive or not?


Dr. Tachyon.
You must be registered for see images


:lmao: The magnetic field is a simply way of me showing that the planet is not dead. The core is active thus activating a magnetic field shielding it from solar wind and other dangerous particles coming from supernovas, quasars and such threats.

Why in the world do you start comparing it with the rest of this solar system? Planets after mars are all gigants with some special properties, but the main source of life is light. They are simply to many Astronomic units far away.

Mars core is not as active as before since all vulcanic activity has stopped, thus making it clear that without a magnetic field the solar wind destroys the oppurtunity for proper life to exist.
Jupiter on the other hand has ultra extreme weather and the largest magnetic field, streching almost to saturn. Its protection is very dense but since its orbital rotation is 13.3 km/s the days are short, and its a 9 hour day my friend. Saturn is similar in weather and almost in size. But remember that jupiter quite big on the centre for the sole purpose of balancing the orbits and to swallow threats like comets .

OF COURSE earth is alive, what do you really think life is about?. It is everything, connections. The earth is just another exoplanet placed on the perfect place. Moving through the void of space with its momentum, perfect speed and Gravitational force.
Life cannot be given or "donated" if the donator himself is not alive.
 
Top