- Joined
- Jun 30, 2012
- Messages
- 27,280
- Reaction score
- 1,690
The funny thing about 'theories' is that the people who make them, hold their 'theories' to be true, and ignore what is written in the manga. Instead they twist words and some of their own assumptions to it. When they are told to prove their point, they ask you this instead , " whats your proof for that".
Theories that i'm talking about:
1. SO6P = Uzumaki
2. Hyuuga related to the Uchiha
3. Madara not having a PS at the VOTE battle
4. Tobirama's S/T was weak
5. Madara has no Tsukuyomi and Amaterasu.
6. Uzumaki > Senju
All these theories are fine as far as theories go. BUT when they consider them a fact or start to consider them a fact and use them as a debate point.. that's where it gets funny. Why? because it contradicts the Manga or the anime.
I applaud the theories and their makers.. but request them to not use them as facts or any other supporters who use them as facts.
Do you know any other theories that can relate to this? and how do you feel about it? And am i wrong?
Theories that i'm talking about:
1. SO6P = Uzumaki
2. Hyuuga related to the Uchiha
3. Madara not having a PS at the VOTE battle
4. Tobirama's S/T was weak
5. Madara has no Tsukuyomi and Amaterasu.
6. Uzumaki > Senju
All these theories are fine as far as theories go. BUT when they consider them a fact or start to consider them a fact and use them as a debate point.. that's where it gets funny. Why? because it contradicts the Manga or the anime.
I applaud the theories and their makers.. but request them to not use them as facts or any other supporters who use them as facts.
Do you know any other theories that can relate to this? and how do you feel about it? And am i wrong?