#FreedomOfSpeechMustBeAbsolute

[Avani 🥉]

Now we actually have a person who approves of Charlie Hebdo incident, a 'globally unacceptable' event. Should you ban them or listen to them ? They have thier side of the story to and must be listened to.

Yawn...

You have had enough attention- inversely proportionate seeing the depth of your argument.

The answer to your bait is- neither. I am not interested whether she supports it or opposes it. It's her freedom of opinion. But the moment this argument over this particular incident gets too heated and insulting with personal bashing and attacks- report it and we will handle it.

 

[Reraru]

And people by posting such stupid stuff and acting like hoodlums proved them right. You are too blinded to even notice that on every step admins were right.



Ah they insulted many not just staff and were posting factually wrong stuff- praise to their friends and bashing to everyone else. But people like to extend support to such trolls in lieu of certain personal benefits, while acting as if they are the one upholding internet rights.

You're right. Freedom of speech doesn't equal bashing, insulting or hurting anyone in anyway. Everyone should be banned who does that.

 

[Ken Kaneki]

And people by posting such stupid stuff and acting like hoodlums proved them right. You are too blinded to even notice that on every step admins were right.

It is your opinion that moderators were right and nobody is taking your right by deleting the post..get the diffetence ?

 

[Reraru]

Now we actually have a person who approves of Charlie Hebdo incident, a 'globally unacceptable' event. Should you ban them or listen to them ? They have thier side of the story to and must be listened to.

They have no right to insult. Insult is insult no matter what is the reason behind it therefore it's the best they are banned.

It is your opinion that moderators were right and nobody is taking your right by deleting the post..get the diffetence ?

The moderators don't do anything until many people report. So it isn't just their opinion.

 

[Ken Kaneki]

The answer to your bait is- neither. I am not interested whether she supports it or opposes it. It's her freedom of opinion.

But you are concerned or interested if anybody's opinion pertains to you or something of which you are a part of or something which you are interested in. That is bias.

Good day to you and it was nice discussing with you.

 

[Avani 🥉]

It is your opinion that moderators were right and nobody is taking your right by deleting the post..get the diffetence ?

Because my post is in accordance with the rules. It didn't involve calling someone names and abusing them and their family and extending harmful words to anyone or starting a forum drama in hope that people would remember them by, no matter how low grade it was. Get the difference? If you cannot, you are again proving how much the moderators are needed.

If my post didn't meet admins' criteria, it will meet the same fate.

But you are concerned or interested if anybody's opinion pertains to you or something of which you are a part of or something which you are interested in. That is bias.

Good day to you and it was nice discussing with you.

And that's why there are admins.

Nice talking to you too. Good night.

 

[Reraru]

But you are concerned or interested if anybody's opinion pertains to you or something of which you are a part of or something which you are interested in. That is bias.

Good day to you and it was nice discussing with you.

XD lol. Bye ~

 

[Ken Kaneki]

They have no right to insult. Insult is insult no matter what is the reason behind it therefore it's the best they are banned.

What is considered an insult is an changing thing. Als people have the right to ignore the 'insults' or raise their VOICES against it..

 

[BlacLord™]

I expected you to miss the point of the whole thing. And yes it does mean that you can say what you want without consequence. Otherwise Free Speech is not Free. Read again

We have freedom of speech.

But that doesn't, and shouldn't automatically entitle you to freedom from consequence. If you're being nasty/offensive, then you should rightly suffer the consequences, just like anybody else.

 

[Ken Kaneki]

Because my post is in accordance with the rules. It didn't involve calling someone names and abusing them and their family and extending harmful words to anyone or starting a forum drama in hope that people would remember them by, no matter how low grade it was. Get the difference? If you cannot, you are again proving how much the moderators are needed.

If my post didn't meet admins' criteria, it will meet the same fate.

And again we are back to the discussion about Rules or Rights. Rights > Rules. It is rights that keep the rules changing.
Nice talking to you too. Good night.[/QUOTE]
Lmao didn't remember that it is Good Night for you as well XD

 

[Wabbit]

Idk
There is no absolute freedom of speech. I have seen libtards asking absolute freedom of speech and then asking to ban CP. They are always limited by morality,things that affect diplomatic relations,invasion of others privacy etc.
But how do you decide what is moral and immoral? what is insult??
About Charlie hebdo,I saw most of people were like that was bad but those ****ers deserved it. They were happy about it. Because most of population which is religious do not like such people and think their beliefs should not be questioned or criticized. So you have laws were you are sent to jail or publicly beheaded at some places. They say it as it someone insulting them. Others think of them as savages and may find their preaching or beliefs as insult. Should their preaching be banned too?

Moderators job is to moderate. If they dont site would **** up. Even 4chan does not have real freedom of speech. [I am saying it generally. Not talking about NB mods wrongly banning or infraction ]

 

[Reraru]

What is considered an insult is an changing thing. Als people have the right to ignore the 'insults' or raise their VOICES against it..

Words are like arrows shot from bows they cannot be taken back especially insult. He should have thought about it. And about raising voices. People raised their voices and he got banned so he is simply getting what he deserves.