Found this regarding the Las Vegas shooting

[YowYan]

But where's your evidence that this shooting was a false flag operation in order to trigger martial law? Sounds like confirmation bias to me.

If you understand the why, you understand a piece of the puzzle which most on here do not.
But I'll highlight the details in my reply to Multiply.

YowYan thinks that every tragic event is a false flag operation.

That's funny. Really

Please provide proof of this being a false flag if not then you need to shut your hole because what you are doing is extremely disrespectful to those had died

You make no sense whatsoever. (as usual) The only thing skeptics are doing is try to figure out who is actually responsible and the 'why'.
Noone is desensitizing the deaths of innocent civilians. That's just your typical empty response.

Come on Yow. 'This will happen because this'. That's the extent of your argument.

Firstly, US citizens will never fully relinquish their right to bear arms. Secondly, you will never convince our military to kill our own citizens. It just won't happen.

at bold: Decades of planning can bear fruit to the most seemingly impossible goals. You underestimate the powers that be.

Anywho, first few red flags I can mention:

1. Homeland Security planned a mock terrorist drill in Las Vegas prior the actual event.
2. The lone gunman conveniently ends up dead.
3. Ex-militarymen present at the shooting notices muzzle blasts from more than one spot.
4. The lone gunmen, according to mainstream news, had a few dozen weapons in his hotel room. How could that have happened unnoticed.
5. A random woman blurted out "you will all die tonight" about an hour before the shooting started.
6. At a previous false flag event; Sandy Hook, where the dad of a supposedly deceased girl was grinning until he noticed he was being filmed and quickly jumped into character, forcing out crocodile tears, you see another lady on a picture with a sweatpants that says 'Las Vegas'. Obvious micro message but the general sheep wouldn't pick up on it.
7. After the first 911 emergency call, it took the police 72 minutes to locate the shooter. With all the muzzle blasts.

Terrorized populations allow governments to trample on their rights. Terrorized populations are easy to stampede off to war. Terrorized populations become like little children, credulously listening to their leaders, who become substitute parent figures.

But yeah, I'll go put on my tin foil hat, right

 

[Multiply]

at bold: Decades of planning can bear fruit to the most seemingly impossible goals. You underestimate the powers that be.

Anywho, first few red flags I can mention:

1. Homeland Security planned a mock terrorist drill in Las Vegas prior the actual event.
2. The lone gunman conveniently ends up dead.
3. Ex-militarymen present at the shooting notices muzzle blasts from more than one spot.
4. The lone gunmen, according to mainstream news, had a few dozen weapons in his hotel room. How could that have happened unnoticed.
5. A random woman blurted out "you will all die tonight" about an hour before the shooting started.
6. At a previous false flag event; Sandy Hook, where the dad of a supposedly deceased girl was grinning until he noticed he was being filmed and quickly jumped into character, forcing out crocodile tears, you see another lady on a picture with a sweatpants that says 'Las Vegas'. Obvious micro message but the general sheep wouldn't pick up on it.
7. After the first 911 emergency call, it took the police 72 minutes to locate the shooter. With all the muzzle blasts.

Terrorized populations allow governments to trample on their rights. Terrorized populations are easy to stampede off to war. Terrorized populations become like little children, credulously listening to their leaders, who become substitute parent figures.

But yeah, I'll go put on my tin foil hat, right

Just because it was 'planned' does not make it a false flag event. There may be evidence that he was not alone in the planning of this attack but you still have literally no evidence that the government is behind it. You didn't prove that this was a false flag event.

As for the government and US citizens. Someone will have to change our constitution in order to get rid of our guns. However, more than half of our country views that document in a higher standard than the bible. Good luck.

 

[YowYan]

Just because it was 'planned' does not make it a false flag event. There may be evidence that he was not alone in the planning of this attack but you still have literally no evidence that the government is behind it. You didn't prove that this was a false flag event.

As for the government and US citizens. Someone will have to change our constitution in order to get rid of our guns. However, more than half of our country views that document in a higher standard than the bible. Good luck.

I was about to edit my post but You already replied.
Direct, tangible proof is hard to be found which is obvious if you want to leave the masses with question Marks but no clear bullseye. That goes back to my First response; You don't seem to fully grasp how Your government operates and has been since the beginning.

But to entertain people's egoes, I'll stand corrected for now whilest precisely that which I've talked about on- and offline for the past 8 years unfolds under our noses.

You do know that there already have Been multiple appeals to sidetrack the constitution?
We can go in-depth on that in another thread.

A few more red flags so I don't go offtopic too much;

8. The shooter recently in the week before the shooting wired $100,000 to the Philippines, where his girlfriend has family and now resides. Why?

9. There is evidence the shooter used to work at Lockheed Martin and NASA. Was the shooter a government employee of any sort?
– Source: [link to www2.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)]


10. The shooter used at least two fully automatic rifles (modded). He had no military or militia background. How did he get them and if he modded them himself, how did he do it?
– Source (modified automatics): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (no military background): [link to

You must be registered for see links

11. The official story is that the attack was launched from a “Vista Suite” on the northeast corner of the Mandalay Bay Hotel’s northernmost “wing.” Two windows were broken with a hammer in the 32nd floor, two-bedroom suite. Automatic scoped rifles were then set up on racks or platforms in each of these windows, and the shooter alternated between these rifles for 17 9 minutes of total fire time in a roughly 70 minute period. Why would the shooter alternate between two rooms? Were there multiple shooters?
– Source (room 32135): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (two windows): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (tripods): [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]

12. There is footage of muzzle flare from the ~4th floor. Was the shooting coming from the 32nd or the 4th, or both?
– Source: [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]
– Source: [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]
– Source (4:57): [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]
– Comprehensive source: [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (police scanner): (full)

There's more but This should be enough of a trigger To start asking questions instead of waitimg for fox news To air. I'm not saying All the abovementioned red flags are irrefutible. It just provides a ? To work with.

 

[~WastelandSociety~]

1. Homeland Security planned a mock terrorist drill in Las Vegas prior the actual event.
2. The lone gunman conveniently ends up dead.
3. Ex-militarymen present at the shooting notices muzzle blasts from more than one spot.
4. The lone gunmen, according to mainstream news, had a few dozen weapons in his hotel room. How could that have happened unnoticed.
5. A random woman blurted out "you will all die tonight" about an hour before the shooting started.

1. Yeah due to the whole London incident. But how does that prove that the government had a hand in the shooting? You’d think such a plan would be kept a secret and not so obvious.

2. Much like some murderers who are about to get caught by the police and are to much of a coward to face the aftermath of their actions by the public or their families.

3. There’s pictures of the hotel only showing two broken windows from the gunmen room. No other floors have signs of windows being damaged. Which it turns out those “muzzle flashes” were just flashing lights not from gun fire.Which you could see from videos before the shootings and after.

4. Well it’s not uncommon for people staying in their hotel rooms to bring out a suit case each time they leave their rooms and return. So it’s most likely within the days he was staying there,he was slowly bringing up his weapons and ammunition.

5. According to news sources,police are looking for a woman who was with him. So most likely she had a hand in it and with #4 was probably helping him bring his other guns and ammunition to his room.

8. The shooter recently in the week before the shooting wired $100,000 to the Philippines, where his girlfriend has family and now resides. Why?

9. There is evidence the shooter used to work at Lockheed Martin and NASA. Was the shooter a government employee of any sort?
– Source: [link to www2.jpl.nasa.gov (secure)]


10. The shooter used at least two fully automatic rifles (modded). He had no military or militia background. How did he get them and if he modded them himself, how did he do it?
– Source (modified automatics): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (no military background): [link to

You must be registered for see links

11. The official story is that the attack was launched from a “Vista Suite” on the northeast corner of the Mandalay Bay Hotel’s northernmost “wing.” Two windows were broken with a hammer in the 32nd floor, two-bedroom suite. Automatic scoped rifles were then set up on racks or platforms in each of these windows, and the shooter alternated between these rifles for 17 9 minutes of total fire time in a roughly 70 minute period. Why would the shooter alternate between two rooms? Were there multiple shooters?
– Source (room 32135): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (two windows): [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (tripods): [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]

12. There is footage of muzzle flare from the ~4th floor. Was the shooting coming from the 32nd or the 4th, or both?
– Source: [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]
– Source: [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]
– Source (4:57): [link to

You must be registered for see links

(secure)]
– Comprehensive source: [link to

You must be registered for see links

– Source (police scanner): (full)

There's more but This should be enough of a trigger To start asking questions instead of waitimg for fox news To air. I'm not saying All the abovementioned red flags are irrefutible. It just provides a ? To work with.

8. As his brother stated in a few interviews , the guy cared about his family and the ones he was in a relationship with. No one really knows why he did it which is why his girlfriend is currently under questioning. But most likely he wanted to make sure she was taken care of before something happened to him.

9. He used to work for a company that later become Lockheed Martin. “Stephen Paddock worked for a predecessor company of Lockheed Martin from 1985 until 1988. We’re cooperating with authorities to answer questions they may have about Mr. Paddock and his time with the company,” Lockheed Martin said in a statement.
Lockheed Martin did not disclose which company employed Paddock. The Bethesda, Maryland-based defense contractor was created through the merger of Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta in 1995.
A report from ABC News said Paddock worked as an accountant or auditor.”

It doesn’t look like he was actually involved with NASA. And there’s no other signs of him being a government employee. The brother stated that he made a living successfully gambling.

10. Well it’s been said he has been slowly stockpiling weapons since the late 1980’s last I heard. So he probably been practicing using his guns. Also those bump stocks aren’t that hard to use or put together as you can see in the video

You must be registered for see links

Which really you don’t need any type of military training to be able to shoot at a large crowd of people.

11.
He probably alternate between the two windows to keep the gun fire going. If there were multiple shooters then there wouldn’t be a pause when he alternated . Also the police closed in to his floor from the time he started shooting at 10:05 pm to 10:17pm when two officers were on his floor after hearing shots fired from the floor below a few minutes ago.

12. It wasn’t muzzle flash from a gun. Otherwise the two police officers making their way up would have confirmed it. Also it didn’t match up with the gun shot sounds in videos.