Why would anyone decide what their favourite WMD is? WMD's suck, nothing good comes from them, only pain and death. The scenario is also rather vague and silly.
i gave you a scenario tho
so you'll kill a whole army with your bare fists ?:erm:
Yes, they suck .... as does Volcanoes, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, Plagues etc. .... Yet they have a natural purpose, how ugly it may be. So does the WMD.
Mass destruction, not small city buster.
The same goes for them - what would make someone want to have a favourite Natural Disaster?
Also, WMD's are obviously not natural.
[video=youtube;-v1ibxYk8xo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v1ibxYk8xo[/video]
This is known as a strategic class magic, its magic that surpasses nuclear arms.
This attack varies in destruction.
In this video he converted a flags mass into pure energy equivalent to 20,000,000 tons of TNT.
Plus this attack has no known limits, so in theory if he coverted a large enough mass into energy he could annihilate the whole planet.
More details on the wiki.
You must be registered for see links
No, it doesn't.
It's actually the equivalent to the heat energy of 20,000,000 tons of TNT, that doesn't denote blast radius of it... which is seemingly small. Besides, even if it were pure energy, it would still be titchy compared to the already deployed warheads like the Tsar Bomba which is the equivalent of 50,000,000 tons of TNT... and that's not just heat energy.
Also, even the Wikia says that is considered the "magical equivalent", not that it is supreme.
Favorite? No no .... But I would rather have volcano over anything else if there was a choice. But my point was that they have purpose, Natural disasters are something that ensures the survival of the wiser and stronger ones and makes sure that the remaining populations grows stronger.
As for WMD .... You people are too mushy to realize that many things in life are not honey and butterflies and there are some seriously ****ed up thing, thus WMD has the vital purpose of being deterrents and final fail safe.