No you only explained why and how you liked him better. But didn't tell us how hes a better character. You failed to establish what is a "good" character.....I did explain why and how.
No you only explained why and how you liked him better. But didn't tell us how hes a better character. You failed to establish what is a "good" character.....I did explain why and how.
It looks like you can't read well, or are biased, so this'll be my last reply to you on the subject matter.No you only explained why and how you liked him better. But didn't tell us how hes a better character. You failed to establish what is a "good" character.....
What are the standards for a main characteR?It looks like you can't read well, or are biased, so this'll be my last reply to you on the subject matter.
For a main character, she is supposed to have many interesting traits, whether they are good or bad, and have some kind of basis and ethos associated with her. However, she's so one dimensional it's almost like what Hinata would be if she was considered a main character. Not to mention the impact she had in the manga was negligible.
He was actually funny and had interesting jutsu.No you only explained why and how you liked him better. But didn't tell us how hes a better character. You failed to establish what is a "good" character.....
Soo.. funny people are good characters?? Genjutsu people are good characters??He was actually funny and had interesting jutsu.
His personality didn't revolve around a one-dimensional and unhealthy obsession with Sasuke.
Actually they are. If a character can spark a positive emotion to the audience, then they are a good character. I said his jutsu was more interesting than Sakura's, not that genjutsu=good characters.Soo.. funny people are good characters?? Genjutsu people are good characters??
Is hulk a bad character??
One-dimensional personality.. how so??