- Joined
- Jun 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,379
- Reaction score
- 235
You must be registered for see images
[/IMG]
You must be registered for see images
[/IMG]
You must be registered for see images
[/IMG]why would someone revive this troll thread?
Funny, coming from a troll account
aye. i'm sick and tired of reading people's assumptions. Naruto this... Naruto that.... Madara this..... Madara that.... FOR THE LOVE OF PETE YOU CAN NEVER TELL WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!! how will they had gotten the juubi outta the way??? How will Naruto know he's not fighting a clone?? Think about it this way:
Naruto is one of the most unpredictable ppl of the manga: not someone who can do the impossible, but just the unexpected. What he doesn't have in brains, he makes up for with simple strategy and heart. Not to mention a massive reserve of kyuubi chakra.
HOWEVER:
Edo Madara currently has the power of a God. Senju + Uchiha. And not only that, but an immortal body with unlimited chakra, tactical ingeniuity and the ability to use them. You keep giving situations situations situations as if each one is bound to happen. As far as i'm concerned Madara used to pawn the kyuubi as his lil bitch. Now he has Hashi's power as well as his own. Face it, Hashirama is the only one who can currently stop him. Last time i checked summoning was only achieved with a contract. So how can u even expect reverse summoning to work???? Face it. I dont like it either bt Naruto is Madara's bitch right now. BELIEVE IT.
Theres a whole section based on how Preta Path wont work. Theres even another counter to preta in pure speed.
Dont get me wrong. This thread just shows that he would beat Madara, but at Very High - Max Diff.
* P.S.: is there a part of these forums where you can debate for other Universe's? I've been itching to have a debate about Dante (DMC3) vs. Dante (DMC: Devil May Cry)
If your tired of people's Assumptions then why bring yours I here? As far as I'm concerned I've proven Maruto wins, and I'm defiantly not the only one that thinks this.
naruto has no counter for PS
wood clones with PS rapes naruto negative diff
Apparently you don't know how to read.
Your post is inaccurate on too many accounts that i'm willing to flaw atm....probably the whole thing and given the fact that youYou must be registered for see linksshowed that your judgement is biased. We know that He is able to use:
1 Rasengan
You must be registered for see links
3 Kage bunshins (BM)
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
1 SM Kage Bunshin
You must be registered for see links
2 Large Bijuu Dama
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
1 small bijuu dama
You must be registered for see links
He also lost some chakra here:
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
You also greatly underestimate and gave absolutely no credit to Madara's Taijtusu Feats. You also fantasied some crap about Madara's Chakra levels When Madara was capable to stand up to hashirama who could supposedly regenerate his chakra and had an enourmous chakra pool via Mokuton Abilities. Not only did stand up to Hashirama, he was able to Completely control the kyuubi which weYou must be registered for see linksand even after their fight at vote, Madara was able to fake his death and supposedly make a full recovery save one wound, as seenYou must be registered for see links. It has also been said that during his Generation, the uchiha clan wasYou must be registered for see linksin terms of Chakra, this may not be factual but it implies that they maintained an enormous chakra pool as well. Madara being able to stand up to hashirama is a fact of that. Naruto can beat an edo which undoubtedly possesses eternal chakra, life and stamina? Stop fantasizing.
Not is crap again
All I see is an avalanche of Madara fan regurgitating things he's already countered. Just ignore them.
Your whole argument here is about Chakra levels. Madara being an Edo literally makes a stamina argument pointless.
You do realize that They cut the link off and saved it for later correct?