I would like to know your philosophy even if it is out of context, so that I can understand fully
I don't wanna discuss it ghhh. I don't like the points.
I think it is specifically aimed at people's spouses. My philosophy is the same. If she is my spouse, and a situation for arises, I believe both people should try. If the situation is extreme and no compromises can be made, then either party should be free to walk out. But saying that only one should compromise is not acceptable.Some of these "empowerment" videos have a key concept behind them: Accept everything I do, I accept no personal responsibility. This is not the real world. My philosophy is simple to people that need everyone's acceptance. Simply surround yourself with like-minds, instead of trying to bully acceptance out of others.
Not everyone agrees or gets along. I don't expect the world to approve of everything I do, everything I listen to, or even everything I believe. I expect this to a degree from my friends or people I've been able to positively affect, or those that positively affect me. I don't expect outsiders to have an understanding of me, or to be free of their judgement. Nobody can promise such a thing.
For example, I hear from a lot of girls my age about how everyone should accept them having one night stands with multiple people a week. I'll show them respect and tolerance, but I cannot be much of a friend to them, because it is an important freedom to them, but one that isn't a priority to me (I value close friend circles and relationships, our interests even as friends will be inherently different under most circumstances). So I typically don't associate with those like this regularly. But they find people who believe the same as them, and I only hope that they may find those who accept them and be happy with that.
In context of this video, no, I will not accept nor respect you to a meaningful degree if cheating is an important value to you. In fact, I won't go that far, I'll simply not associate with such a person. If this is her value system, she should find others that accept those choices, not preach for acceptance from random people.
"My music, your noise, your sins, my virtue .........." to me sings the very nature of our existence. I can tell you people that don't approve of what I do, such as having a few drinks on the weekend and playing video games with friends, or even just my personality. There's also those that don't care what I do. Then there's the world that actually affects me, and that is my personal choice on who I surround myself with. I don't try to bully acceptance from those that simply don't like me.
I tried to make this as short and relevant as possible, but this is how I feel about these grey lines of morality vs acceptance. Nobody is going to accept you for everything you do, and half of the people won't care about what you do. In a video that attempts to escape the responsibility of cheating and wants the world to accept it. I answer no. Find others that accept it, but I'll have nothing to do with it.
And for the record, I am pro human rights.
I think it is specifically aimed at people's spouses. My philosophy is the same. If she is my spouse, and a situation for arises, I believe both people should try. If the situation is extreme and no compromises can be made, then either party should be free to walk out. But saying that only one should compromise is not acceptable.
Ha! Bull shit.
Nobody here is against Women Empowerment. But the way Vogue has defined it is a problem.There's no problem in empowering women that should be done but if i talk about the video, let's say women should be able to make their choices wisely ( it's same for any man ) not putting themselves or any other person in harms way and that's what gonna happen if they make their choices unwisely and say it's my choice .
I wasn't pointing at anyone just said it as a fact and what i said above is a personal opinion normally i don't follow the popular beliefs .Nobody here is against Women Empowerment. But the way Vogue has defined it is a problem.
I wasn't pointing at anyone just said it as a fact and what i said above is a personal opinion normally i don't follow the popular beliefs .
Good to know that even the Aussies are on board.
Not all of us are complete ****ing idiots.
OT:
1. I would not imagine so, unless of course an individual is no longer married or in the process of splitting up from their marriage.
2. If one does not wish to have a child, then that is the parent's decision and theirs alone.
3. I really don't know what reason a woman, married and all, would be making their way home that early in the morning or late home unless it was for their job.
The women in the video is a famous Indian actress
Now naturally this has sparked controversy. While many of the things in video are justified, do you agree with the following :-
1) *** outside marriage is justified ?
2) To have your baby or not to have it?
3) Don't be fooled if I come at 4 AM or 6 PM?(The way it is portrayed implying infidelity)
4) My music, your noise, your sins, my virtue ..........
I have no problem with a women loving women, having *** before marriage or even getting a divorce if she is unhappy. But the above points challenge my understanding of empowerment.
What about you ? Do you agree with Vogue's version of empowerment ? I would also like to know your country to see the difference across nations/cultures. I am from India.
1) *** outside marriage is justified ?
Nope. But it's not really making a case for having *** outside the marriage- It's more like saying " I like acting like a selfish idiot- my choice". I see two scenarios why someone would add it:
This video in generality is aimed at spouses/boyfriends not society, at least that is what I can decipher from it. The last part makes this clear. So I don't think they mean to say that society is judging a women for having a certain character. It came out exactly the way they wanted it to come out, i.e. you(spouse) should not mind if I go outside marriage. This is corroborated by the undertone where she speaks, I am universe, I am infinite, I am unbound............. So they mean exactly what they have put here.(I)Whatever they wanted to say, came out wrong for some reason. For example :
They may have meant to say that even if someone is indulging in such behaviour for some reason even then it doesn't give others( Third parties) a right judge her and use the situation for their own advantage.
Kind of for cases where some people try to justify a rape on basis of character of the woman. In this scenario it often happens that the party accused of raping tries to neutralize the incident by tarnishing the image of the victim by attempting to raise suspicion about her character. Such a practice often leads to victims not reporting the incident in the first place to avoid further psychological trauma.
Thought was there. Vogue, a director, an actress, so many women, this was not a small scale thing. Many people/minds were included.(II) Whoever wrote it didn't give it much thought.
2) To have your baby or not to have it?
Why not? This is one major issue directly related with abortion and affects the the woman in many ways- physically, mentally, economially, socially. In some countries women are not able to get one even in most dire situations, while in others they are forcd to undergo an abortion because the fetus is declared female- in either case often the female's opinion or even her medical condition physical or mental means little by the husband/in laws.
3) Don't be fooled if I come at 4 AM or 6 PM?(The way it is portrayed implying infidelity)
No it only means do not judge someone based on what time they are coming back- if someone is returning home at 4 AM doesn't necessarily mean they were out for some mischief. They might just be out working all night or may have some other valid reason. It's more for those who believe women shouldn't be out after it gets dark. Remember the Delhi rape case? Rapists tiried to justify that the girl was returning home late night.
4) My music, your noise, your sins, my virtue ..........
No idea what you want to say here...
Knew this was coming.
Agreed till here
This video in generality is aimed at spouses/boyfriends not society, at least that is what I can decipher from it. The last part makes this clear. So I don't think they mean to say that society is judging a women for having a certain character. It came out exactly the way they wanted it to come out, i.e. you(spouse) should not mind if I go outside marriage. This is corroborated by the undertone where she speaks, I am universe, I am infinite, I am unbound............. So they mean exactly what they have put here.
Thought was there. Vogue, a director, an actress, so many women, this was not a small scale thing. Many people/minds were included.
As, I said earlier on this thread also, "2) In most countries women have to right to have a baby or not, irrespective of any reasons. It is her right.
I feel that if the couple is married and *** was consentual, and there are no medical complications, then the opinion of both should matter."
Let's not talk about other countries because the target audience here is India. In India, women can abort if they want.
But if they choose to have the baby, the liability is joint. So in a case where the *** was consensual, they are married and no complications are there, why should only a women's opinion matter when if she chooses to have the baby, the responsibility is of both?
No it does not mean that. See what is on the video when she says this. She is putting on her undergarments and what she wants to say is pretty clear as well.
I just wanted to ask people what do they think about compromise, because clearly in the last part she is talking about compromises that have to be made and that she won't make any. So in order for the relationship to survive, who makes the compromises? Men? All the time? So there is no middle ground? Your way or the high way? I don't agree with this line of thought.