Another nerd question.
When it comes to crime, what drives people the most when judging and deeming someone a criminal?
Is it A:
The person technically breaks the law, this is a fact, so therefore he is a criminal.
B:
The person did something horrendous and disgusting.
Also, what should be the most important factor? What is the most unbiased? Maybe you think it's justice if you only go by the law and not your emotions, but the law is made by men not Gods, (I'm not talking religious laws,) and how is it fair if someone gets away with something just cus it's not illegal? Or that they don't get away with something when it's "fine"?
But then again, people can overreact, so just cus you think something is terrible doesn't mean others share that opinion.
When it comes to crime, what drives people the most when judging and deeming someone a criminal?
Is it A:
The person technically breaks the law, this is a fact, so therefore he is a criminal.
B:
The person did something horrendous and disgusting.
Also, what should be the most important factor? What is the most unbiased? Maybe you think it's justice if you only go by the law and not your emotions, but the law is made by men not Gods, (I'm not talking religious laws,) and how is it fair if someone gets away with something just cus it's not illegal? Or that they don't get away with something when it's "fine"?
But then again, people can overreact, so just cus you think something is terrible doesn't mean others share that opinion.