Edward Snowden, NSA leaks

Takure

Active member
Regular
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
1,261
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
A 29-year-old man who says he is a former undercover CIA employee said Sunday that he was the principal source of recent disclosures about *top-secret National Security Agency programs, exposing himself to possible prosecution in an acknowledgment that had little if any precedent in the long history of U.S. intelligence leaks.

Edward Snowden, a tech specialist who has contracted for the NSA and works for the consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton, unmasked himself as a source after a string of stories in The Washington Post and the Guardian that detailed previously unknown U.S. surveillance programs. He said he disclosed secret documents in response to what he described as the systematic surveillance of innocent citizens.

In an interview Sunday, Snowden said he is willing to face the consequences of exposure.

“I’m not going to hide,” Snowden told The Post from Hong Kong, where he has been staying. “Allowing the U.S. government to intimidate its people with threats of retaliation for revealing wrongdoing is contrary to the public interest.”

Asked whether he believes that his disclosures will change anything, he said: “I think they already have. Everyone everywhere now understands how bad things have gotten — and they’re talking about it. They have the power to decide for themselves whether they are willing to sacrifice their privacy to the surveillance state.”

Snowden said nobody had been aware of his actions, including those closest to him. He said there was no single event that spurred his decision to leak the information, but he said President Obama has failed to live up to his pledges of transparency.

“My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them,” he said in a note that accompanied the first document he leaked to The Post.

The Guardian was the first to publicly identify Snowden, at his request.

The White House said late Sunday that it would not have any comment on the matter.

In a brief statement, a spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said the intelligence community is “reviewing the damage” the leaks have done. “Any person who has a security clearance knows that he or she has an obligation to protect classified information and abide by the law,” said the spokesman, Shawn Turner.

Snowden said he is seeking “asylum from any countries that believe in free speech and oppose the victimization of global privacy,” but the law appears to provide for his extradition from Hong Kong, a semiautonomous territory of China, to the United States.

Although any extradition proceeding could take months or even years, experts said Snowden has not put himself in a favorable position.

“The fact that he outed himself and basically said, from what I understand he has said, ‘I feel very comfortable with what I have done’ . . . that’s not going to help him in his extradition contest,” said Douglas McNabb, a lawyer and extradition expert.

The Justice Department said it is in the “initial stages of an investigation” into the unauthorized disclosure of classified information but declined to comment further.
Source: Washington Post

Additional information: Edward Snowden has now fled his previously undisclosed apartment, after fearing for his life.​
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
To be honest, the data mining programs aren't as capable as many people like to make them out to be. There's simply too much real-time traffic to capture all of it, and there's too much real-time traffic to process even 1% of it.

For those interested:



Actually, this sounds like an adaptation and expansion of Echelon:

Which I would then say is highly likely that other countries - though quick to condemn the U.S. on this - are likely just as involved.

My thoughts on this are... strained.

On one hand - it is perfectly within the concept of national defense to monitor 'the digital world' - just as one would stand post outside a military base or patrol the local market.

On the other... it's difficult to draw the line of how much oversight is too much.

Honestly, though - the cries of treason from Congress are hilarious, at best. Most of them are already guilty of treason and should be hung. They don't uphold the Constitution or genuinely represent the concerns and needs of the people they are granted office to represent (they don't just represent the people who voted for them). They exact their personal views and ambitions upon the laws and government of this nation - and for that, none of them deserve the office and more than a few of them should be brought up on treason.

The revealing of this program's existence was not at all an act of treason.

Allowing Chinese companies to effectively purchase U.S. industry trade secrets crucial to manufacturing defense components and to preserving industrial superiority, however, is treason. A fair number of CEOs should be brought up on treason and the corporations, themselves, brought into compliance with the ITAR.

It's okay to sell your country out so long as you're creating gains in the stock market... but it's not okay to reveal less-than-honest surveilance programs conducted without public oversight within a constitutional democracy...

I would say that I want to build a space station and live on that with a few people... but it'd only take a few generations for that to all go to hell in a handbasket... so, instead, I pray for the zombie apocalypse.
 
Top