- Joined
- Oct 6, 2011
- Messages
- 9,979
- Reaction score
- 1,256
The part about only Hashirama being able to stop him may have been a hyperbole but the overall idea of Hashirama being able to beat Madara can't be deemed hyperbole just because of that. Why bring Obito into this? He has no relevance to this discussion as Madara was clearly talking about Hashirama is the only one who can beat him in a fight, as he was comparing how the Gokage can't beat him to how Hashirama can beat him. The Obito and Madara situation is not related to a battle so no, that statement is not invalid.
Nagato claiming he is God is very very different from Madara saying Hashirama can beat him. Nagato claiming he is God is an obvious unsupported hyperbole. Madara saying Hashirama can beat him is fact because Madara who knows his own limits and Hashirama's limits stated that Hashirama can beat him. Same thing with Jiraiya saying he will kill Kisame and Itachi. Completely unsupported.
When two people are rivals, fight frequently and know each other's limits. When one says the other can beat him, then its true.
Obviously he isn't a fusion of the two and its not like Goku beating Vegito.
Can Madara use every single one of Hashirama's abilities and techniques? No. So that invalidates your little comparison.
They are characters other than Hashirama who could defeat Madara in a fight, like kabuto or the Sage for example and your contradicting yourself on the bold. However, the statement over all isn't implying that Hashirama is going do defeat Madara single handedly, or even at all. When Madara made that statement Hashirama himself was dead and there was no implication of his resurrection via edo tensei or that he would even receive screen time. Your stretching the statement.