Durant's scoring streak

Heisenberg284

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
2,368
Reaction score
258
Has nothing on the Big Dipper, wilt chamberlain.

126 straight of 25 or more

80 straight if you are going by single season ( only played 80 games back then)

In that season he also had a 78 point 43 rebound game

A 73 point game and multiple other 50 point games against hall of famer Walt Bellamy

A 62 point game against Bill Russell

Just so you guys don't use the 6"6 white guy crap (which btw the average height of a big was 6"10)

And a 100 point game.

Averaged 50 points and 25 rebounds a game

Loggin 48.5 Minutes a game (crazy stamina)
 

edo tensai wilmaso

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
1,924
Reaction score
86
Hey man i understand where you coming from but i dont consider him to be the most dominant if that was the case he would have 11 rings not bill rusell, i het the records and all but out of 13 seasons you only won 2 and let bill win 11 chips but you were supposed to be the most dominant force in NBA history. also the rules and speed of the game has changed, i consider the big O one of the best. how you average a triple double.

also 48 mins a game in this era would be incredible back then not to sure considering a reach in foul or any foul even if you werent in the penalty would be automatic freethrows , no 3 point line which means no spacing which means less running, its not like he was PG he just chilled in the post all day.
 
Last edited:

Heisenberg284

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
2,368
Reaction score
258
Hey man i understand where you coming from but i dont consider him to be the most dominant if that was the case he would have 11 rings not bill rusell, i het the records and all but out of 13 seasons you only won 2 and let bill win 11 chips but you were supposed to be the most dominant force in NBA history. also the rules and speed of the game has changed, i consider the big O one of the best. how you average a triple double.

also 48 mins a game in this era would be incredible back then not to sure considering a reach in foul or any foul even if you werent in the penalty would be automatic freethrows , no 3 point line which means no spacing which means less running, its not like he was PG he just chilled in the post all day.

You're way off.

The pacing back then was faster than today. Teams averaged 120 points a game, think About that.

Also, Russell had 7 hall of famers on his team.

Wilt against Russell, 28.7 points 28.7 boards

Russell against wilt 14 points 23 boards

Russell only eclipsed 30 points twice against wilt, while wilt eclipsed 50 points 8 times against russell

Also, it's harder for a 7 footer to play 48 minutes a game, not even guards can do that, or ther big men. Which is why wilt is the only one to exclipse that feat
 
Last edited:

edo tensai wilmaso

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
1,924
Reaction score
86
umm theres a reason why they scored so much and it has nothing to do with speed , didn't i just tell you ppl shot free throws all day , if the nba was how it used to be it would lose a lot of fans .. seriously it would take more time it would just turn into a free-throw shooting contest in the last quarter , and the amount of perimeter jumpshots was minimal it was feed it to the post game. also wilt in any era would be a bully ... but he had no jumpshot , the most recent player to even be dominant like that was shaq, he got more rings than wilt yea shaq had kobe but who won those final mvps in that 3 year span it was shaq not kobe.

also not all teams avg 120 points only the great offensive teams were. And the celtics did have a better team but , so did san antonio last year and lost in the finals.
 
Last edited:
Top