Netsui
Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
- Messages
- 5,628
- Reaction score
- 408
I didn't want to put any spoilers in the title, but if you are not caught up with the manga, then please do not continue reading.
I want to have an actual discussion, so we can get different opinions, about two things. Oh, and I'm trying to keep this as short as possible, so please read?
I want to try to have an actual discussion with Fairy Tail Fans. If I missed something, please point it out.
As some of us know, these two dragon slayers were introduced in the recent Fairy Tail Arc.
We know how there are 1st Generation, and 2nd Generation dragon slayers.
^ That was only the history, now here comes the parts I want to discuss.
In the manga, Sting and Rogue clearly said this, and I don't think there's any other way to read that.
Do you think they were lying, or telling the truth? That's what I want our discussion to be about. I think it could be either way, except I think Rogue might have been the one lying. I think it could be the truth, because of the name Dragon Slayer.
We have seen Acnologia on Tenrou Island, and even with four Dragon Slayers fighting it seemed more like a warm up to Acnologia. I don't expect their dragons to be foddlers, so this is why I'm thinking something was up. Oh, and if they were telling the truth that could explain why the dragons disappeared, and why Acnologia hates humans. Dragons feared that they would go extinct if others turned out like Rogue and Sting, and Acnologia could just hate them because they shouldn't be killing dragons. <-- I know that may not be right, but it's also a thought.
It seems like Sting would be the type that doesn't care about his comrades, or at least the ones who he found weak. Rogue, on the other hand, comes across as a character who cares about their comrades, no matter what. Rogue called Yukino their comrade, but wouldn't he count the dragon that taught him magic a comrade as well?
That's all I wanted to say, and I wanted to get some opinions on those two. I also don't want to see this turned into a flaming thread. If this thread was made before then I didn't see it before, I used the search bar, I used the advanced search bar, and I saw the similar threads list, so I apologize. I just want to have a nice discussion with other members.
I want to have an actual discussion, so we can get different opinions, about two things. Oh, and I'm trying to keep this as short as possible, so please read?
I want to try to have an actual discussion with Fairy Tail Fans. If I missed something, please point it out. As some of us know, these two dragon slayers were introduced in the recent Fairy Tail Arc.
You must be registered for see images
We know how there are 1st Generation, and 2nd Generation dragon slayers.
You must be registered for see images
In this page here we get a brief description of the 1st and 2nd Generations, along with the 3rd Generation, which Sting and Rogue are 3rd Generation.^ That was only the history, now here comes the parts I want to discuss.
In the manga, Sting and Rogue clearly said this, and I don't think there's any other way to read that.
You must be registered for see images
Do you think they were lying, or telling the truth? That's what I want our discussion to be about. I think it could be either way, except I think Rogue might have been the one lying. I think it could be the truth, because of the name Dragon Slayer.
You must be registered for see images
We have seen Acnologia on Tenrou Island, and even with four Dragon Slayers fighting it seemed more like a warm up to Acnologia. I don't expect their dragons to be foddlers, so this is why I'm thinking something was up. Oh, and if they were telling the truth that could explain why the dragons disappeared, and why Acnologia hates humans. Dragons feared that they would go extinct if others turned out like Rogue and Sting, and Acnologia could just hate them because they shouldn't be killing dragons. <-- I know that may not be right, but it's also a thought.
It seems like Sting would be the type that doesn't care about his comrades, or at least the ones who he found weak. Rogue, on the other hand, comes across as a character who cares about their comrades, no matter what. Rogue called Yukino their comrade, but wouldn't he count the dragon that taught him magic a comrade as well?
That's all I wanted to say, and I wanted to get some opinions on those two.
I also don't want to see this turned into a flaming thread. If this thread was made before then I didn't see it before, I used the search bar, I used the advanced search bar, and I saw the similar threads list, so I apologize. I just want to have a nice discussion with other members. 
