Donald Trump !!

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
He's never going to reduce the unemployment rate and increase the economy, when he hardly donates his personal wealth to poor American communities in need. Furthermore, his personal net worth is some $2 or $3 billion, so he hardly has any knowledge or experience in economics. US is currently at an $18 trillion debt, and 5-10% of unemployment rate.

He's never going to strengthen the military either. The military itself is what's bulking the debt more and more. Some $600-$700 billion is spent on national defence alone - that is more than the entire world combined. And it is the reason why the debt is at what is now. Since the Afghanistan and Iraq war, more than $1 trillion was spent. Donald Trump is not even a military expert in dealing with the conflicts US is involved at in Eastern Europe, Middle East and Eastern China.

The fact he even called Muslim terrorists ''rich'' and grudge against China shows his foreign policies will likely draw the world into a world war, if he's ever elected.

This fat shit is obviously not sophisticated at geopolitics. He should stick to his poor business administration instead, and spend his last years contributing his billions like what Bill Gates is doing.
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Rubio and Christie really aren't being taken seriously as conservative candidates.

The people who are motivated to actually appear at the primaries have been talking people like Scott Walker and Ted Cruz. There are some who are considering Carson, but most aren't all that enthusiastic about any of the choices.

The GOP is pretty much done even within conservative circles. If they can force their way through the primaries by conscripting democrats to vote in the republican primaries (which they have done in the past) - then there are people who will vote for them simply because they aren't democrats, but most people have been pretty put off by the GOP, lately.

Most of the conservatives will find an independent to vote for just to not give the GOP any ideas that they have tacit approval to continue existing.



In a simple word: no.

There is a reason why she 're-launched' her campaign. That reason is the same reason she is not electable. Her speeches have more press than guests. Her 'talks with average people' have been shown to be campaign workers for the democratic party who weren't even told they were meeting Hillary until after they were committed.

No one likes her. She is a cold, vile woman who didn't think twice about giving the order to allow an ambassador to be killed rather than blow the lid on her program to arm Syrian rebels (who later became ISIS).

She gives flat, uninspiring speeches and acts as if the world owes her the presidency.

Yes, there are lobotomized zombies who will vote for her because she allegedly has a vagina and a D next to her name - but there are many within her own party who simply won't be motivated to vote for her - or be motivated to vote against her because she is so repulsive. Her book she wrote about being the Secretary of State? Complete and total flop. Book stores couldn't give it away. Compare this to books written about Obama's campaign, about Bush, or about Katniss.

The democrats will run Fauxahantas (Elizabeth Warren) over Hillary. One of the reasons they are letting Hillary act like she's going to run is because she needs to embezzle more money out of her 'charity' and because she knows where the skeletons are buried - Hillary is a Fratricide risk for the Democratic party - she'll slaughter another strong democratic candidate who tries to step out of line by airing out their dirty laundry and quite possibly getting a court conviction on them.

Obama won by appealing to the younger voter base that grew up during the late 80s and 90s. Polling data shows that voting demographic has swung -very- conservative over the past 4 years (the product doesn't stack up to the marketing) - not in who they support, but in their views on policy. Arguably, they are more Libertarian than Conservative - but that places them more in favor of candidates like Reagan than Clinton - which is a massive swing away from candidates like Obama.

That voting demographic comprises a considerable 12 year grouping, or so, and there hasn't been sufficient time for the 'disenfranchised youth' voting pool to re-stock. Motivating them in a similar fashion to get out and vote will be hard enough to repeat even if they had another Obama. Clinton is a pasty old white hag complete with a maniacal cackle. She belongs in a shack, stirring a cauldron; not sitting in the White House. The fact she has a dried up vagina isn't going to motivate even the disenfranchised youth to vote for some kind of hope and change.

Someone like Warren is infinitely more personable (though she's even more psychotically 'progressive').

Of course, Hillary should be on trial for multiple counts of treason, fraud, obstruction of justice, etc. If she manages to dodge several death sentences, she should never see the light of day, again.

Much less campaigning to be President.

But the GOP is incompetent and won't actually prosecute her because they think that the Democrats are going to give them a reach-around next time the big blue weenie gets crammed up their rectum. That is why Boehner is meeting with Obama to try and get the trade deal that gives Obama unilateral authority to negotiate trades passed through congress.

Or... whatever it does. No one who has seen the legislation is allowed to tell us what it says and even Pelosi is against giving the President that kind of authority.

Which is why the conservatives are about to boot the GOP out of the Republican party. That - or the Libertarians are going to end up coming out of nowhere for wins in a future election cycle.
Lots of CCC in this and little to no facts. Wouldn't even be mad for Elizabeth Warren even if she pretends to be native american :lol.

You must be registered for see images
 

Multiply

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Kin
3💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Rubio and Christie really aren't being taken seriously as conservative candidates.

The people who are motivated to actually appear at the primaries have been talking people like Scott Walker and Ted Cruz. There are some who are considering Carson, but most aren't all that enthusiastic about any of the choices.

The GOP is pretty much done even within conservative circles. If they can force their way through the primaries by conscripting democrats to vote in the republican primaries (which they have done in the past) - then there are people who will vote for them simply because they aren't democrats, but most people have been pretty put off by the GOP, lately.

Most of the conservatives will find an independent to vote for just to not give the GOP any ideas that they have tacit approval to continue existing.



In a simple word: no.

There is a reason why she 're-launched' her campaign. That reason is the same reason she is not electable. Her speeches have more press than guests. Her 'talks with average people' have been shown to be campaign workers for the democratic party who weren't even told they were meeting Hillary until after they were committed.

No one likes her. She is a cold, vile woman who didn't think twice about giving the order to allow an ambassador to be killed rather than blow the lid on her program to arm Syrian rebels (who later became ISIS).

She gives flat, uninspiring speeches and acts as if the world owes her the presidency.

Yes, there are lobotomized zombies who will vote for her because she allegedly has a vagina and a D next to her name - but there are many within her own party who simply won't be motivated to vote for her - or be motivated to vote against her because she is so repulsive. Her book she wrote about being the Secretary of State? Complete and total flop. Book stores couldn't give it away. Compare this to books written about Obama's campaign, about Bush, or about Katniss.

The democrats will run Fauxahantas (Elizabeth Warren) over Hillary. One of the reasons they are letting Hillary act like she's going to run is because she needs to embezzle more money out of her 'charity' and because she knows where the skeletons are buried - Hillary is a Fratricide risk for the Democratic party - she'll slaughter another strong democratic candidate who tries to step out of line by airing out their dirty laundry and quite possibly getting a court conviction on them.

Obama won by appealing to the younger voter base that grew up during the late 80s and 90s. Polling data shows that voting demographic has swung -very- conservative over the past 4 years (the product doesn't stack up to the marketing) - not in who they support, but in their views on policy. Arguably, they are more Libertarian than Conservative - but that places them more in favor of candidates like Reagan than Clinton - which is a massive swing away from candidates like Obama.

That voting demographic comprises a considerable 12 year grouping, or so, and there hasn't been sufficient time for the 'disenfranchised youth' voting pool to re-stock. Motivating them in a similar fashion to get out and vote will be hard enough to repeat even if they had another Obama. Clinton is a pasty old white hag complete with a maniacal cackle. She belongs in a shack, stirring a cauldron; not sitting in the White House. The fact she has a dried up vagina isn't going to motivate even the disenfranchised youth to vote for some kind of hope and change.

Someone like Warren is infinitely more personable (though she's even more psychotically 'progressive').

Of course, Hillary should be on trial for multiple counts of treason, fraud, obstruction of justice, etc. If she manages to dodge several death sentences, she should never see the light of day, again.

Much less campaigning to be President.

But the GOP is incompetent and won't actually prosecute her because they think that the Democrats are going to give them a reach-around next time the big blue weenie gets crammed up their rectum. That is why Boehner is meeting with Obama to try and get the trade deal that gives Obama unilateral authority to negotiate trades passed through congress.

Or... whatever it does. No one who has seen the legislation is allowed to tell us what it says and even Pelosi is against giving the President that kind of authority.

Which is why the conservatives are about to boot the GOP out of the Republican party. That - or the Libertarians are going to end up coming out of nowhere for wins in a future election cycle.
Lots of CCC in this and little to no facts. Wouldn't even be mad for Elizabeth Warren even if she pretends to be native american :lol. Too bad she isn't running.

You must be registered for see images
 

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Lots of CCC in this and little to no facts.
Hun, there are plenty of facts. You're just ignorant of them:

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images


... So there are people down below, right?

You must be registered for see images


Oh...

But, at least she's doing okay in her 'scooby-van.' Right?



"Her Tuesday morning visit to a coffee shop in LeClaire, Iowa was staged from beginning to end, according to Austin Bird, one of the men pictured sitting at the table with Mrs. Clinton.

Bird told Daily Mail Online that campaign staffer Troy Price called and asked him and two other young people to meet him Tuesday morning at a restaurant in Davenport, a nearby city.

Price then drove them to the coffee house to meet Clinton after vetting them for about a half-hour.

The three got the lion's share of Mrs. Clinton's time and participated in what breathless news reports described as a 'roundtable'– the first of many in her brief Iowa campaign swing."


Oh...

Well, that was just a little bump in the road.



"A sunny day helped Hillary Clinton draw an audience of about 5,500 to a speech meant to reboot her presidential campaign on Saturday in New York City.
She spoke about a liberal wish-list of policies that will form the framework of what she hopes will be a more successful presidential run than the one she waged in 2008.
Cheers and applause interrupted her nearly 100 times. Her campaign made sure to mark each one in a transcript it distributed an hour later.
But the crowd itself was barely larger than the group who showed up on May 26 to hear Democratic socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders launch his campaign in sleepy Burlington, Vermont, a town of barely 42,000.
A massive overflow area with a Jumbotron screen sat unused as only a minuscule fraction of the New York City metroplex's 8.4 million Americans took the subway ride for the event. "


.... Oh....

But, at least she's getting some help from the media, right?



"It’s basically a given that the Clinton campaign will receive negative coverage from conservative-leaning outlets. On the other side of the aisle, Republican politicians have long understood that they’ll never get a fair shake from many/most national outlets. But only Hillary and her thin-skinned staffers treat such negative coverage as utterly unacceptable and worthy of retaliation.

By and large, national outlets are more than happy to ignore when conservative outlets are snubbed or the victims of unfair retaliation (just ask the Washington Free Beacon). But Hillary inconvenienced “respectable” outlets– the very same outlets her re-re-re-relaunch hoped to sway– earning negative coverage from the like of liberal outlets like The Guardian. And if 2008 proved anything, it’s that those are precisely the outlets that make or break Democratic campaigns."


... Oh ...

But she has a lot of followers, right? Like on social media?



"Although Hillary Clinton boasts a robust 3.6 million Twitter followers, not even a vast right-wing conspiracy would be able to interact with 2 million of them.
According to two popular online measuring tools, no more than 44 per cent of her Twitter fan base consists of real people who are active in using the social media platform.
And at least 15 per cent – more than 544,000 – are completely fake.
StatusPeople.com, the oldest publicly available Twitter-auditing tool, reports that 44 per cent of the former secretary of state's followers are 'good'; 15 per cent are 'fake'; and 41 per cent are 'inactive,' meaning that they never tweet or reply to any tweets."


... Oh ...

Hillary Clinton is just one of the only female politicians with a lot of name recognition. People recognize the name and pick it from a list of "who would you support?"

When it comes down to actually listening to her or when she gets put up next to someone else... and she's just a vile human being.

Wouldn't even be mad for Elizabeth Warren even if she pretends to be native american :lol. Too bad she isn't running.
Of course you'd want her to run.

She's a communist who believes in slave labor.
 
Top