Does a mother and father "truly" serve as a template for how you view males/females?

[Dreckerplayer]

Re: Does a mother and father "truly" serve as a template for how you view males/femal

Nice deflection.

It's not a "deflection", it has to reach, in the first place, to need to be deflected.

It's obvious you're a selectively thinker, so I totaled that you need to read my post thoroughly before responding. I cannot waste my time with you, seeing how unprepared you are.It's gonna be frustrating.

Don't try to line yourself up with me.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Re: Does a mother and father "truly" serve as a template for how you view males/femal

It's not a "deflection", it has to reach, in the first place, to need to be deflected.

It's obvious you're a selectively thinker, so I totaled that you need to read my post thoroughly before responding. I cannot waste my time with you, seeing how unprepared you are.It's gonna be frustrating.

Don't try to line yourself up with me.

Ok, fine. Let me ask you this.

In terms of the child's quality of living, what do you think is better, being in a foster home, or being adopted?

Simple question.

 

[Dreckerplayer]

Re: Does a mother and father "truly" serve as a template for how you view males/femal

Ok, fine. Let me ask you this.

In terms of the child's quality of living, what do you think is better, being in a foster home, or being adopted?

Simple question.

You see?There you go again.

You assume that adopting a child is any better.It's one sided. And you KNOW the answer to the foster home part. Nothing is guaranteed...nothing. And ofcourse, on materialistic terms, the adoptive parents must be financially FIT. But what good does that do?Preserve an empty life, full of "shoulda,coulda,woulda"s?