who gives a crap about ur $hittty receipts hunter...now stop anoying me ..My receipts say otherwise but okay.
who gives a crap about ur $hittty receipts hunter...now stop anoying me ..My receipts say otherwise but okay.
i heared keyboard is ur fav sword..leave me alone hunter!!!!!!..All over the fact I wouldn't spam in a thread with you on a stupid forum. So petty.
I see so they count agriculture to feed animals as part of crop irrigation. That won't matter overall unless the percentage diverted there is increasing year on year, and even if people go Vegan they will still be consuming more water (the diversion to crops will need to stay the same or at a similar level).Does it take into account the amount of crops grown worldwide to feed livestock with? I doubt it.
Animal agriculture isYou must be registered for see links.
You must be registered for see links
I'm not really bothered why a CEO is a vegan or care about it on a personal level.Look at the person who uploaded the link you shared. An executive at the Nature Conservancy and then read this link where a CEO of the same organization shares why he is vegan and why more ppl should be.
You must be registered for see linksPost automatically merged:
Do not deny the truth. :kappa:hey i may be every1 here but surely not him !!!!!!!!!!!!!!..
Keeping the joke aside, I made it very clear that I am not Minamoto's alt in our Discord DM conversation. You were not listening to me, so I decided to go along with it because I do not have the energy to argue with someone who has made up his mind.All over the fact I wouldn't spam in a thread with you on a stupid forum. So petty.
Yes, ofcourse, how do you think we feed roughly 70 billion livestock annualy who, individually, consume more crops than we do.I see so they count agriculture to feed animals as part of crop irrigation. That won't matter overall unless the percentage diverted there is increasing year on year, and even if people go Vegan they will still be consuming more water (the diversion to crops will need to stay the same or at a similar level).
I'm not really sure what your argument is here?
Also, why say almost 1/3 why not 3/10 which would be more correct?
I'm not really bothered why a CEO is a vegan or care about it on a personal level.
Kek. Must be an indian study.According to researchers, giving up dairy could drop a person's IQ by 13 points. Besides what's up with such desperate propaganda of vaganism in covid thread?
Kind of ignores my point.Yes, ofcourse, how do you think we feed roughly 70 billion livestock annualy who, individually, consume more crops than we do.
29% is factually equivalent to 3/10 not 33.3% which is 1/3.1/3 is factually correct as opposed to 3/10.
I'm not sure who mentioned less showering. I was specifically talking about needing to produce more crops to varying degrees which would also consume more water.Trying to help the environment by showering less, for example, is pointless if you eat one flesh hamburger once in two months.
Are you serious? I was just highlighting consumption breakdown, and am not bothered about his choices. There's a fine line between a fact and an opinion. To convince me veganism is right, would require convincing me being an omnivore is wrong. We've done that dance before and it didn't yield any results.Ofcourse you're not interested, but it's interesting how a CEO behind the source of the study you shared praised veganism as a solution on international TV.
Where did you get the idea that even after transitioning to a plant-based diet that the diversion of crops would be roughly the same? You do know that a plant-based diet on a large scale would mean roughly 8 times less land and double that, in terms of water would be saved while producing the same amount of calories as omnivorous diet? You're just trying your hardest here to google a counter argument while I've spent years looking at the data, peer-reviewed studies and also paying attention to where the funding would originate from.Kind of ignores my point.
29% is factually equivalent to 3/10 not 33.3% which is 1/3.
I'm not sure who mentioned less showering. I was specifically talking about needing to produce more crops to varying degrees which would also consume more water.
Are you serious? I was just highlighting consumption breakdown, and am not bothered about his choices. There's a fine line between a fact and an opinion. To convince me veganism is right, would require convincing me being an omnivore is wrong. We've done that dance before and it didn't yield any results.
It must be or you wouldn't be posting covid thread with veganism propaganda. Please do not spam. Off topic posts will be deleted. If you wish to discuss veganism, make your own thread on the topic instead of hijacking another for your cause.The bar on NB is still at an all-time low
yoyawn is actualy right..corona came from meatetarian who eat bats and frogs...It must be or you wouldn't be posting covid thread with veganism propaganda. Please do not spam. Off topic posts will be deleted. If you wish to discuss veganism, make your own thread on the topic instead of hijacking another for your cause.
There is a high chance that it was created in a lab. And you do not have to eat bat to catch infection from it. At times humans may get bat virus when getting in to contact with a fruit eaten/infected by it.yoyawn is actualy right..corona came from meatetarian who eat bats and frogs...
if bat eater was vegetarian...there would be no corona and health economic isues..
in televesion nd medias they say bat eater was source of covid...bat eater = meatotarian..There is a high chance that it was created in a lab. And you do not have to eat bat to catch infection from it. At times humans may get bat virus when getting in to contact with a fruit eaten/infected by it.
You must be registered for see links
Media... depends... we only have theoriesin televesion nd medias they say bat eater was source of covid...bat eater = meatotarian..