A universal concept of "wrong" and "right" needs to be established to benefit society as a whole. This is how we survive as a species.
The majority recognizes things such as murder, rape, causing harm to others physically/emotionally and greed are detrimental towards others. The majority recognizes that aforementioned actions fall under the category of "wrong". The majority agrees that such things should be outlawed.
What the majority demands, goes.
Of course there are certain things people disagree on such as homosexuality, the death penalty and abortion -- but these are things which are to blame on the desperate clinging to archaic beliefs and traditions. The concept of "wrong" and "right" itself has nothing to do with this; you cannot blame an idea based on what different individuals do with it, and then try to destroy it. Ideas will never be destroyed as long as there are people who hold onto them, and there will be. It is an essential factor in civilization, otherwise we would all regress to wild savages.
Trying to discard this concept is akin to destroying civilization itself.
Crimso Trickster, tell me, isn't it true that the majority has been wrong various times in history? No to mention,
majority is relative. Family, City, Country, World? We all affect each other, but what one majority says is right is different from another. And what gives any man the right to say his is better. We're all men, none is greater than another.
And as for we having to be civil for our sustination, of course. But there is one problem, you see.
Death. It happens. It is the unavoidable appointment we must all make. Yestderday, I went to the funeral of oen of my friends moms. He's in high-school, and had a wonderful mom, one who was very dear and kind to me as well. She was loved by so many, including myself. But guess what? NO matter what good she did, she's dead. It matters not. She is gone. ANythign she did here on earth matters not, if there is no eternity, for now she no longer exists. She is gone. And eventually, so will be everyone she helped. Rich, poor, weak, strong, smart, dumb, successful, wasteful, we all die. And when that happens, everything before does not matter, because, if there is no eternity, we are gone. All is vanity.
Seeing how we have so little time, and once we're dead, it supposedly matters not, then tell me why I should use that to help others, and not me. Moral obligation, I suppose? Now, why do we have moral obligation? What purpose is it? Tell me, please, who is that lawgiver? Why does the majority, whatever it is, matter? The majority's mind changes, and is subjective to what we reference. Even so the majority will die to. Why should we help one another, and not ourselves. SO what about ruin? Why do we even care about what happens, as long as we stay on top?
If it's just us, then there is only one's opinion and wants vs anothers', survival of the fittest.
The fact is this. None of us would go through with that. Now why? Why is it? Because we have a heart. No man would say it's okay to kidnap a helpless child, because he wants a slave. But this life is temporal, we will all die. If so is the case, then why not attempt to enjoy it? Why live under the submition of those who are equal to myself? For their benefit?
But, if there is a God, then we have reason, cause, hope, fear, purpose, accountability, an eternity, and much more. It's because of this that Doreen's life mattered. It's because I know now she is in heaven, as are all those who are Christians unto deathhhhhh...... okay I'm gong off topic, sorry.
I'm not saying I believe in the things previously said, I'm saying however that they make sense if there is no God.