Off topic but are you in the military?
Prior service, technically.
Put in 8 years.
No. I want to learn about other viewpoints. Challenging other viewpoints is a way for me to learn about other viewpoints. If you tell me that gravity isn't real, I'll challenge it because I want to know why you believe such a thing.
You wish to learn what is of immediate utility to your ambitions.
Do not confuse this with a genuine appreciation for learning.
I decide what is bullshit in my mind. I care about learning viewpoints when I initiate the argument or discussion. If I say something sarcastic to you, that does not mean I want you to drop knowledge on me. It simply means I was making a joke and it should be taken as such.
Ah, so let's all engage in a fun game of forum grab-ass and mutual sodomizing.
Monkeys are entertained by such antics and there are enough on this forum that I need not join.
Those are things that are interesting to you. If I share interest in those things I'll ask you about it or I will do my own research. You don't need to try to press your 'knowledge' on every single person you have a conversation with. It's simply not needed.
So I'm supposed to respond to you grabbing my ass by offering to give you felatio for your wonderful wit and humor?
Learn your place.
Just because someone is interested in learning that doesn't mean they're interested in what you have to teach. Say for example an Art major is in an art museum to learn about their field of study. According to your logic, since they're open to learn things, it's fine to barrage them with 'knowledge' about the universe and religion?
You'll find that when people say things I'm not interested in - I do not prompt them with a statement.
You will also find that if you read through what I'd stated - it applies very much so to the "gallery" we are currently in.
So off of that point, I'm interested in learning, but about things that interest me. Someone can try to drop knowledge of hockey on me and I won't care because I am not interested in hockey. If they dropped knowledge of basketball on my I'd listen because that's something I'm interested in. Does that mean I'll never find myself asking someone or Google-ing something about hockey? No.
Now if someone were to tell you that Hockey and Basketball were related concepts and shared a common history (not saying it is true - just as an example).
To believe subjects exist in isolation is the greatest impediment to the human mind I've ever witnessed.
@Bold, I really don't want to say it again. When did I ever say you spout bullshit? I said you regurgitate garbage and called what you were talking about bullshit. Not in the sense that it has no place in society, but in the sense of that's the adjective I decided to use.
Now we are going to play semantics?
I love this game.
You have no judgment, in person I'd beat the hell out of you trying to make a judgment.
You're more than welcome to try. I recommend you pack a blade. Within 10 meters, you won't have a firearm drawn before I'm there and it would be over in about three seconds - my boot, your neck. I don't punch and kick - that's for idiots who are in it for show, not to kill.
And, yes, my judgment of you stands. You're a small-minded fool who believes perfection revolves around what his mind can conceive. You're the type of person who would give the child everything he/she asks for to be his/her 'friend' if it didn't occur to you that the role of a parent is necessarily different from the role of a friend.
Who knows - perhaps you are one of those "I want my kid to be my friend" types. Always interesting watching that slow motion train wreck play out.
"Why doesn't the world conform to my view?"
"If I were God, I would make it so no one suffered. That's what a real God would do. If this world were perfect, where I got all that I wanted, I'd believe there was a God."
[video=youtube;77ueTRaYTwg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ueTRaYTwg[/video]
A world where we always got what we want would have absolutely no purpose. A world where there was no potential for pain and consequence would not be a world where we could have free will (at least, not among others with free will).
If you were to dedicate some of your time to contemplating -why- the universe does not conform to your views of perfection, perhaps you could come to peace with the fact that your view of perfection is narrowly defined by the constraints of self-interest.
It is somewhat odd, to me, that in a world where we have begun designing our own artificial universes we also still cling to old ideas we've already since abandoned in game design. In a good game - the player does not always taste success. The player is not spared the consequences of decisions - the game, once designed, churns on as an absolute set of principles and formulas.
If we will quickly become bored with games that will not challenge us - why, then, would any ideal universe of ours not present us with challenges? Why would it spare us the consequences of our decisions?
My judgment stands.
Until you have properly evaluated your place and purpose in the world - fear and misery is all you will ultimately know.