in part 1 he seemed cunning, complex like there was real insight to his nature, stuff he said was thought provoking and interesting, his existential philosophy was relatable and grounded in reality, flashbacks when he recruited children into the sound village showed how he was so evil to manipulate orphans and then use them as pawns even going as far as to use them as living sacrifices for edo tensei. He was a truly fascinating villain and mysterious at that, he had this whole system of underlings who helped him with his sick experiments he'd force people to fight to death in a dungeon just to decide who's body to take. He had no sense of mortality whatsoever and it made him so interesting, the fact he was so purely psychopathic and yet his underlings looked up to him as a father figure, but in reality they were nothing to him. Remember how hardcore it was when they encountered him in the FOD and when he pinned Anko to a tree or when he tore off his face to reveal he was in a stolen female body. He was scary and twisted as ****, hell there's a panel of him with dead bodies on the wall naked and dissected and severed limbs in jars and he's just calmly dissecting someone with blood all over him like Jesus that's seinen shit.
Then in part 2 he just became a parody of himself, showing incompetence and underestimating his opponents over and over again. Just sad that Kishimoto decided to make a mockery of a great villain in order to give the akatsuki the spotlight.
Then in part 2 he just became a parody of himself, showing incompetence and underestimating his opponents over and over again. Just sad that Kishimoto decided to make a mockery of a great villain in order to give the akatsuki the spotlight.
Last edited: