Apparently even if there's a sentence or 2 on the image, it's considered spam. Most of the time they were reaction pics with worded responses. I don't want to b!tch about it since I think 1 or 2 infractions were excused after I appealed.
My friend stayed over my house one time, and he was hanging out there for a while too. When I got banned, he was also banned too because the admin/mods thought it was an alt.
Because of that stupid assumption, they prolonged my ban and deleted my friends account when we were going on the base on our phones/tablet. We literally saw this together when we were chilling in the therapy pool.
Dude....if I say "all genjutsu is useless against Sakura" in a Kurenai vs Sakura match, I'm referring to THAT match. I don't need to specify because the thread is: Kurenai vs Sakura.
What's even worse is that I was replying back to someone who had quoted me:
There was no need to be specific when he asked me how Hashi dealt with Kurama's TBBs in that SPECIFIC match.
It's not that hard to understand but believe what you want Varia :sdo:
Doesn't matter to what you were referring to in your head, it's still wrong on paper.
I can say tobirama soloes on a akatsuki versus thread, and literally still get penalize for making that kind of a statement.
I could refer to Tobirama soloing half of akatsuki or he soloes kakazu in akastuki. Still wrong.
If it really bothers you this much, I'll take it down tomorrow.
My friend stayed over my house one time, and he was hanging out there for a while too. When I got banned, he was also banned too because the admin/mods thought it was an alt.
Because of that stupid assumption, they prolonged my ban and deleted my friends account when we were going on the base on our phones/tablet. We literally saw this together when we were chilling in the therapy pool.
Ouchhh. I got a bit pissed after it happened to me once but that's really bad. Did your friend have the account for long? A perma ban is never good :/
After my first ban. I wasn't aware that you had to wait for infractions to expire even after a ban so I was all eager to post due to people accusing me of getting banned for other reasons & other cool threads etc. Forgot about the no picture only reply rule again and got banned again for 3 days like an idiot My own fault lol now the caution kinda ruins posting a bit.
Ouchhh. I got a bit pissed after it happened to me once but that's really bad. Did your friend have the account for long? A perma ban is never good :/
After my first ban. I wasn't aware that you had to wait for infractions to expire even after a ban so I was all eager to post due to people accusing me of getting banned for other reasons & other cool threads etc. Forgot about the no picture only reply rule again and got banned again for 3 days like an idiot My own fault lol now the caution kinda ruins posting a bit.
It was my friends first ban and they thought it was me, so they banned it permanently.
It was never lifted since then and still...:dead:
I convinced him to make the account because he was addicted to that "League of Legends" game stuff and he just had to get off. Now he jumped back on World of War craft, so that didn't last very long. He may not of seen it as a problem, but I did when they banned me for five more days.
Doesn't matter to what you were referring to in your head, it's still wrong on paper.
I can say tobirama soloes on a akatsuki versus thread, and literally still get penalize for making that kind of a statement.
I could refer to Tobirama soloing half of akatsuki or he soloes kakazu in akastuki. Still wrong.
If it really bothers you this much, I'll take it down tomorrow.
I honestly don't get it or see any similarity, but I'm tired of spamming this thread so let's just leave it at that.
I can say tobirama soloes on a akatsuki versus thread, and literally still get penalize for making that kind of a statement.
I could refer to Tobirama soloing half of akatsuki or he soloes kakazu in akastuki. Still wrong.
"All" and "Any," are words you use when without any limitations. It's a misuse and very improper.
The worse part is that you didn't use a conjunction to your second sentence, you stopped with a period and proceeded on to talk about naruto.
In a Kurenai vs Sakura arc thread, you are saying Sakura is immune to all genjustus.
So in that literal context you're saying that every single genjustu is futile against Sakura, so genjusus like kushina wouldn't work anyway.
Edit: In fact the bm naruto you mentioned wasn't even in the second sentence, it was in the third. That's even worse.
In good English comprehension, one understands that "all" is a component of the subordinate clause and to which relates specifically to the scenario laid out in the main clause.
It is not good English to interpret each word in a sentence with a literal meaning or usage without paying attention to the context of which it is used; that is improper. And so is the clause "It's a misuse and very improper".
But since this isn't an English lesson, none of this has any bearing on whatever you were talking about originally.
In good English comprehension, one understands that "all" is a component of the subordinate clause and to which relates specifically to the scenario laid out in the main clause.
And that subject is the tailed beast bomb. Nothing was specified, the objective to his statement was too broad. That is what you call good "literature."
You're here justifying a vague sentence.
It is not good English to interpret each word in a sentence with a literal meaning or usage without paying attention to the context of which it is used; that is improper. And so is the clause "It's a misuse and very improper".
It is not proper to use very little detailed sentences in any written letter.
The context of the conversation was shinsuusenju's ability to catch TBB. And since you have very little information about what the theme of his post, you have no place to put your opinion.
But since this isn't an English lesson, none of this has any bearing on whatever you were talking about originally.
It was my friends first ban and they thought it was me, so they banned it permanently.
It was never lifted since then and still...:dead:
I convinced him to make the account because he was addicted to that "League of Legends" game stuff and he just had to get off. Now he jumped back on World of War craft, so that didn't last very long. He may not of seen it as a problem, but I did when they banned me for five more days.
Yeah. That would've rustled me. Especially if I had the account for a bit. If he got banned from WoW or LoL he probably would've reacted differently. :/
And that subject is the tailed beast bomb. Nothing was specified, the objective to his statement was too broad. That is what you call good "literature."
You're here justifying a vague sentence.
It is not proper to use very little detailed sentences in any written letter.
The context of the conversation was shinsuusenju's ability to catch TBB. And since you have very little information about what the theme of his post, you have no place to put your opinion.
Bold: You would think that part would of register to you before you decided to input your lesson about English.
It's not vague to anyone who has a half-decent grasp of English and had you so, you'd know straight away what he meant, just as I or anyone else did. You complained about his perfectly legitimate syntax to which I'm presuming is because you couldn't effectively counter his argument.
It's not little detailed either; it's perfectly coherent and that is the foundation of good English. It's kind of ironic that you're waggling your unqualified finger when you're the one using vague and incoherent phrasing. I quote "the objective to his statement was too broad"' - this is grammatically incorrect and bordering on incoherent. And that's worse than the previous quote I pointed out to you, since the main error with that was clunkiness.
And since my facts are directly related to the part of the conversation that I've involved myself in, they do have their place. That being, you droning on about a perfect piece of English when you kept on making sizeable blunders yourself.
It's not vague to anyone who has a half-decent grasp of English and had you so, you'd know straight away what he mean't, just as I or anyone else did. You complained about his perfectly legitimate syntax to which I'm presuming is because you couldn't effectively counter his argument.
Subjective. Every bit of this is completely, subjective.
I did provide a counter to his structure, and as I stated before, you did not see the full context of his post or the topic of that particular thread. So what I'm reading here is speculations.
If you even bothered to actually read (instead of this selective reading your are doing), would actually have a small grasp about what is going on here.
This was my retort for his example:
Demonic-Example: If I comment in a Kurenai vs War Arc Sakura thread in favor of Sakura and I say: "All genjutsu is avoided/overcome"
In a Kurenai vs Sakura arc thread, you are saying Sakura is immune to all genjustus.
So in that literal context you're saying that every single genjustu is futile against Sakura, so genjusus like kushina wouldn't work anyway.
It's not little detailed either; it's perfectly coherent and that is the foundation of good English. It's kind of ironic that you're waggling your unqualified finger when you're the one using vague and incoherent phrasing. I quote "the objective to his statement was too broad"' - this is grammatically incorrect and bordering on incoherent. And that's worse than the previous quote I pointed out to you, since the main error with that was clunkiness.
Bold: I hope you find this little phrase of yours every hypocritical and ironic.
The tailed beast bomb that he was being stated in that sentence was too broad, they're many variants of tailed beast bomb that has been used throughout the series. And there are many tailed beast bomb that the shinsuusenju could not catch for that matter. In fact, the susanoo sword tailed beast bomb that cut through the buddah's arm is a fine example of that.
So you there wagging you unqualified finger, why don't you try your hardest to avoid selective reading next time.
And since my facts are directly related to the part of the conversation that I've involved myself in, they do have their place. That being, you droning on about a perfect piece of English when you kept on making sizeable blunders yourself.
Making yourself involved means nothing, especially when you have little to no information on the topic at hand.
As for you, going around making corrections when you don't have the capability yourself is just pitiful.
"That being, you droning on about a perfect piece of English when you kept on making sizeable blunders yourself."
I'm here justifying my signature because the format and phrasing of his post proved my point.
You're here comparing sentence structure to spelling errors, which is basically on two different plan-fields.
This little conflict of demonic senju and I dated way back when you had no relevancy whatsoever, which means a lot more than several hours ago.
Subjective. Every bit of this is completely, subjective.
I did provide a counter to his structure, and as I stated before, you did not see the full context of his post or the topic of that particular thread. So what I'm reading here is speculations.
If you even bothered to actually read (instead of this selective reading your are doing), would actually have a small grasp about what is going on here.
This was my retort for his example:
Response
Bold: I hope you find this little phrase of yours every hypocritical and ironic.
The tailed beast bomb that he was being stated in that sentence was too broad, they're many variants of tailed beast bomb that has been used throughout the series. And there are many tailed beast bomb that the shinsuusenju could not catch for that matter. In fact, the susanoo sword tailed beast bomb that cut through the buddah's arm is a fine example of that.
So you there wagging you unqualified finger, why don't you try your hardest to avoid selective reading next time.
Making yourself involved means nothing, especially when you have little to no information on the topic at hand.
As for you, going around making corrections when you don't have the capability yourself is just pitiful.
"That being, you droning on about a perfect piece of English when you kept on making sizeable blunders yourself."
I'm here justifying my signature because the format and phrasing of his post proved my point.
You're here comparing sentence structure to spelling errors, which is basically on two different plan-fields.
This little conflict of demonic senju and I dated way back when you had no relevancy whatsoever, which means a lot more than several hours ago.
You're making yourself look worse and worse, because I had actually read the posts over. I haven't been selective reading at all, I've addressed all of your points so it's actually quite hypocritical for you to sit there pointing out perfectly legitimate syntax when you've been using poor English, and then to accuse me of selective reading when I've addressed all of your points. You're the one making things up as you go along like some kind of poor anime filler. It's feeble and worthless to do so because it doesn't bode well on your appearance.
You keep talking about Bijūdamas when that's not what I've been addressing; why bring up something unrelated to my personal issue against you? Have some decorum and stop making excuses. It was very clear from the beginning that I was talking about your unrighteous nitpicking towards a perfect piece of English.
Plus, you bolded out sizeable when it's actually good English and had you spoke good English, you'd know that. Every piece of English in this thread posted by me has been flawless, so yes, I'm far more qualified to judge in that regard than you will seemingly ever be.
His post proved nothing except that your English skills leave a lot to be desired. In all honesty, I couldn't care less about yours and his pathetic squabble; I came here to call you out on one thing and one thing only and I've done so.
You're making yourself look worse and worse, because I had actually read the posts over. I haven't been selective reading at all, I've addressed all of your points so it's actually quite hypocritical for you to sit there pointing out perfectly legitimate syntax when you've been using poor English, and then to accuse me of selective reading when I've addressed all of your points. You're the one making things up as you go along like some kind of poor anime filler. It's feeble and worthless to do so because it doesn't bode well on your appearance.
See this is nothing but using my words as a means of retaliation.
"No, you're using selective reading."
"No, you're English is poor."
Pointing fingers while straying away from the topic at hand.
By keeping his quote under my signature is now poor English?
You keep talking about Bijūdamas when that's not what I've been addressing; why bring up something unrelated to my personal issue against you? Have some decorum and stop making excuses. It was very clear from the beginning that I was talking about your unrighteous nitpicking towards a perfect piece of English.
What the hell is wrong with you?
Bijuudama is the subject to my entire conversation.
Your senseless argument on grammatical error is unrelated to my response to demonic.
It's damn well clear that you have a hard time paying attention.
Plus, you bolded out sizeable when it's actually good English and had you spoke good English, you'd know that. Every piece of English in this thread posted by me has been flawless, so yes, I'm far more qualified to judge in that regard than you will seemingly ever be.
1. Bolded is not a verb and it is completely improper.
2. And if you want to post about proper English, your pathetic post will not be in contractions.
Because that is not "good English."
3. Size-able not sizeable
4. Size-able should never be used to describe anything else unrelated to height and weight in a proper setting.
5. Clearly you are not qualified to judge, because with that error infested grammar of yours, you just keep making yourself look more like an idiot.
6. It's "speak" not "spoke."
His post proved nothing except that your English skills leave a lot to be desired. In all honesty, I couldn't care less about yours and his pathetic squabble; I came here to call you out on one thing and one thing only and I've done so.
My own fault lol now the caution kinda ruins posting a bit.
