[Discussion] Death Note after[SPOILER]

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Why does everybody say "the show sucked" after L dies? I cannot understand why anybody has that opinion (unless they're fanboys/girls). Please, if this is your opinion, explain it to me so I can understand.

I like both sides equally. I liked seeing Light and L's cat and mouse game but that had to end sooner or later. Light also had to be caught at one point but if L did it, it would have been way too soon. I mean come on, the whole Yotsuba arc would have been pointless. I liked Light's shock of Mello and Near closing in on him and getting in his way over and over.

People say they hate Near when he had similar traits to L who they hold in such a great light. Do you dislike him because he is the third L (I should say second but that was Light)? I don't understand. Or maybe because L was the most intelligent yet he still lost? I can understand that but you have to take Light's intelligence into account - he's no pushover himself.


Please, if this is your opinion, explain it to me so I can understand. :win:
 

Naruto rikuduo mode

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
574
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

I really dont like the story after L dies only for two reasons light dies,L dies both are my favorite and NEAR wasnt as good as L he just get lucky and caught light because of mikamis foolishness,NEAR just got lucky thats all and i am a supporter of kira, he was real justce
 

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

First of all why post a spoiler as a thread title?

that's not cool, not that i didnt finish it BUT you're spoiling the fun for others.

OT: the show didnt suck after L died.
I'm sorry, the thought didn't cross my mind. In future, I will. If you're reading this and I've spoiled it for you, I apologise.

I agree and I wanted to find out the opinion of others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Braveknight

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

I really dont like the story after L dies only for two reasons light dies,L dies both are my favorite and NEAR wasnt as good as L he just get lucky and caught light because of mikamis foolishness,NEAR just got lucky thats all and i am a supporter of kira, he was real justce
Mikami was actually really clever and that's why Light chose him. Saying that he was foolish means that you're saying that Light was foolish. Near did not get lucky. He used Mello to force Mikami into a dire situation. He outplayed Light. Matsuda also has the theory that Near used the Death Note on Mikami to make him slip up since he died in prison ten days later. Neither of these contain luck.
 

Alfred Pennyworth

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
3,787
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

I don't particularly think the latter half sucked that much in terms of storyline......
light and near pissing each other off has been great entertainment

but sth about M/N that kinda bothered me is that they were doing this like playing games/solving puzzles...
which might have been vital to defeating kira/ giving characters uniqueness
tho I feel that L's sense of justice/resolve has to be inherited in a more explicit way
 

Naruto rikuduo mode

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
574
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

mikami was actually really clever and that's why light chose him. Saying that he was foolish means that you're saying that light was foolish. Near did not get lucky. He used mello to force mikami into a dire situation. He outplayed light. Matsuda also has the theory that near used the death note on mikami to make him slip up since he died in prison ten days later. Neither of these contain luck.
if mikami hasnt used death note publicly on the train then everything were alright and only for that is why i said he was foolish
 

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

I don't particularly think the latter half sucked that much in terms of storyline......
light and near pissing each other off has been great entertainment

but sth about M/N that kinda bothered me is that they were doing this like playing games/solving puzzles...
which might have been vital to defeating kira/ giving characters uniqueness
tho I feel that L's sense of justice/resolve has to be inherited in a more explicit way
I thought L did it because it interested him and he hates losing. Didn't somebody say that L only takes on cases that he finds interesting or has personal connections to?

With L, it was always one on one. U_U


After L, it was gang rape for Light.
How so gang rape? In the sense that he was unable to handle both Mello and Near? Then I agree.
 

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

if mikami hasnt used death note publicly on the train then everything were alright and only for that is why i said he was foolish
That was part of Light's plan to kill Near. He planned on making Mikami suspicious so Near would steal a fake notebook and Mikami would kill Near on the day of the warehouse meeting.
 

Naruto rikuduo mode

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
574
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

That was part of Light's plan to kill Near. He planned on making Mikami suspicious so Near would steal a fake notebook and Mikami would kill Near on the day of the warehouse meeting.
no mikami used death note on the train when NEARS man was on train and he saw two people died then again when after light wrote name of MISS TAKADA right after her death mikami write her name
 

Alfred Pennyworth

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
3,787
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

I thought L did it because it interested him and he hates losing. Didn't somebody say that L only takes on cases that he finds interesting or has personal connections to?
oh right L actually denied he solved cases for justice in the one-shot special
dunno why I have always had that feeling
 

TheRedAndGreenBeast

Active member
Regular
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
1,686
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

no mikami used death note on the train when NEARS man was on train and he saw two people died then again when after light wrote name of MISS TAKADA right after her death mikami write her name
No, the train incident happened before the death of Takada. Like I said before, Light made Mikami publicly kill people so Near would try to take his notebook which was supposed to be a fake. Near, however, switched the fake and the real notebooks so Mikami ended up with the fake one and Near had the real one. *According to Matsuda's theory* Near then used the real Death Note to make Mikami not check if his notebook was real or fake and to come toe the warehouse, go mad and die in prison. When Mello captured Takada and Takada contacted Mikami, Mikami moved to kill Takada but wrote it in the fake notebook which is why Light's method of death (burning) worked.
 

Cauzing

Active member
Elite
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
7,271
Kin
3๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
3๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

No, the train incident happened before the death of Takada. Like I said before, Light made Mikami publicly kill people so Near would try to take his notebook which was supposed to be a fake. Near, however, switched the fake and the real notebooks so Mikami ended up with the fake one and Near had the real one. *According to Matsuda's theory* Near then used the real Death Note to make Mikami not check if his notebook was real or fake and to come toe the warehouse, go mad and die in prison. When Mello captured Takada and Takada contacted Mikami, Mikami moved to kill Takada but wrote it in the fake notebook which is why Light's method of death (burning) worked.
No Mikami went to the Bank, where the real Notebook was and wrote the Name of Takada in the Book one minute after Light did it, that's why Lights method of death worked. The guy who followed Mikami came to the clue that this was the real one and switched it later with a fake one.

In my mind Lights death was stupid af. Compare the plan to trick L and the plan to trick Near. The plan against L was master mind. And later on against Near, Light didn't think that Near would also think that Light was going to switch the Notebook with a fake one? That was so stupid tbh...
 

Naruto rikuduo mode

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
574
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Re: Death Note after L dies

No, the train incident happened before the death of Takada. Like I said before, Light made Mikami publicly kill people so Near would try to take his notebook which was supposed to be a fake. Near, however, switched the fake and the real notebooks so Mikami ended up with the fake one and Near had the real one. *According to Matsuda's theory* Near then used the real Death Note to make Mikami not check if his notebook was real or fake and to come toe the warehouse, go mad and die in prison. When Mello captured Takada and Takada contacted Mikami, Mikami moved to kill Takada but wrote it in the fake notebook which is why Light's method of death (burning) worked.
maybe but i dont remember when light say to mikami for kill publicly and what u say about matsuda theory is right,mikami got the fake one but i really dont remember about light saying to mikami for killing publicly
 

Aomine Daiki

Active member
Elite
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
7,307
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Why does everybody say "the show sucked" after L dies? I cannot understand why anybody has that opinion (unless they're fanboys/girls). Please, if this is your opinion, explain it to me so I can understand.

I like both sides equally. I liked seeing Light and L's cat and mouse game but that had to end sooner or later. Light also had to be caught at one point but if L did it, it would have been way too soon. I mean come on, the whole Yotsuba arc would have been pointless. I liked Light's shock of Mello and Near closing in on him and getting in his way over and over.

People say they hate Near when he had similar traits to L who they hold in such a great light. Do you dislike him because he is the third L (I should say second but that was Light)? I don't understand. Or maybe because L was the most intelligent yet he still lost? I can understand that but you have to take Light's intelligence into account - he's no pushover himself.


Please, if this is your opinion, explain it to me so I can understand. :win:
it didn't suck after L died it was just a bit less good. BTW Near is annoying... L was weird and funny! he deserved to be the one to catch kira
 

Kisake

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
52
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
From my opinion Near just wasn't a great character. I fee like he was just an halfassed L. Not a true successor. I've said in another post that imitation is the poorest form on flattery. He's what I consider a non-rememberable character.
 
Top