I have looked through some of the databooks, and clearly they contain many contradictions with the manga. Kishi is listed as the author on all of them, but yet these contradictions occur.
Mainly it is age problems, like saying Kakashi was 5 when he graduated, but clearly he graduated along with many others, who all are listed to be older at the time of graduation, but their age is the same. For instance Obito and Kakashi are the same age according to the 2nd databook, but kakashi graduated academy at 5, chunin at 6, and obito academy at 9, chunin at 11.. And this isn't the only case.
Now this clearly says they couldn't have participated in the same chunin exam, unless they let students at the academy participate in chunin exams before actually graduating to a genin.
The 2nd databook was made/published around the time of Kakashis gaiden, so it doesn't make sense if Kishi made such a big mistake.
So it sort of suggest that Kishi probably didn't write everything on his own. So how valid does this make the evidence of the databooks? I can bring up other examples such as jutsus that are highly over-exaggerated compared to how they really appear, etc..
Obviously what is stated in the manga overrules the databooks, but how useful are the databooks then, when Kishi can just overrule them anytime he wants? If the Databook says something that isn't directly stated in the manga, is it then still valid as evidence?
Mainly it is age problems, like saying Kakashi was 5 when he graduated, but clearly he graduated along with many others, who all are listed to be older at the time of graduation, but their age is the same. For instance Obito and Kakashi are the same age according to the 2nd databook, but kakashi graduated academy at 5, chunin at 6, and obito academy at 9, chunin at 11.. And this isn't the only case.
Now this clearly says they couldn't have participated in the same chunin exam, unless they let students at the academy participate in chunin exams before actually graduating to a genin.
The 2nd databook was made/published around the time of Kakashis gaiden, so it doesn't make sense if Kishi made such a big mistake.
So it sort of suggest that Kishi probably didn't write everything on his own. So how valid does this make the evidence of the databooks? I can bring up other examples such as jutsus that are highly over-exaggerated compared to how they really appear, etc..
Obviously what is stated in the manga overrules the databooks, but how useful are the databooks then, when Kishi can just overrule them anytime he wants? If the Databook says something that isn't directly stated in the manga, is it then still valid as evidence?