creation vs evolution.

[FreakensteinAG]

That's the same as the evolution theory. See, you're getting closer now!

Evolution is not a guess. Evolution is the backbone of Biology, which contains mounds upon mounds of evidence to support it. Every semester in every university on the planet, there is more evidence gained to support Evolution.

What we are asking is the fossil of the common ancestor that humans evolved from, and it proves that it does belong to the common ancestor. And it gives explanation to how the common ancestor was brought up and such. Bringing me that link you posted, which you haven't read yourself, is not a proof since I basically quoted what the article itself said about the fossil: ''still unanswered questions''.

You are asking for the direct common ancestor of a species, which is a Biological Fallacy. There are no direct ancestors of ANY species. Every generation is Evolution, albeit a very slight, incremental change. As I've said before, it takes several thousand generations of a species to represent a significant deviation from its original.

It doesn't matter who he/she is; he/she is still better than you and I at biology. Here you go:

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

Both are scientists with a degree in biology that you and me will never achieve, and both disagree with evolution.

I have a Bachelor's degree in Biology! If you stuck around in Narutobase enough, you would have known this XD

"Dr." Hovind does not have any degrees from any accredited institutions. He graduated in Midwestern Baptist College with a degree in Christian Education. He has no background in Science education, he's a nut! If you want TRUE Biology education, read a Biology textbook. It will do your mind well. I feel bad that you've already been indoctrinated by bullshit.

 

[Bronze]

Evolution is not a guess. Evolution is the backbone of Biology, which contains mounds upon mounds of evidence to support it. Every semester in every university on the planet, there is more evidence gained to support Evolution.

You are doing it again; twisting the meaning of theory to a fact. Evolution is a theory and not a fact.

You are asking for the direct common ancestor of a species, which is a Biological Fallacy. There are no direct ancestors of ANY species. Every generation is Evolution, albeit a very slight, incremental change. As I've said before, it takes several thousand generations of a species to represent a significant deviation from its original.

Oh really? So Homo habilis's genes left significant presence in modern human's genes? :lol I'll quote what your article said: ''still unanswered questions''. Trying to twist it even more at this point is plain funny.

I have a Bachelor's degree in Biology! If you stuck around in Narutobase enough, you would have known this

Guess what? The ones debunking the evolution theory have PHD or Professor degree in biology, so they are years ahead of you, sir.
I don't have time for NB, and I never claimed to be an expert in biology. I only need to get an expert to prove my point, which I did. So that is all to it. :bye:

 

[Multiply]

You are doing it again; twisting the meaning of theory to a fact. Evolution is a theory and not a fact.

I don't think you understand that you're using broken logic. Gravity is a theory bud.

 

[FreakensteinAG]

You are doing it again; twisting the meaning of theory to a fact. Evolution is a theory and not a fact.



Oh really? So Homo habilis's genes left significant presence in modern human's genes? :lol I'll quote what your article said: ''still unanswered questions''. Trying to twist it even more at this point is plain funny.



Guess what? The ones debunking the evolution theory have PHD or Professor degree in biology, so they are years ahead of you, sir.
I don't have time for NB, and I never claimed to be an expert in biology. I only need to get an expert to prove my point, which I did. So that is all to it. :bye:

1. I've never once asserted that a Scientific Theory was a fact. I'm educating you that Scientific Theories have more legitimate backing than Layman Theories. The fact that Evolution is a Scientific Theory means it contains mounds of evidence to support it, effectively making it correct to seven deviations, but not 100% correct. No scientist worth his salt would ever claim a Scientific Theory 100% fact, that would defeat the purpose of science. Only organized religion claims something as 100% correct.

2. I never linked to anything on Homo habilis? Are you even reading what I submit? But yes, they did. They contributed to the phenotypic frequency of our genes. That's what breeding does. You shuffle the genes a parents have and transmit certain copies to your child. Thus, every generation is different from the last generation. It's how Evolution works.

3. Kent Hovind DOES NOT have a PHD in Biology. Do I have to say this a third time? He has no education in Biology. He's no expert, he's a schmuck.

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

LOL OWNED!

Dr. David Kitts, professor of geology at the University of Oklahoma said, “Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them….” And Lord Zuckerman admitted there are no “fossil traces” of transformation from an ape-like creature to man! Even Stephen J. Gould of Harvard admitted, “The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change.” I assume that all college professors know that Darwin admitted the same fact. (I also assume they know that Darwin was not trained as a scientist but for the ministry, so evolutionists are worshipping at the feet of an apostate preacher!)

Famous fossil expert, Niles Eldredge confessed, “…geologists have found rock layers of all divisions of the last 500 million years and no transitional forms were contained in them.” Dr. Eldredge further said, “…no one has yet found any evidence of such transitional creatures.”

 

[Strict]

Creation is bullshit as it is based on nothing but baseless believes. Science works on discovering new things, religious people are sitting on their asses, read their "holy" books and think this is all they need to know about the world.

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

Creation is bullshit as it is based on nothing but baseless believes. Science works on discovering new things, religious people are sitting on their asses, read their "holy" books and think this is all they need to know about the world.

Ahhh the same science that essentially ripped off Vedanta.

 

[Strict]

Ahhh the same science that essentially ripped off Vedanta.

Science isn't perfect and doesn't claim to be. It constantly improves its theories with researches and new insights. Unlike religions, which are nothing but myths created by humans 2000-3000 years ago in an archaic era, who searched for simple answers for their origin and the origin of the world.

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

Science isn't perfect and doesn't claim to be. It constantly improves its theories with researches and new insights. Unlike religions, which are nothing but myths created by humans 2000-3000 years ago in an archaic era, who searched for simple answers for their origin and the origin of the world.

Yet everything in the Vedas, is essentially what european science ripped off and then altered for their own profit.

 

[Avani]

Yet everything in the Vedas, is essentially what european science ripped off and then altered for their own profit.

Seriously? Stop right there. Vedanta simply makes it easier to accept evolution. It may have a similar idea but your suggestion of rip off for profit is ludicrous. You are not doing Vedanta any favours. Take it easy.

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

Seriously? Stop right there. Vedanta simply makes it easier to accept evolution. It may have a similar idea but your suggestion of rip off for profit is ludicrous. You are not doing Vedanta any favours. Take it easy.

The vedas doesn't mention evolution whatsoever, which is a materialistic form of transmigration.

 

[Avani]

The vedas doesn't mention evolution whatsoever, which is a materialistic form of transmigration.

Yeah that's why you need to stop posting about it.

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

Yeah that's why you need to stop posting about it.

Yeah nah. Evolution is a rip off of reincarnation.

 

[Avani]

Yeah nah. Evolution is a rip off of reincarnation.

Are you trying to scare away the creationists from accepting evolution even more or what?

 

[SasukeTheEmo]

Are you trying to scare away the creationists from accepting evolution even more or what?

Only for macro-evolution.

 

[FreakensteinAG]

Yeah nah. Evolution is a rip off of reincarnation.

You have zero idea on what Evolution is if you believe it is a rip off of reincarnation.

 

[QueenPrincess Legendary]

I believe in the Bible and what God said happened and how we were created and the evolution.

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

You know, Evolutuion doesn't actually disagree with anything in the bible. It's an explanation as to how creatures change over time, not why religion is wrong.

 

[Multiply]

You know, Evolutuion doesn't actually disagree with anything in the bible. It's an explanation as to how creatures change over time, not why religion is wrong.

Bud...

You must be registered for see images

 

[Dark Sonic]

Creation.