Creation of the Universe?

[Holy Cross]

I believe in theism.

what if this god or whoever, you say is LOKI.!!(FROM THOR)

if god did create then does he have a wife, son, mother, daughter.??

don't just say god and be done with it, tell me how do you perceive the so called god.??

Not a good example, bro

You must be registered for see links

Paganism has a VERY different set of rules.

 

[FreakensteinAG]

I wud love to hear about it...!!

The premise of String Theory is that the universe is expanding. And we can see that happening today in real time. We are moving farther apart from each other a little bit at a time. And it also means that the fabric of space is getting colder too. But anyway, the idea is that the universe is an expanding "soap bubble" if you will, and we are dust particles on this soap bubble.

In this analogy, we know that soap bubbles cleave to form new bubbles, or simply collide.

But this is as simple as I can explain it, because I can't even begin to fathom the mathematics behind this, and I'm only in a CalcIV class in college.

So the cleaving or collision of this analogous soap bubble is "the big bang". It's what sets off this tremendous amount of energy which was always present, like the collision of tectonic plates to produce earthquakes.

And the entire premise of String theory opens up the idea that there are multiple universes out there. And some day in the long, distant future, we will be able to visit them, either by curiosity or by necessity.

 

[The Sach]

Big bang theory.U_U

 

[Oksus]

The premise of String Theory is that the universe is expanding. And we can see that happening today in real time. We are moving farther apart from each other a little bit at a time. And it also means that the fabric of space is getting colder too. But anyway, the idea is that the universe is an expanding "soap bubble" if you will, and we are dust particles on this soap bubble.

In this analogy, we know that soap bubbles cleave to form new bubbles, or simply collide.

But this is as simple as I can explain it, because I can't even begin to fathom the mathematics behind this, and I'm only in a CalcIV class in college.

So the cleaving or collision of this analogous soap bubble is "the big bang". It's what sets off this tremendous amount of energy which was always present, like the collision of tectonic plates to produce earthquakes.

And the entire premise of String theory opens up the idea that there are multiple universes out there. And some day in the long, distant future, we will be able to visit them, either by curiosity or by necessity.

What does string theory say about the matter and energy though?

 

[Made in Heaven]

It's likely String Theory gives a proper explanation as to the creation of the universe, because it takes you before "The Big Bang".

It still doesn't explain much, only that there are tons of realities.... Which I'm fine with, for the record.

 

[FreakensteinAG]

What does string theory say about the matter and energy though?

As with matter and energy, because the multiple universes, as Dr. Kaku explained it, are the culprits behind the cleaving and collisions to produce new universes, the idea is that the matter has always been there in cycles.

Yes, the first law of Thermodynamics explains that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. So what does that leave us? This energy was changed, transported, or manipulated.

The second law also states that this manipulation of energy creates disorder due to the randomness of the energy transferal. But this only works in a controlled, closed environment, and we know that the universe is definitely not a closed system.

So we are left with "this energy has always been around, always shifting and being transferred in a cycle". It's like trying to trace the first time we process ATP, our energy source within our bodies. We can't! And it's unfair in a debate to assume we can. Because it's a cycle, like a circle.

 

[reizon]

Nothing is perfect, I agree with. Bit this is only in the creation. Humans, jinns, angels, animals, plants.... All have flaws or imperfections. Allah is not part of creation, he is the creator.

god is genderless.!!

so you mean to say that god just appeared out of nowhere in the middle of nowhere and got bored and decided to create the universe.!!

god doesn't have origin.??

 

[From the Dark Spire]

Well I know that.

There's someone I know who goes from being an "Athiest" to a "Satan worshipper" to... probably something else now.
Get's me confused.


This is so accurate it hurts.

Indeed, it's the truth.

 

[Made in Heaven]

god is genderless.!!

so you mean to say that god just appeared out of nowhere in the middle of nowhere and got bored and decided to create the universe.!!

god doesn't have origin.??

Didn't I go over this with you already? Do I need to repeat myself, sweetie?

 

[reizon]

The premise of String Theory is that the universe is expanding. And we can see that happening today in real time. We are moving farther apart from each other a little bit at a time. And it also means that the fabric of space is getting colder too. But anyway, the idea is that the universe is an expanding "soap bubble" if you will, and we are dust particles on this soap bubble.

In this analogy, we know that soap bubbles cleave to form new bubbles, or simply collide.

But this is as simple as I can explain it, because I can't even begin to fathom the mathematics behind this, and I'm only in a CalcIV class in college.

So the cleaving or collision of this analogous soap bubble is "the big bang". It's what sets off this tremendous amount of energy which was always present, like the collision of tectonic plates to produce earthquakes.

And the entire premise of String theory opens up the idea that there are multiple universes out there. And some day in the long, distant future, we will be able to visit them, either by curiosity or by necessity.

I heard string theory proves or stated that universes are like packets stacked together, is that true.??

how string theory comes to existence of multiple universe.??

 

[Oksus]

As with matter and energy, because the multiple universes, as Dr. Kaku explained it, are the culprits behind the cleaving and collisions to produce new universes, the idea is that the matter has always been there in cycles.

Yes, the first law of Thermodynamics explains that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. So what does that leave us? This energy was changed, transported, or manipulated.

The second law also states that this manipulation of energy creates disorder due to the randomness of the energy transferal. But this only works in a controlled, closed environment, and we know that the universe is definitely not a closed system.

So we are left with "this energy has always been around, always shifting and being transferred in a cycle". It's like trying to trace the first time we process ATP, our energy source within our bodies. We can't! And it's unfair in a debate to assume we can. Because it's a cycle, like a circle.

My theory that quarks are just energy vibrating in certain direction. And that pure energy is impossible for us to observe due to the fact that it does not vibrate, in other words is a constant zero, yet an infinite zero.

Does it fit with the string theory ?

 

[reizon]

Didn't I go over this with you already? Do I need to repeat myself, sweetie?

we have never talked about the origin of god itself..!!
I have 99 VM message to prove that.!!

you were only blabbering away with how god created everything.!!

and sweetie.!! Nice touch.!! XD

 

[FreakensteinAG]

My theory that quarks are just energy vibrating in certain direction. And that pure energy is impossible for us to observe due to the fact that it does not vibrate, in other words is a constant zero, yet an infinite zero.

Does it fit with the string theory ?

I have no idea I haven't gotten into that complex of physics. That is NOT my specialization lol

 

[reizon]

I have no idea I haven't gotten into that complex of physics. That is NOT my specialization lol

answer my post sensei.!!

 

[Oksus]

I have no idea I haven't gotten into that complex of physics. That is NOT my specialization lol

In your opinion though, does it seem plausible ?

 

[Made in Heaven]

we have never talked about the origin of god itself..!!
I have 99 VM message to prove that.!!

you were only blabbering away with how god created everything.!!

and sweetie.!! Nice touch.!! XD

Hm, must've been someone else then.

No offense to you Reizon, but I feel the question of who created for is one of the stupidest arguments one could use.
If you asked who created god, then I'll ask, then who created God's creator? And who created that creator? And who was his creator? And who was HIS creator? And who created him?

An infinite regress of causes is impossible. There has to be an uncaused cause. A cause, something that is there, without any previous cause. Think of it like a strong of dominos.... You're always gonna need that first domino.

 

[Oksus]

Hm, must've been someone else then.

No offense to you Reizon, but I feel the question of who created for is one of the stupidest arguments one could use.
If you asked who created god, then I'll ask, then who created God's creator? And who created that creator? And who was his creator? And who was HIS creator? And who created him?

An infinite regress of causes is impossible. There has to be an uncaused cause. A cause, something that is there, without any previous cause. Think of it like a strong of dominos.... You're always gonna need that first domino.

Energy is what you are looking for.

 

[Made in Heaven]

Energy is what you are looking for.

Energy has no will nor intelligence, and it too, much like matter, must have been created.

 

[Oksus]

Energy has no will nor intelligence, and it too, much like matter, must have been created.

I'm not talking about observable energy.

The energy I am talking about is both knowledge and conscience itself.

 

[Made in Heaven]

I'm not talking about observable energy.

O? Expand upon this...