In a society where racial tensions are high, you're suggesting that the idea of her being pulled over because of the color of her car is just as probable as her being pulled over because she's black? That's an astounding false equivalence.
Even the attorney asked what the reason was for her being pulled over and the cop gave no credible answer. He just fumbled his words.
In the context of the video, yes. Yes, that's what I'm suggesting. And you cannot suggest otherwise; like the weasels who analyzed this video, you would have to create a context (e.i. a narrative) in which the motives of the police were racially based. Essentially, the perception of cops being racist preexisted the traffic stop in the video or any act of true racism.
So yes, there is absolutely more evidence to her being pulled over for being black than because of the color of her car.
"No credible answer, therefore racism"
There is no evidence. Your using abstract generalizations to justify claiming this traffic stop being racially motivated. It's no better when people use abstract generalizations to justify claiming a black person is at fault when stopped by the police a without having any objective evidence to back their claim.
In the context of this new coverage, it's entirely narrative driven and that narrative is that the police are outrageously racist and are out to target minorities. When you believe racism is everywhere, you find racism everywhere, and if racism is everywhere, youre sure to find racists around every corner. I'd imagine from some feminist's perspective, they would have seen this as an act of sexism at the hands of mysogynist pigs carrying the will of patriarchal America.
