Masakari
Member
98 posts
20 reactions
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2012
- Messages
- 98
- Status
- Activity Streak
Hey.
I was just wondering if someone else could explain this part of the Manga to me:
Madara clearly states that he had four brothers. Using "had" implies that he doesn't anymore (at that point in the flashback), while the topic of conversation between Madara and Hashirama at the time was about siblings dieing, so ultimately, it's safe to jump into the conclusion that Madara's four siblings had also died. Now, we don't know who all of his four siblings were, but we do know that Izuna was one of them.
However, how could all of Madara's four siblings have died such a long time ago, when clearly, Izuna was alive long after that:
Quote-Result: They were considered top of the Uchiha later on, not at the current point in the flashback of the manga (You can even tell by the pictures, Izuna's far older than Hashi, Tobi & Madara are in the present-flashback), so logically speaking, Izuna isn't dead in the current flashback, yet, Madara stated that all of his four siblings died as well.
And by this, I wan to ask the actual question:
1. Is this just a mistake by Kishi?
2. Could Madara & Hashirama be referring to their whole respective "Clan" as "Brothers" instead of their actual Siblings, Since that would make the statements more valid?
3. Explain
I'm assuming the 2nd option is the real one, I just want to hear what you guys think about it. I'd personally guess they're referring to their whole clan as brothers, but then again, surely more than 4 Uchihas (Madaras "brothers") had died up until this point as well, so it's rather strange, still, which makes me still believe that Madara was in fact referring to actual siblings, in which case it's wrong.
I was just wondering if someone else could explain this part of the Manga to me:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Code:
[color="red"]Madara:[/color] I have four brothers...
[color="red"]Madara:[/color] Or rather, I [b]had[/b] four brothers.Madara clearly states that he had four brothers. Using "had" implies that he doesn't anymore (at that point in the flashback), while the topic of conversation between Madara and Hashirama at the time was about siblings dieing, so ultimately, it's safe to jump into the conclusion that Madara's four siblings had also died. Now, we don't know who all of his four siblings were, but we do know that Izuna was one of them.
However, how could all of Madara's four siblings have died such a long time ago, when clearly, Izuna was alive long after that:
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
NarutoWiki said:
Quote-Result: They were considered top of the Uchiha later on, not at the current point in the flashback of the manga (You can even tell by the pictures, Izuna's far older than Hashi, Tobi & Madara are in the present-flashback), so logically speaking, Izuna isn't dead in the current flashback, yet, Madara stated that all of his four siblings died as well.
And by this, I wan to ask the actual question:
1. Is this just a mistake by Kishi?
2. Could Madara & Hashirama be referring to their whole respective "Clan" as "Brothers" instead of their actual Siblings, Since that would make the statements more valid?
3. Explain
I'm assuming the 2nd option is the real one, I just want to hear what you guys think about it. I'd personally guess they're referring to their whole clan as brothers, but then again, surely more than 4 Uchihas (Madaras "brothers") had died up until this point as well, so it's rather strange, still, which makes me still believe that Madara was in fact referring to actual siblings, in which case it's wrong.
Last edited:
