[Discussion] "Complete disarmament" of the American people

[Q of the Sharingan]

Hmm... Why would you say "I'll be damned if they take my rifle." even though you seem to be strongly against what this guy is talking about...

1. Inforwars isn't a big corporation that can Hire people that have money to dress like big time News anchors...How he is dressed should not deter you from his message...Its not like he is dressed like a hobo...

2.He shows the documents on screen, w/e he might add isn't that much of a game changer, and he also excuses himself for adding things and making mistakes because he is shocked/afraid...

3.Did you see the video where the "Law Enforcement" bum rushed the old lady with the tiny lil unloaded revolver? Unwarranted in her own home? How is taking away civilians guns going to help civilians? It is understandable to stop thieves and robbers but How are the innocent going to protect themselves?

4.I don't think he necessarily wants that, i think he wants people to be aware and prepared... Which is true, the average person is not adequately equipped to deal with military personal...

5.Can't say much on this one, this is pretty much what dude is saying...Do you know what FEMA is?Look it up, FEMA literally gives the US Government the right to over-write every law and even the constitution...

I don't think the guy is insane i think he might be overly paranoid and scared...

He talks about the documents from 50 years ago because the recent ones involves those ones...

Again how is a good thing to disarm innocent civilians when theft and robbery is rampant?

IMO, the UN and the US's relationship is extremely fishy, through the UN the US is basically able to step foot on anyone's soil...also through the UN the US is capable of wielding an even greater army combined with soldiers from all over the world...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just some thoughts about your thoughts, Thank you for your opinion...

The fact that he is overly paranoid and scared takes away from the legitimacy of what he is saying

Taking away all people's weapons is what they did because they didn't know who was committing the robberies and it could have been anyone. It wasn't the best thing to do but it was the solution they came up with.

Your statement on the UN is the exact opposite of what the guy says. He thinks that the UN is going to invade the US not the other way arounf. Being part of the UN doesn't give countries the right to step on anyone's soil, it still has to get permission from the other country. Especially if it is military. The goal for the UN is overall peace, the US does probably take advantage of this, other countries try to do so to. It makes it easier to profit from trade and get assistance in times of war. Sometimes the US and other countries might exploit this.

And I said the rifle thing because it is highly improbable for them to take it. Me being damned is going to hell. I don't plan on that happening.

 

[ShishaMastah420]

The fact that he is overly paranoid and scared takes away from the legitimacy of what he is saying

Taking away all people's weapons is what they did because they didn't know who was committing the robberies and it could have been anyone. It wasn't the best thing to do but it was the solution they came up with.

Your statement on the UN is the exact opposite of what the guy says. He thinks that the UN is going to invade the US not the other way arounf. Being part of the UN doesn't give countries the right to step on anyone's soil, it still has to get permission from the other country. Especially if it is military. The goal for the UN is overall peace, the US does probably take advantage of this, other countries try to do so to. It makes it easier to profit from trade and get assistance in times of war. Sometimes the US and other countries might exploit this.

And I said the rifle thing because it is highly improbable for them to take it. Me being damned is going to hell. I don't plan on that happening.

Not necessarily...o.o specially when he is showing the documents on screen, you can pause the video and read them for yourself, he also provides links to these papers...

Disarming the defenseless was the best solution? seriously?

I don't believe my statement was the exact opposite, he is saying the UN wants Obama(The U.S president) to approve the bill/law so American civilians can be completely disarmed for "Peace"

Yes, on the books the UN is for Peace, but we've seen fishy stuff, like the US violating UN laws but the UN not doing anything against the US?

 

[Grim]

In a society that has destroyed all adventure, the only adventure left is to destroy society

You must be registered for see images

 

[ShishaMastah420]

In a society that has destroyed all adventure, the only adventure left is to destroy society

You must be registered for see images

Anarchy and Chaos sound a lil fun to me...@_@ I gets to shoot thingssss

 

[Q of the Sharingan]

Not necessarily...o.o specially when he is showing the documents on screen, you can pause the video and read them for yourself, he also provides links to these papers...

Disarming the defenseless was the best solution? seriously?

I don't believe my statement was the exact opposite, he is saying the UN wants Obama(The U.S president) to approve the bill/law so American civilians can be completely disarmed for "Peace"

Yes, on the books the UN is for Peace, but we've seen fishy stuff, like the US violating UN laws but the UN not doing anything against the US?

The documents are from decades ago. Nothing in them are in effect. He sees the signs he wants to see.

It wasn't just disarming the defenseless. It was disarming everyone so no one could cause harm. The principle was good but it was naive.

Your statement was the opposite of what the guy was saying. He said that the UN is a threat to the US. You said that the US is a threat through the UN.

 

[ShishaMastah420]

The documents are from decades ago. Nothing in them are in effect. He sees the signs he wants to see.

It wasn't just disarming the defenseless. It was disarming everyone so no one could cause harm. The principle was good but it was naive.

Your statement was the opposite of what the guy was saying. He said that the UN is a threat to the US. You said that the US is a threat through the UN.

No dude, the documents he is talking about, contains information about the documents from 50 years ago because those documents are being use collaboratively with more recent documents...

If you click on the video and watch it on YouTube they provide you with more information...

What do you see when the video shows where the document says; "A World where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control"

o.o I wasn't saying the US is necessarily a threat through the UN, i'm just saying the relationship between the two is fishy...also i was saying the UN wants Obama(The US President) to sign off on their plans of Complete disarmament...

Which is pretty much what the guy is saying...

 

[Grim]

Anarchy and Chaos sound a lil fun to me...@_@ I gets to shoot thingssss

But whole thing kinda makes sense.... there will be population reduction not because it's a conspiracy, because it's obvious - the earth is overpopulated and it gets even worse And I doubt we will get some fun..they will smash on us some new Plagues and work is done ^^ while all the elite is hidden in the bunkers!? I'm not conspiracy fanatic but I like to know what people think about topics like that, you never know is it true or not... you definitely wont see it on the news... it's a fact that news are controlled by gov and you will see on tv only what they want you to see ...russian - georgia incident said enough:sy: