Can you really be a "genius?"

Kagerou

Active member
Elite
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
8,554
Kin
10💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I know we've all seen the top student in our class getting A+'s, 100%'s in all their Test's, Exams and Quizzes..But the real thing is, can a person really be an absolute genius? In non-fiction it may have more of an increased chance, but what about the real world itself?

It's a weird question to ask, but It's been floating in my head for awhile .-.
 

giocuesta12

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
89
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Re: Can you really be an "absolute genius?"

Einstein for example, its really all I could think of on top of my head haha. There's tons of more we just have to look into it.
 

Hexuze

Active member
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
An absolute genius is literally impossible. That would be mean he/she would have to be a considered a "genius" in every aspect from book smart to even in the sense of anime. But if you're talking about school (just book smart), yeah it's possible but highly unlikely.
 

itachi4real

Active member
Elite
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
7,948
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Also look up edward scalene. Hes a f***in genius. Hes dead but he knew how our ancestors built the pyramids. Crazy how people today with this great technology cant seem ti figure out the secret behind the pyramids. He has his own museum in florida that he made out of big ass limestones( 2 tons and over each).
 

Mitarashi

Active member
Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
4,878
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
People are shaped, and made by what they have experienced, and what they perceive.

We all see the same things, some just see them more clearly.
 

Snape Uchiha

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
4,175
Kin
10💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
In the theory of multiple intelligences thereare 9 different types of intelligence (look up for more detail). One can be a genius in one or perhaps a few of these intelligences but no one can really master them all.
 

SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
39,759
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Re: Can you really be an "absolute genius?"

Einstein for example, its really all I could think of on top of my head haha. There's tons of more we just have to look into it.
Einstein didn't even believe in the Uncertainty Principle of QM and thought the Universe was static until LeMaitre made the Big Bang Theory, not to mention that he was dependent on the works of his predecessors like Newton, Riemann Geometry and Minkowski Space to formulate his Theory of Relativity.

There is no such thing as "absolute genius" Faraday was a genius in experimentation but was practically clueless in Mathematics, Sheldon Cooper is a genius in Physics but is completely clueless in driving (and sarcasm) Lol
 
Last edited:

Aim64C

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I know we've all seen the top student in our class getting A+'s, 100%'s in all their Test's, Exams and Quizzes..But the real thing is, can a person really be an absolute genius? In non-fiction it may have more of an increased chance, but what about the real world itself?

It's a weird question to ask, but It's been floating in my head for awhile .-.
It really depends upon what you classify as "Genius."

The key perspective of most highly intelligent people is a lack of fear of the unknown. 'Geniuses' tend to love the unknown and tend to approach learning from a cause-effect standpoint. You will basically never hear a 'genius' say that he or she is incapable of learning something. They will (or, should) acknowledge when they are not versed in a subject - but it's not an admission of defeat, but of limited human capacity.

A number of the 'absolute geniuses' are somewhat intimidating or awe-inspiring. You can discuss the primitives of a subject of study and you can literally watch them 'build' the more advanced theories and understandings of that subject while you are talking to them. Then they will write a blog post that makes a doctorate level thesis look quaint.

I'm yet undecided if such people are 'born' or if they are cultured into who or what they are. The closest I have come to answering that is: Genetics determines how you develop while your environment provides the reference for your development to be built by your experiences and tempered by your resolve.
 

vasu 32

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,765
Kin
11💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
lol,from when the grades started determining the level of genius?

it's a subjective term.

1. ARYABHATT(The inventor from India,who gave 0 to the world,invented sin,cos,tan and what not,in 300 B.C.)

2. LEONARDO DA' VINCI

3. GALILIO

4. EINSTEIN

5. BILL GATES(in a way)

etc.
 

EnDash

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
1,862
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
i think being a genius is a wrong thing to aspire to be. none of the "geniuses" you read about did what they did because they wanted people to think they are smart or special. scientists are curious, not smart. the people i would call smart are probably the rich people, and grades are really not why i think they are smart.
 
Top