Can you prove atheism wrong?

[Chikombo]

I have been trying to prove atheism wrong now for some times but I can't do it, my only defense are emotional reasons but nobody cares about emotions unless its a battle against robots.

If someone tells you religion is a lie.

And that religious tradtitions can't co exist with modern values.

What do you say in response?

Can you defend women wearing hijabs to people who wants to empower women?


Can you explain how gay people can still be good christians?

Can you prove God exsits?


Can you defend the stories of religious texts?


Or is your defense simply that it doesn't matter you only have a different point of view and that's it.

 

[JoanaTak]

Can you prove anything right or wrong though ? How do you know that we aren't in a simulation and somebody else is controlling our thoughts ? Can you explain how gay people can't be good Christians ? The Bible has a lot of errors in it that not a lot of people want to follow and continue questioning because it's outdated.

 

[minamoto]

Can you prove anything right or wrong though ? How do you know that we aren't in a simulation and somebody else is controlling our thoughts ? Can you explain how gay people can't be good Christians ? The Bible has a lot of errors in it that not a lot of people want to follow and continue questioning because it's outdated.

tele tubbiez is playing..go watch it go!!!..

 

[Marin]

I have been trying to prove atheism wrong now for some times but I can't do it, my only defense are emotional reasons but nobody cares about emotions unless its a battle against robots.

If someone tells you religion is a lie.

And that religious tradtitions can't co exist with modern values.

What do you say in response?

While you can't prove anything with certainty, one could make a plausible case for some sort of first cause or necessary existence which people would call God in some broad sense. Look up the Fine-Tuning argument by Luke Barnes or the Contingency argument by Alexander Pruss.

Can you defend women wearing hijabs to people who wants to empower women?

I would say wearing it needs no defense if it is consensual. Forcing women to wear it is just plain immoral.

Can you explain how gay people can still be good christians?

They can't unless they abstain from *** and romantic relationships in general.

Can you prove God exsits?

Refer to the two arguments I mentioned above.

Can you defend the stories of religious texts?

Depends on the text. Some don't need much defending while some have been historically debunked to the point where the only thing you can do is rationalize in an effort to convince yourself to keep believing but generally there is little one can do to convince anyone who doesn't already wish to believe.

Or is your defense simply that it doesn't matter you only have a different point of view and that's it.

In some cases where there is simply no mutual ground for a meaningful conversation (like if someone is super skeptical and will not accept any religious claim as credible regardless of what evidence is presented due to some impossibly high criteria or if a religious person has decided that God is outside of scope of human reason and nothing we say about him amounts to much) agreeing to disagree is the only smart thing to do. It is however often used as a conversation stopper when one simply doesn't feel like explaining themselves any further in which case it is a bit cheesy.

 

[minamoto]

While you can't prove anything with certainty, one could make a plausible case for some sort of first cause or necessary existence which people would call God in some broad sense. Look up the Fine-Tuning argument by Luke Barnes or the Contingency argument by Alexander Pruss.



I would say wearing it needs no defense if it is consensual. Forcing women to wear it is just plain immoral.



They can't unless they abstain from *** and romantic relationships in general.



Refer to the two arguments I mentioned above.



Depends on the text. Some don't need much defending while some have been historically debunked to the point where the only thing you can do is rationalize in an effort to convince yourself to keep believing but generally there is little one can do to convince anyone who doesn't already wish to believe.



In some cases where there is simply no mutual ground for a meaningful conversation (like if someone is super skeptical and will not accept any religious claim as credible regardless of what evidence is presented due to some impossibly high criteria or if a religious person has decided that God is outside of scope of human reason and nothing we say about him amounts to much) agreeing to disagree is the only smart thing to do. It is however often used as a conversation stopper when one simply doesn't feel like explaining themselves any further in which case it is a bit cheesy.

r u talkin to me????..

 

[JoanaTak]

tele tubbiez is playing..go watch it go!!!..

I heard there's an empty grave reserved for old lizards like you, you should go see it !!!

 

[minamoto]

I heard there's an empty grave reserved for old lizards like you, you should go see it !!!

KAWAI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...

 

[JoanaTak]

KAWAI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...

IKR I heard Julius Caesar built it for you when you were born !!!! It's a little old though

 

[minamoto]

IKR I heard Julius Caesar built it for you when you were born !!!! It's a little old though

kawaiiiiiiiiiiiiii ...