Lesnar was always a brute in WWE. Just that only few have seen him in the early 2000's.
Yo did you ever hear that shoot interview about Angle talking about a legit match he had with Lesnar
[video=youtube;mqcVAsKCT3I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqcVAsKCT3I[/video]
Lesnar was like, in his early twenties? Christ
Lesnar was always a brute in WWE. Just that only few have seen him in the early 2000's.
It's getting old. Don't get me wrong, Brock Lesnar is one of their most exciting performers to watch in the ring, and I wish more matches could be as destructive as his. He's a treat.
But now I'm seeing articles that are calling Ambrose a jobber, and they have a point.Feeding dudes to Lesnar is becoming as brutal as getting fed to John Cena used to be, career and storyline-wise. And you're not going to be having long-running feuds with Lesnar unless you're gonna beat him, or you're John Cena.
They need to find someone to beat him, and I know they want it to be Reigns, but they can't get Reigns over. So we're gonna be seeing this until they can. That's Creative's plan.
Which doesn't bode well.
Cena doesn´t have raw strength as Brock that was clear at extereme rules (I have that on my DVD)
Only one who could rival him was Goldberg (he defeeated him actually) he was also extremely strong but not that agresive.
Now that I do remember. Lesnar may be a beast but Goldberg is crazier. That was Wrestlemania 20 if I remember correctly.
Kane has more brute strength than Lesnar![]()
yeah I think brock said beating Kane in arm wrestling is immposible
Brock said he challenged everyone in WWE in strength competitions and the only one who couldn't beat was Kane. But those were other times, the Kane of now is just a shadow of the Big Red Machine of the Attitude Era