Both Sasuke and Orochimary had "Izanami/Izanagi"

Haku Yuki

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2012
Messages
412
Reaction score
34
Hopefully I am not repeating what has been mentioned.
I hear all this crap about Izanami this and Izanagi that. But more importantly I hear "Uchiha" and "Izanami/Izanagi" in the same sentence. But I was rewatching some of the anime. And there was a jutsu...that was better than Izanami and Izanagi and came with no cost like loss of sharingan. AND NO ONE SAID ANYTHING!

Okay you ready...
OROCHIMARU SUBSTITUTION JUTSU!!!!!!!!!!!!:overjoy:
WTF did people forget about this or something:confused::confused:

Orochimary style substitution jutsu was able to survive MULTIPLE attacks from Naruto when he had 4 tails out. Sasuke was able to survive Amaterasu.

This technique is better. It's only downside is chakara drainage....
But it is BETTER than izanami and izanagi!

So am I missing something here? Orochimaru style substitution makes the great uchiha jutsu look like crap.
 

Owarij

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
13,322
Reaction score
990
Someone with Izanagi can survive kirin/rasenshruiken

Orochimaru can't survive kirin or rasenshruiken

see the difference? k
 

Haku Yuki

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2012
Messages
412
Reaction score
34
Someone with Izanagi can survive kirin/rasenshruiken

Orochimaru can't survive kirin or rasenshruiken

see the difference? k

If it can survive the 4 tails from naruto AND amaterasu its just as good as izanami/izagani.

Especially surviving Amaterasu
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
381
Reaction score
36
A: How can you say it's better than Izanami when you have no idea what it does?

B: Debatable about it being better than Izanagi. Izanagi could survive any jutsu. Oro's tech would not survive all jutsu. Konan's paper bomb thing she used on Tobi, chibaku tensi. Techs that cover a very wide area. Because when you use the sub tech you are still in range for all those attack.

Personally I think Izanami is better. But pro and con wise oro tech comes with less loss. Just chakra not an eye. But if the attack has a wide enough range oros tech wouldn't help and Izanami would.
 

Rapid

Banned
Regular
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
591
Reaction score
14
We dont know izanami does
 

Haku Yuki

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2012
Messages
412
Reaction score
34
A: How can you say it's better than Izanami when you have no idea what it does?

B: Debatable about it being better than Izanagi. Izanagi could survive any jutsu. Oro's tech would not survive all jutsu. Konan's paper bomb thing she used on Tobi, chibaku tensi. Techs that cover a very wide area. Because when you use the sub tech you are still in range for all those attack.

Personally I think Izanami is better. But pro and con wise oro tech comes with less loss. Just chakra not an eye. But if the attack has a wide enough range oros tech wouldn't help and Izanami would.

You make a good point, since after using oro's substitution jutsu, you would still be "revived" in the same location.

But still it is GOOD! Does not get enough credit...
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
381
Reaction score
36
You make a good point, since after using oro's substitution jutsu, you would still be "revived" in the same location.

But still it is GOOD! Does not get enough credit...

No it is a very handy and very good jutsu. But it can be beat. Izanzami is better. Nothing can get through it to my knowledge.
 
Top