[Discussion] Boa Hancock vs Zoro

[ZoroXTashigi]

Ohh right my bad for missing your point before U_U. Now. this is just my speculation. but if Zoro can use busoshoku haki to harm a devil fruit user(as he did with Monet on PH) he can use it to defend himself aswell e.g like how luffy can do busoshoku kouka to defend against devil fruit attacks or even bypass them. Zoro could do the same but with his swords for defence and offence aswell. Also Oda also stated something along the lines of Zoro specialises in CoA, Luffy in CoC and Sanji in CoO so Zoro should be able to use his haki to defend himself against Hancocks kicks or bypass them if necessary.

This statement means...
Luffy's CoC > Luffy's CoA & Luffy's CoO
Zoro's CoA > Zoro's CoO
Sanji's CoO > Sanji's CoA

So this statement cannot used as base to said Zoro's CoA close or better than other people's CoA.

 

[Hexuze]

The Hakified attack against Monet wasn't really that impressive, but at the same time uncommon considering the attack was used at a distance. He basically projected haki in the air creating a hakified slicing air attack, something we had not seen someone capable to produce yet considering most hakified attacks are close range. Now how difficult it is to do it remains unknown

Seeing how the Kuja tribe are able to do it with their arrows, I don't see it being impressive. It's a similar concept.

 

[Beyonce]

This section...sigh. Hancock can't beat MF Smoker now HAHAHA. I still say Zoro wins though high-dif, I don't find Hancock as impressive as others do.

lol MF smoker is irrelevant. Plot is what ultimately saved him. This is the Smoker who couldn't even defeat Vergo. And Hancock defeats Vergo mid diff.

@Zoro
Mihawk's haki isn't as good as Hancock's too because-
-He has no hype for it
-He has no feats for it
-He hasn't had it as a child like Hancock

We can only assume he has haki, but even then he hasn't shown a single feat of it nevertheless hype for it.

Zoro's still getting low-diff'ed