[Discussion] BLM

[slimreaper]

Still justifying yourself? Man you are deluded as f**k.

still can't fight any facts I bring? And I'm deluded

Lets back this up... Don't act like I don't see what you're doing


"Uh under the Clinton administration, there were more incarcerations than anywhere in the world and the majority of them were blacks for the possession of marijuana, even though it was statistically proven that the rates of marijuana possession were equal with white people.

But during that time, the government kept saying how it believed in equal rights. So there's your justification"

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

go ahead defend your ridiculous assertion

 

[Rohan]

Why do I feel that some people here are stuck in an endless Izanami ?

 

[Lightbringer]

still can't fight any facts I bring? And I'm deluded

I've been arguing with you for over a two months. Facts are not something that you accept.

Tell me, if you are so right about everything, then why does virtually no one ever agree with you?

I mean if you're right, then you're right. So why is it that everyone keeps saying you're wrong?

 

[slimreaper]

I've been arguing with you for over a two months. Facts are not something that you accept.

Tell me, if you are so right about everything, then why does virtually no one ever agree with you?

I mean if you're right, then you're right. So why is it that everyone keeps saying you're wrong?

Who right now is saying I'm wrong but you?


you asserted

"Uh under the Clinton administration, there were more incarcerations than anywhere in the world and the majority of them were blacks for the possession of marijuana, even though it was statistically proven that the rates of marijuana possession were equal with white people.

But during that time, the government kept saying how it believed in equal rights. So there's your justification"

I then provided facts to counter this claim.


You then tried to discredit this, and when you couldn't you attack my reputation. Reputation aside you're losing hard right now.

You have no support, so you desperately try to change the subject

 

[Lightbringer]

Who right now is saying I'm wrong but you?


you asserted

"Uh under the Clinton administration, there were more incarcerations than anywhere in the world and the majority of them were blacks for the possession of marijuana, even though it was statistically proven that the rates of marijuana possession were equal with white people.

But during that time, the government kept saying how it believed in equal rights. So there's your justification"

I then provided facts to counter this claim.


You then tried to discredit this, and when you couldn't you attack my reputation. Reputation aside you're losing hard right now.

You have no support, so you desperately try to change the subject

Lmao, I countered your invalid source or have you already forgotten? I'm not gonna keep wasting my time reading nonsense that you happen to come across online.

So all of those people who are currently countering your points and disagreeing with you on the active threads don't count? All of those people that dislike your threads don't count?

lol you are a joke.

 

[slimreaper]

Lmao, I countered your invalid source or have you already forgotten? I'm not gonna keep wasting my time reading nonsense that you happen to come across online.

So all of those people who are currently countering your points and disagreeing with you on the active threads don't count? All of those people that dislike your threads don't count?

lol you are a joke.

NO you didn't

You must be registered for see links

"A sample of 95 intravenous drug users agreed to provide urine samples, which would be tested for the presence of the metabolites of opiates and cocaine; the purpose of the study was to assess the validity of injection drug users' self- reported use of these drugs.
Using chi-square analyses, the researchers determined that there were no significant differences between intravenous drug users who agreed to participate in the study and those who declined to participate in terms of age, gender, ethnic group, education, primary drug of choice, treatment history, project intervention assignment, or time of follow-up. The urinalysis findings showed that 30 percent of the 67 participants who claimed to be drug-free over the previous 6 months had in fact used drugs. When compared to the total sample, the rate of misrepresentation fell to 21 percent. Logit regression analyses indicated that intravenous drug users who were black or whose primary drugs of choice were injected cocaine and crack were more likely than other groups to misrepresent their current drug use status. These findings demonstrate the need to corroborate self-report data with other, quantitative measures.

you didn't counter this. You "countered" the site that cited this information. you never actually countered the information."


You're a fraud

 

[Lightbringer]

NO you didn't

You must be registered for see links

"A sample of 95 intravenous drug users agreed to provide urine samples, which would be tested for the presence of the metabolites of opiates and cocaine; the purpose of the study was to assess the validity of injection drug users' self- reported use of these drugs.
Using chi-square analyses, the researchers determined that there were no significant differences between intravenous drug users who agreed to participate in the study and those who declined to participate in terms of age, gender, ethnic group, education, primary drug of choice, treatment history, project intervention assignment, or time of follow-up. The urinalysis findings showed that 30 percent of the 67 participants who claimed to be drug-free over the previous 6 months had in fact used drugs. When compared to the total sample, the rate of misrepresentation fell to 21 percent. Logit regression analyses indicated that intravenous drug users who were black or whose primary drugs of choice were injected cocaine and crack were more likely than other groups to misrepresent their current drug use status. These findings demonstrate the need to corroborate self-report data with other, quantitative measures.

you didn't counter this. You "countered" the site that cited this information. you never actually countered the information."


You're a fraud

lol I countered your plagiarized statement.

Like I said, you have no credibility, so why should I waste my time reading your sources?

Hell, you can't even read one paragraph and you want me to read pages and pages of your nonsense? No thanks.


Again I ask; if you are always right about what you post, then why is that no one agrees with you?

 

[slimreaper]

lol I countered your plagiarized statement.

Like I said, you have no credibility, so why should I waste my time reading your sources?

Hell, you can't even read one paragraph and you want me to read pages and pages of your nonsense? No thanks.


Again I ask; if you are always right about what you post, then why is that no one agrees with you?

I'm right. Bring anyone and they'll agree that here I'm right.

you didn't counter shit.

"A recent study of arrest data show that African Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession offences than Whites, even though general prevalence estimates show that they are no more likely to be using. The current study investigates the purchase patterns of marijuana users from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) to evaluate whether differences in purchasing behaviors exist across racial groups. Although in general people who purchase marijuana are more likely to buy in private settings and from someone they know, this analysis shows that African Americans are statistically more likely to engage in risky purchasing behaviors that increase their likelihood of arrest. Using trivariate probit regression with demographic, drug use, and drug market covariates, analyses reveal that African Americans are nearly twice as likely to buy outdoors (0.31 versus 0.14), three times more likely to buy from a stranger (0.30 versus 0.09), and significantly more likely to buy away from their homes (0.61 versus 0.48). These results provide an additional explanation for the differential in arrest rates between African Americans and Whites."


I own you ******

 

[Lightbringer]

I'm right. Bring anyone and they'll agree that here I'm right.

you didn't counter shit.

"A recent study of arrest data show that African Americans are 2.5 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession offences than Whites, even though general prevalence estimates show that they are no more likely to be using. The current study investigates the purchase patterns of marijuana users from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) to evaluate whether differences in purchasing behaviors exist across racial groups. Although in general people who purchase marijuana are more likely to buy in private settings and from someone they know, this analysis shows that African Americans are statistically more likely to engage in risky purchasing behaviors that increase their likelihood of arrest. Using trivariate probit regression with demographic, drug use, and drug market covariates, analyses reveal that African Americans are nearly twice as likely to buy outdoors (0.31 versus 0.14), three times more likely to buy from a stranger (0.30 versus 0.09), and significantly more likely to buy away from their homes (0.61 versus 0.48). These results provide an additional explanation for the differential in arrest rates between African Americans and Whites."


I own you ******

I'll pat you on the head if it makes you feel better.

 

[slimreaper]

I'll pat you on the head if it makes you feel better.

of course. Even when you're wrong you need to feel superior.

Whats great is you got owned by the guy everyone hates. Let that soak in

 

[Lightbringer]

of course. Even when you're wrong you need to feel superior.

Whats great is you got owned by the guy everyone hates. Let that soak in

Whatever makes you feel better.

Spoiler

I hope you realize I'm being sarcastic by the way. Your evidence is not validated by any other credible source.

 

[slimreaper]

Whatever makes you feel better.

Spoiler

I hope you realize I'm being sarcastic by the way. Your evidence is not validated by any other credible source.

It's never enough for you. You lose. I win deal with it.


You have no facts so you question mine. typical

 

[Lightbringer]

It's never enough for you. You lose. I win deal with it.


You have no facts so you question mine. typical

Like I said, whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

I've lost enough brain cells arguing with you. I'm done for today.

 

[slimreaper]

Like I said, whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

I've lost

you're right

 

[Lightbringer]

you're right

Ha, man you're upset.

 

[slimreaper]

Ha, man you're upset.

Why's that? I'm not the one so clearly owned