Hm interesting point of view. I'll say this again.
If I had them right now I'd beat you with the "Elder Scrolls" Game of the Year awards, if only you could defend yourself with the ZERO Game of the Year awards that Battlefield has ever won.
You obviously have no idea what video games were truly made for in the first place, did you think back in the late 80's and 90's that games were meant to be played online with 15 year old drop outs who spend there whole day playing MW/BF dreaming that one one there lack of knowledge and intelligence would hopefully make them hardcore gamers so everyone knows there username and they could win World Tournaments? Well you'd be stupid if you thought that.
Video games were meant to be judged on a list of things;
- Story
- Theme
- Graphics
- Music
- Enjoyment
- Wow-Factor
Oh and Skyrim has all these things as well as previous "Elder Scroll" games which by the way won "Game of the Year" awards. They spend years making these games that excel in all categories and put other games to shame. If you were to call yourself a real gamer than you would KNOW even if you liked BF3 or MW3 better that Skyrim is superior is so many more ways.
But lets go back to what you actually wrote, I personally prefer MW3 over BF3 because I just didn't enjoy it as much and honestly it most aspects it's the same thing. But you said if you like MW3 your IQ drops? Well just so everyone knows the guy who said that also decided to use the word "funner" and not the proper "more fun" thus proving my point that you were born between the years of 1997 and now meaning you don't know a good history of real gaming.