- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,252
- Reaction score
- 65
Everybody loves to say that since the databook has been proven wrong on several occasions, mostly with the stats, that it should 'not be taken seriously'.
I think, personally, this is ridiculous.
Just because Kishi changed some things over the course of the series DOES NOT mean that his word doesn't count over yours.
My opinion is everything in the databook stands until proven false. People love to talk about 'source' material; you don't get closer to the source than what the author actually says.
Wouldn't that make more sense than believing, 'Oh, just because Kakuzu had 4 in speed and Kakashi had 4.5, and Kakuzu blitzed him means we should forgo the entire databook'?
Do you agree or not?
I think, personally, this is ridiculous.
Just because Kishi changed some things over the course of the series DOES NOT mean that his word doesn't count over yours.
My opinion is everything in the databook stands until proven false. People love to talk about 'source' material; you don't get closer to the source than what the author actually says.
Wouldn't that make more sense than believing, 'Oh, just because Kakuzu had 4 in speed and Kakashi had 4.5, and Kakuzu blitzed him means we should forgo the entire databook'?
Do you agree or not?