So I just read this.
Almost 4,000,000 children in the UK are too poor to have a healthy diet
How about you guys?
Almost 4,000,000 children in the UK are too poor to have a healthy diet
How about you guys?
I guess like a balanced meal. <2000 daily intake. No sweets and junk.You need to provide a definition of eating healthy.
Ok thanks for the clarity, I think the US standard would be a poor measure to judge the UK or the world by.I guess like a balanced meal. <2000 daily intake. No sweets and junk.
A salad = $6
McDonald’s burger =$1.17
Bottled water = $3
Faucet water = free
Whole Foods weekly bill = $100
Walmart monthly bill = $100
Well eating healthy is more expensive when compared to unhealthy food.
This is uninformed, and as a result, you could possibly be suffering from health issues. Eating healthy is easy, and cheaper.I guess like a balanced meal. <2000 daily intake. No sweets and junk.
A salad = $6
McDonald’s burger =$1.17
Bottled water = $3
Faucet water = free
Whole Foods weekly bill = $100
Walmart monthly bill = $100
Adding dressing to your salad to reach the daily intake isn't healthy either. Btw
3 dollars for a pack at Walmart. Idk if it's the Walmart brand, but I'm pretty sure it's offbrand. I'm posting right now at the pharmacy I work at, and the offbrand water (24pack) here is $2.49USDI wasn’t clear. 3 dollars for Walmart brand 24 pack of water.
Or for the fancy water, 3 dollars for a liter
Thanks for the offer but healthy depends on who's defining it. I guess you could help OP I think he needs it.
I can seriously help you guys eat healthy, if you so choose to. It's really not hard.
Are you saying people can define health as anything, or are you saying there is no objective measure of health? Cause anyone can define anything as anything. Someone could define health as the amount you weigh, without factoring disease, or injury. Doesnt mean they're right, would you agree?Thanks for the offer but healthy depends on who's defining it. I guess you could help OP I think he needs it.
I would agree but I would like to add some foods may be healthy for some and unhealthy for others, due to metabolic conditons, genetics, environmental factors and how the body reacts to them(food and environment). There's no general rule that can be applied to any group of people only some basic guidelines.Are you saying people can define health as anything, or are you saying there is no objective measure of health? Cause anyone can define anything as anything. Someone could define health as the amount you weigh, without factoring disease, or injury. Doesnt mean they're right, would you agree?
I see what you're saying. So, what's required for someone to maintain their health is dependent on the individual. I wouldn't say that changes the definition of what's healthy, or at least what's generally healthy. Genetics, allergies, metabolic complications, etc. are in the minority of dietary considerations that determine what's healthy, so I believe you can make a general rule despite the exceptions.I would agree but I would like to add some foods may be healthy for some and unhealthy for others, due to metabolic conditons, genetics, environmental factors and how the body reacts to them(food and environment). There's no general rule that can be applied to any group of people only some basic guidelines.
Boi, you also gotta drive to the supermarket lolbut the cost of driving up to McDonalds, to grab your death in burger form, meaning that you're paying for the constant cost of travel, which adds up.