Are you against gay marriage?

[Umari Senju]

Please, just spare me this sick propaganda...

It isn't propaganda, it's truth. I should know. I have 2 fathers.

 

[Bubbles The Powerpuff Girl]

Except human beings aren't ****ing magnets.

OT: I support it.

Do you know what a comparison is?

Obviously ****ing don't. Not to mention, sexual orientations work like magnets.

Because people will clearly all turn gay if we allow gay marriage. It's allowed here where I live, and I don't see people starting to turn gay from right to left.

Slow eradication.

Jewish used to rule the world, look at them now.

 

[Turson]

It isn't propaganda, it's truth. I should know. I have 2 fathers.

You = not everybody else.

 

[Namikun]

Because it always comes down to religion....and boobs.

Because religion is 'always right' and if you're not with them, you're against them.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Ultimate counterargument to anyone against homosexuality: Neil Patrick Harris.

GG homophobes.

 

[Klad]

This is getting pretty ridiculous .

 

[Namikun]

Do you know what a comparison is?

Obviously ****ing don't. Not to mention, sexual orientations work like magnets.



Slow eradication.

Jewish used to rule the world, look at them now.

Sexual orientations work like magnet? Well... if there are people who prefer the same ***, obviously not? :heh:

Ultimate counterargument to anyone against homosexuality: Neil Patrick Harris.

GG homophobes.

Well that was easy.

 

[Skylar Knight]

Do you know what a comparison is?

Obviously ****ing don't. Not to mention, sexual orientations work like magnets.



Slow eradication.

Jewish used to rule the world, look at them now.

There are people who're even attracted to objects, like trees and stones. There aren't only two sexual orientations out there, there's dozens of them. Magnets are nothing like ones sexuality.

Are you seriously comparing ones sexuality with a group of people? Seriously? And no, they didn't rule the world, not at all.

 

[Scorpio0Pharaoh0Titan]

Do you know what a comparison is?

Obviously ****ing don't. Not to mention, sexual orientations work like magnets.



Slow eradication.

Jewish used to rule the world, look at them now.

...Sexual orientation does NOT work like magnets. A real-world experiment has already been done to disprove your weightless statement.

North magnet is (A) (Man)
South magnet is (B) (Woman)

Your theory is that since A is attracted to B, then Man is attracted to woman.
Since there is no variation in the magnetic attractions, that means, if any magnet A is attracted to any magnet B, then magnet A will always be attracted to magnet B, which, in fact, is the case for MAGNETS. NOT HUMAN BEINGS.

In comparison, all men must be attracted to all women, which, isn't the case, as clearly, we have men who are attracted to men, and women who are attracted to women.

So, therefore, magnets don't work as a good example. Clearly, in reality, we have magnet (A) (man) attracted to another magnet (A) (man).

Sexual orientations work like magnet? Well... if there are people who prefer the same ***, obviously not? :heh:

beat me to it.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Do you know what a comparison is?

Obviously ****ing don't. Not to mention, sexual orientations work like magnets.



Slow eradication.

Jewish used to rule the world, look at them now.

Your comparison makes no sense is the problem. While magnets of the same poles can't attract, people of the same *** can. If you're trying to imply gay couples don't work out, you're wrong. There's lots of gay couples who are happy.

And no, approving gay marriage WON'T make birth rates zero. How does approving gay marriage mean the whole will become gay? What you're saying makes no type of sense.

 

[Bubbles The Powerpuff Girl]

Sexual orientations work like magnet? Well... if there are people who prefer the same ***, obviously not? :heh:

Exactly, why it breaks the rules of it.

Looking from far and wider, homosexuality is in every way you look wrong. Why else is calling someone gay in school forbidden? Because people don't want to be that. They can't adopt children. Why? Because the children have mass influence from their parents and become one too, turning it mass and slow eradication of heterosexual people.

 

[Wolfus]

Wrong. Wrong. Absolutely wrong.

The main flaw in this isn't that you can't calculate it mathematically... in fact, you can make ANYTHING that exists be represented in the form of a mathematical model.

The more important question to ask is: How ACCURATE is that model?

And, sir, the reason why I said "Wrong" is because your mathematical model may be precise, but not accurate.

Two different things. Yes, you may very well be able to calculate the % of children who become gay (if you believe it is a choice firstly) if they have homosexual parents as opposed to heterosexual parents and be precise with that data, however, is it accurate?

Is it close enough to the REAL WORLD SCENARIOS that actually happen? And the answer, to that... is NO.

There are way too many variables to be able to accurately (not precisely) make a statement that says:

"A child has a higher chance of being gay if they have homosexual parents than heterosexual parents"

The only way this would work is if you segregated each set of parents from one another, as well as from society and still somehow was able to allow the parents to raise their children in what is seen as "NORMAL" by society.

Which in and of itself is impossible.

The reason is children are bombarded with media, other social beings, animals, education, history, culture... you name it... any one of these can influence any one child into becoming gay using your logic. You would have to segregate that child from all of these and basically, the child could only speak to, eat with, go out with, see, hear, smell, touch and live with their parents ONLY.

Which would be impossible.

Looks like I have to repeat the same thing over and over again.

"Event/sample space

Event is what you want, whereas sample space is all the events related to that.

To see if some factor has a lot of impact or not in some behavior, we check that %. We can get all the % with many events related to that, and we'll have arround 100% when we put them all together(arround because of the lack of some information, or the lack of some numbers because of the research).

With this, you would see how much impact does "being raised by gay parents" account for. And with the same %, getting the way we calculate probability, we would use that % as well.

If the other factors are just as important, then we would get closer % of them, as they would have more impact, and therefore, more numbers.
Why do you think that the % of kids raised by straigth parents is lower? Because of how the parents act, and what they teach the kids. The numbers show how much impact these factors have.

Now think: why is it increasing? Because now, kids see it in the TV as well, because now, parents tell them it's ok. And now, some parents act that way as well.

It's called being logical. If that's a problem or not, it's up for society to decide, as I said."

Try reading the quote.

As I said, the probability is not a "for sure" thing. Just becaus the numebrs are higher, it doesn't mean it will happen everytime.
However, we can see the impact of the factors based on those numbers. The factors, you mentioned, the bold part, obviously has it's weight. However, that weight can be seen if you get the numbers.
Of course it wouldn't the 100% accurate, as the only way to achieve this, would be making the experiece you mentioned. The "segregation". But as you said, that it's impossible.

However, we call still account for some accurance with the above. And let's not foget about the psicollogic works as well. Many psicologists are sure that at younger ages, kids copy many things they see. As their closest exemple is their parents, they would repeat their actions a lot. And this would have an impact on the kid's behavior for all his life.
It will also depend on what the parents teach them, as some parents do some stuff (throwing trash in the street, for exemple) but still teach the kids that it is wrong.

And if you reallt think about it, both kids raised by straigth parents and by gay parents live in the same society. So the effetcs of the society are applied for both. As they are in the same enviroment(considering the whole world), if the parents weren't a haevy facotr, the % would be closer for both the kids, as the effects of society would be seen in both. However, they are very different, which is one more evidence of the weigth the parents have, and the higher accurance of that calculation.


All of this, plus the numbers, can't be ignored.

 

[Boston Rob]

Is this thread for people to start to support gays? Gays are mother nature mistakes. Please ne rep me gays.

 

[Ōkami]

Exactly, why it breaks the rules of it.

Looking from far and wider, homosexuality is in every way you look wrong. Why else is calling someone gay in school forbidden? Because people don't want to be that. They can't adopt children. Why? Because the children have mass influence from their parents and become one too, turning it mass and slow eradication of heterosexual people.

You do realize that even if all of humanity went gay we could still continue as a species.

Artificial insemination.

 

[Bubbles The Powerpuff Girl]

There are people who're even attracted to objects, like trees and stones. There aren't only two sexual orientations out there, there's dozens of them. Magnets are nothing like ones sexuality.

Are you seriously comparing ones sexuality with a group of people? Seriously? And no, they didn't rule the world, not at all.

Are you serious?

Before any of these religions like Christianity and Islam, there was one mass religion living until now. And that was Judaism. Taking over half of the world in terms of religion.

Are you really serious?

 

[Skylar Knight]

Exactly, why it breaks the rules of it.

Looking from far and wider, homosexuality is in every way you look wrong. Why else is calling someone gay in school forbidden? Because people don't want to be that. They can't adopt children. Why? Because the children have mass influence from their parents and become one too, turning it mass and slow eradication of heterosexual people.

Because it's used as a negative word by teenagers all over the world. It's because they've been taught by their parents, and they by their parents, and so on, that homosexuality is a wrong. They have been taught.

 

[Umari Senju]

You = not everybody else.

It's not just me. I know plenty of others. It all boils down to the parents. And they don't have even be gay. People raise their children differently mostly on how they were raised by their parents, enviroment, social media, etc. Homosexuality is a biological development and not taught.

It's not a choice! You need to understand that first. And there in lies the problem. Those who are not gay think it's a lifestyle or choice. It bloody well isn't.

This whole "gay people threaten the human population" BS is just that. BS. There are more heterosexuals then Homosexuals. Not everyone was put on this earth to breed. If everyone was straight and had children the world would get extremely overcroweded. We'd run out of resources and our food supplies would dwindle not to mention a number of other things.

Did you ever think that homosexuality might be nature's way of population control? No of course not. feed into the hate the misconceptions the preconceived notions spoon fed to you by anti-gay groups and affilitates because they know gay people better than they know themselves, huh? :vincent:

 

[Namikun]

Is this thread for people to start to support gays? Gays are mother nature mistakes. Please ne rep me gays.

What? Nobody wants to have a disscusion with you? Go back to your Troll school.

 

[Europa]

Nope. If Gays want to be happy together then be my guest. I doubt God will really mind that much.

 

[theacknowledgedone]

I'm not against gay marriage. However, it is an Apocalypse for human kind in which we control. As the % climbs or falls, views can change depending on the person.