Are you against gay marriage?

[lesley]

yeah....i think attraction same *** attraction should be treated like autism....you know there's a problem, so deal with it instead of accepting it.

 

[Turson]

And so what? I mean.. overpopulation is a problem right now so.... I don't see why it would be a bad thing..

Actually, the number of people in western countries is decreasing. On the contrary, the number of imigrants (mainly from middle east) in those countries is getting higher and higher.

 

[Wolfus]

Number tells us one thing and that is what we are able to calculate, which leaves the incalculable unanswered, me entiendes?

We are able to calculate the % of kids raised by gay parents turning gay based on the total % of kids that turned gay rasied by gay parents considering the toal of kids raised by gay parents.

Of course there are other reasons for people turning gay or gathering any other idea. But the parents behavior is a very important factor, as what the parents teach the kids is a factor as well.

I don't know what's with these hippies ignoring % "oh numbers tell nothing, this is not math, lol".

 

[thunderthehybrid]

i'm not against anything.

 

[Madara mhm]

Im homophobic, But you can't just take away somebodys rights because their gay, it's just damn right harsh, yeh I don't like gays, and im against the idea of gay marriage, but Still, it's their life, so they get rights, because their apart of humanity. Although I think gays can get married without actually being married?? Civil relationship or somet, atleast that's what I've heard.

OT - I Don't think they should allow it, but it's a persons right to choose their sexual orientation, and how the want to go about life, the law shouldn't control their life for them.

 

[Wolfus]

And so what? I mean.. overpopulation is a problem right now so.... I don't see why it would be a bad thing..

I explained it already in another post as well. But here it is again.

" I think increasing the % of homossexualism is good at a point, and then it becomes bad. Now the arguments: With more gay people, you can conclude that the rate of fertilization would decrease. Not all of them have the money to do artificial insemination, nor would some want to do it.

So, the problem of overcrowding could be reduced, and with it, the % of poberty and hunger could decrease as well. However, at some point, the population would get even older, we would have less children, less workers,a nd that would start to cause some damage to society.

Conclusion: As there are other ways of decreasing the rate of fertilization, and these ways are way easier to be controlled, it's likely that increasing the % of homossexualism wouldn't be very positive."

 

[Namikun]

Actually, the number of people in western countries is decreasing. On the contrary, the number of imigrants in those countries is getting higher and higher.

That's another problem I won't talk about on this thread . :O

 

[Wolfus]

Im homophobic, But you can't just take away somebodys rights because their gay, it's just damn right harsh, yeh I don't like gays, and im against the idea of gay marriage, but Still, it's their life, so they get rights, because their apart of humanity. Although I think gays can get married without actually being married?? Civil relationship or somet, atleast that's what I've heard.

OT - I Don't think they should allow it, but it's a persons right to choose their sexual orientation, and how the want to go about life, the law shouldn't control their life for them.

If you think that, you're not homophobic.
Homophobia is to hate, to discriminate, to have the desire to segregate or harm(in any way) an homossexual for the very reason that the person is homossexual.

 

[ShishaMastah420]

Yes it does. The post right above explains it. You say as if I wrote that "all kids raised by gay would turn gay". That's never what I said. But you can't ignore the obvious explanation I gave for the fact, nor can you counter the current %.
Google a bit, maybe you can find some numbers.

Maybe you shouldn't Google as much, it is really poisonous to the mind that isn't ready.

Like I said and will remain to say, you can't calculate something that has seemingly random variables, such as whether or not a child raised by gay parents will become gay, since according to the gays, it's not a choice.

 

[scorezor]

To reproduce obviously,

But let's say he made some people gay to not let the world overpopulate ... why wouldn't you believe that?


What I already said, the people who were born gay didn't make the choice.

i can't believe in that , bc if he did created at first those 2 beings , that means that the world can't just stop "overpopulate".

 

[Wolfus]

What if God didn't create woman? What if God is gay?

What if God isn't real.... Oh my gessssh oh my gosh

And what if you people put your pointless religious fights aside for a momment. Like, forever?
You people are like kids. "Ah, god is real" "No, he is not, you're a ***g*t for believing it, dumb" "lol, yes he is, you're evil".

Maybe you shouldn't Google as much, it is really poisonous to the mind that isn't ready.

Like I said and will remain to say, you can't calculate something that has seemingly random variables, such as whether or not a child raised by gay parents will become gay, since according to the gays, it's not a choice.

You can calculate the %, as the % doesn't indicate the fact, but the probability of hit happening, and that would be based on the exemples of the facts that already happened, as the % for it not happening would cover the other variables, that if they got a lower %, they would be so important as the one we're discussing.

 

[Bubbles The Powerpuff Girl]

Actually, the number of people in western countries is decreasing. On the contrary, the number of imigrants (mainly from middle east) in those countries is getting higher and higher.

Exactly.

Now what would happen if the same exact event happened in the developing countries? Mass perdition of human race.

 

[Turson]

That's another problem I won't talk about on this thread . :O

Yep, thats topic for another discussion, Im just gonna say that Im afraid that in not so distant future we shall witness new era of religious wars in wester Europe. Western societies have become way too soft.

 

[Namikun]

Yep, thats topic for another discussion, Im just gonna say that Im afraid that in not so distant future we shall witness new era of religious wars in wester Europe. Western societies have become way too soft.

I'm a 100% sure this WILL happen one day, mainly because of the muslim immigration becoming larger and larger.. but let's try to not start a war on this thread about that. :O

 

[Skylar Knight]

Hating on gay marriage is like getting angry that others eat food that you don't like. They're human too, for God's sake, so let them do what they want. If they go against God and his words, then so what? Let them go to hell for what they believed in then. It's not that hard.

 

[Wolfus]

Yep, thats topic for another discussion, Im just gonna say that Im afraid that in not so distant future we shall witness new era of religious wars in wester Europe. Western societies have become way too soft.

I fear that as well. If people don't grow up and stop these pointless arguments about religion, one trying to blame the other, just as kids, one day, it will cease to be oral only, and it will start to get very physical.

I can see it by the behavior of some atheists, those that think all religious people are dumb and think that they are stupid and the core of the problems, thefore they should get killed.
This is a big problem.
Or the gay moralists, thinking that insulting and fighting religious people(happened in my country, not so long ago) will get them what they want.
Or the religious fanatics, that kills for their gods.

It will happen again. And again, the fault is not of religion itself. We woudl be the ones to blame, with our inability to respect and to live with differences, and our fighting for pointless reasons nature.

 

[ShishaMastah420]

We are able to calculate the % of kids raised by gay parents turning gay based on the total % of kids that turned gay rasied by gay parents considering the toal of kids raised by gay parents.

Of course there are other reasons for people turning gay or gathering any other idea. But the parents behavior is a very important factor, as what the parents teach the kids is a factor as well.

I don't know what's with these hippies ignoring % "oh numbers tell nothing, this is not math, lol".

That first sentence you wrote might have sound good in your head but It don't make sense, all your calculating is the amount of kids that are gay with gay parents... Lmao what about the actual variable your trying to convince me of here, what about the increase of gay children due to the increase of gay parenting? How do you calculate whether a child is going to be gay because of his/her parents?

Here's a lil hoodwink, Narutos Dad was an over all genius and his mom a sealing master, can you find me a variable that answers why Naruto is an idiot with no sealing techniques(besides toriii)


P.S imma Hippie now? Lmao

 

[Momochifanboy]

I am okey whit gay marrige as long as they stay away from me.

 

[Scorpio0Pharaoh0Titan]

Here we go again...

No. I'm not against it... why should I be? It's a natural re-occurring relationship that is found within other species - not just humans, for very unique purposes.

Not going to delve into this matter more than necessary on the NB forums - if you want to learn more, just private message me and we can chat further... but suffice to say, homosexual relationships occurred in our own human history - the greeks did it, the egyptians did it, the spanish did it, almost every civilization that thrived in some aspect had citizens who commonly practised what you guys see as an "aberration".

Homosexual marriage can serve many purposes - to further unite or intensify the bond between two people who commonly share an emotional pact with one another.

Homosexual ACTS, on the other hand, can vary from being seen as needed vs. unneeded.
In greek civilization, homosexual acts were used as a form of payment by the younger to the older in return for mentorship, which the father of the younger man approved of. This allowed for citizens of society to be "connected" with the customs and be up-to-date on the latest advances in society - to help them with social and economic growth.

However, in spartan history, homosexual acts was frowned upon. If you were penetrated by another man (if you were a man) then you were seen as weak. It was done to exert dominance.

Basically, homosexuality in and of itself isn't a "sin" as there are many male-to-male "loving" relationships that occur for important reasons. Whether homosexual "acts" are incorporated within these homosexual relationships remains no concern to any of us. As long as it doesn't lower the dignity of a human being, then it is safe to say that a man having *** with a man because he loves the other man emotionally and thus, wants to express it in a physical form is no different than if it were a woman who was doing it to the man for the same exact reason. No different should this be with marriage.

 

[Namikun]

I fear that as well. If people don't grow up and stop these pointless arguments about religion, one trying to blame the other, just as kids, one day, it will cease to be oral only, and it will start to get very physical.

It's too late already.. I think it's unavoidable right now.