[Debate] Are The Big Bang Theory & God Theory Intertwined?

[Legendary Saiyan]

You're saying I have no scientific knowledge DUDE I WON'T EVEN SAY YOU'RE WRONG :lol:

No I wasn't directing it towards you. The idiom was meant for who you quoted to.

 

[Deadlift]

Lmfao believing in God is more rational than believing in the Big Bang Theory

 

[HashiraMadara]

No I wasn't directing it towards you. The idiom was meant for who you quoted to.

That makes sense :lol:

 

[Alien X]

Imaginary things will always remain as such, someday when humanty achieves "true" power they will stop believing in these time wasters.

The big bang theory proposes a small chance of truth, astrophysics states that this 4th dimensional universe is merely 13.7 billion years. However that goes only for the "observable" universe, which is 28 billion parsecs in diameter and still rising against nothing.

 

[Marin]

Indeed they are. The one who concieved the Big Bang Theory was a Catholic priest who came up with it as a way to explain how God created this world.

I find it ironic how atheists claim it to be refutation of God's existence and how religious refuse to accept it as they think atheists invented it as a way to refute God. :xD:

 

[SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO]

The Singularity of the Big Bang directly comes from the math of General Relativity, but it can only predict and explain what comes after, not before the said Singularity, to escape metaphysical defeat, some cling to the idea of a Multiverse, same with the MWI of QM, it is ultimately unfalsifiable, but it is the only alternative left to the First Cause which itself is not caused, Hugh Everett knew about this, it is his sole recourse in escaping total annihilation through Quantum Immortality, but in the end it gave him no true comfort and he died a broken man, his daughter took her life years later and in her final letter she hoped she would meet her father in an parallel universe.

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

You clearly have no scientific knowledge.

1 proton floating around is a subatomic but as well a H+ or a.k.a a hydrogen ion
2 protons joined floating around = He+ a helium ion etc...


Your sh*t made me LMAO

The Big Bang initially produced particles such as quarks, which later formed protons and neutrons when the universe cooled down iirc.

 

[Deadlift]

Indeed they are. The one who concieved the Big Bang Theory was a Catholic priest who came up with it as a way to explain how God created this world.

I find it ironic how atheists claim it to be refutation of God's existence and how religious refuse to accept it as they think atheists invented it as a way to refute God. :xD:

BIg Bang Theory has still lots of thing that are yet to be proven. Said this, it hasn't that much to do with God, it doesn't explain the cause and the mote, since it has been said that the "nothing" before the Big Bang was moving energy, that still needs a cause that put into move. So it's just a ring more in the chain, it doesn't prove or disprove God

 

[NarutoKage2]

But that is the only answer. God has always existed and always will thats what it says. What kind of answer would be acceptable to explain an omnipotent, omniscient being? Any explanation will always require an explanation for the explanation and so on.

Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive traits.

It isn't an answer, as history can attest. Its running away from the responsibility to even find an answer.

 

[HashiraMadara]

The Big Bang initially produced particles such as quarks, which later formed protons and neutrons when the universe cooled down iirc.

Big bang produced hadrons(hydrogen protons etc), leptons(electrons, quarks..) etc... Then few joined to make He+ and Li+ after a few seconds

 

[Itachi Minato]

Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive traits.

It isn't an answer, as history can attest. Its running away from the responsibility to even find an answer.

They are not mutually exclusive. Why cant god be all powerful and all knowing ?
Like I said an explanation for God would require an explanation for that explanation and etc. Its just a mind**** of a question in my opinion

 

[Claymantan]

The universe had to be created by an intelligent being (God).. In my opinion, there's no way all of this came from nothing.

But that is the only answer. God has always existed and always will thats what it says. What kind of answer would be acceptable to explain an omnipotent, omniscient being? Any explanation will always require an explanation for the explanation and so on.

The Singularity of the Big Bang directly comes from the math of General Relativity, but it can only predict and explain what comes after, not before the said Singularity, to escape metaphysical defeat, some cling to the idea of a Multiverse, same with the MWI of QM, it is ultimately unfalsifiable, but it is the only alternative left to the First Cause which itself is not caused, Hugh Everett knew about this, it is his sole recourse in escaping total annihilation through Quantum Immortality, but in the end it gave him no true comfort and he died a broken man, his daughter took her life years later and in her final letter she hoped she would meet her father in an parallel universe.

You must be registered for see images

(user takes no stance on this debate)

 

[NarutoKage2]

They are not mutually exclusive. Why cant god be all powerful and all knowing ?
Like I said an explanation for God would require an explanation for that explanation and etc. Its just a mind**** of a question in my opinion

I'm afraid they are.

Can an omniscient God find the omnipotence to change his future mind?
If he can, he's not omniscient. If he can't, he's not omnipotent.

There is an infinite regress 'prior' to the singularity that caused the big bang, and no explanation is immune to this regress, including an explanation invoking god.