Stop being ignorant. Skin color, hair texture, facial structure, athletic differences(such as west african distance runners), average height, average body fat, body hair growth. we are actually more different than we are alike, but that doesn't fit into your world view of false equality
the dominant race in all of those countries are white people. you're ****ing ignorant if you believe they exist in harmony as equals and one group doesn't preform traditionally worse overall.
the sizable jewish minority in the U.S. are actually over achievers and are a prime example of dominance i've spoken of. The difference being you placed jews outside of the realm of white where i didn't. obviously the farther you break it down the less the differences.
What i'm talking about are overall racial averages.
Th democrats are socialists having to work in a pre constructed democracy
the republicans are fascists having to work around the same. The democracy is being taken down piece by piece but stop kidding yourself by thinking that if they could at once claim power they wouldn't
It has nothing to do with 'false equality' and I honestly find it somewhat laughable that you would make this assumption based on what I wrote.
You must be registered for see links
There are most certainly differences between people, but your concept of race hardly seems to extend further than skin color. You are simply not correct in your assumption that we are more different than we are alike. It sounds like some 19th century eugenics hogwash and you should, honestly, make an effort to do some reading on this.
Uh, yeah, some groups have performed worse in some societies. Australian Aboriginals, Inuit groups, Native Americans, African Americans, various South American natives... all have underperformed versus the ethnic majority in things such as education, rate of employment, median household income, etc.
You should read
World on Fire by Amy Chua. She describes what she calls 'market-dominant ethnic minorities' around the world. White settlers and Boer people in South Africa, Chinese entrepreneurs in Thailand and other South-East Asian nations, Lebanese groups across North Africa and the Middle-East, and Jewish (particularly Ashkenazi groups) in many Western countries.
...and so what? I mean, most of the indigenous peoples of the New World were disadvantaged by law and experienced institutional racism that just outright prevented them from competing with European settlers. In Spanish-controlled territories you had an integrated racial hierarchy (
You must be registered for see links
). I am not saying that all these groups exist in harmony, what I am saying is that there are no 'racial' reasons why some groups have underperformed. There is simply no historical evidence to support this.
I mean, racial averages? What are you even talking about? You Americans and your race-issues. You act like it's just Black, White, Asian, Indian and Native American. Ethnic groups have migrated and interbred for countless generations and you talk about racial averages? As if a Spaniard and a Norwegian person has the same 'phenotype' and as if this somehow affects their damn PISA score. Wake up.
And you are simply wrong about the parties. It is simply not a debate; you are just wrong. A google search will tell you that. Everyone who is not a tinfoil-wearing nutjob will tell you that.
