American Republic

[InfiniteMugen]

They're all corrupt are we now going to accept them to do it in front of our faces and be quiet about it while politicians keep us busy fighting against each other

No, I'm not trying to excuse anybody here, im just saying some people should seriously educate themselves on both candidates, not just what they see on tv, before grabbing their pitchforks and torches

 

[BLAZE]

I agree, it just seems crazy to me that the people screaming no to trump don't have the foggiest clue about what Hillary is actually all about

i believe they were saying vote for lesser Evil.
tbh don't see how hillary is lesser of 2 evils lmao

 

[kimb]

several new republican supreme court justices you say? Who exactly would they be?

The answers are still in the air. Trump did release a list of potential canidates back in may; "Steven Colloton of Iowa, Allison Eid of Colorado, Raymond Gruender of Missouri, Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania, Raymond Kethledge of Michigan, Joan Larsen of Michigan, Thomas Lee of Utah, William Pryor of Alabama, David Stras of Minnesota, Diane Sykes of Wisconsin and Don Willett of Texas." Who he picks, no one really knows, but he's able to replace two S.C.J., which will definitely change the outlook on what laws get passed.

Who knows, they might still being going through an identity crisis. Also, I'm sure they would oppose Trump if it looks good for their election.

True, the GOP wasn't really backing him up during this entire election. We might see a similar situation to what Obama experienced when he struggled to get his laws and polices passed by congress. That's a good thing; Trump can't **** up the country, unless congress allows it lol.

 

[Sagebee]

No, I'm not trying to excuse anybody here, im just saying some people should seriously educate themselves on both candidates, not just what they see on tv, before grabbing their pitchforks and torches

No one likes or trusts hillary I think in general people know she's corrupt too, but the answer for those who dont like corruption isnt to pick the head of corruptiob instead of its middle man

 

[InfiniteMugen]

i believe they were saying vote for lesser Evil.
tbh don't see how hillary is lesser of 2 evils lmao

I don't either tbh. She had some decent ideas but the decent ones just seemed like lip service. On the surface she seems like the better candidate, but in reality she's just another dodgy politician... hot sauce in her bag? Who the f ck was that for? Foh

 

[InfiniteMugen]

No one likes or trusts hillary I think in general people know she's corrupt too, but the answer for those who dont like corruption isnt to pick the head of corruptiob instead of its middle man

Yea but you can't straight up say trumps a corrupt politician yet. Who knows, maybe by gods good graces he'll take this seriously.... maybe... fingers crossed lol

 

[BLAZE]

Yea but you can't straight up say trumps a corrupt politician yet. Who knows, maybe by gods good graces he'll take this seriously.... maybe... fingers crossed lol

But then again now u have the guy who is willing to give Saudi Arabia nukes so lel

 

[Sagebee]

Yea but you can't straight up say trumps a corrupt politician yet. Who knows, maybe by gods good graces he'll take this seriously.... maybe... fingers crossed lol

Yeah we can hope but like I said look who he has in his team is the worst of the worst

 

[InfiniteMugen]

But then again now u have the guy who is willing to give Saudi Arabia nukes so lel

True, we could quite possibly be avoiding war with Russia and pissing off the rest of the world kun:

Yeah we can hope but like I said look who he has in his team is the worst of the worst

This i completely agree with, the people he's wanting to appoint are horrible choices

 

[chopstickchakra]

The answers are still in the air. Trump did release a list of potential canidates back in may; "Steven Colloton of Iowa, Allison Eid of Colorado, Raymond Gruender of Missouri, Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania, Raymond Kethledge of Michigan, Joan Larsen of Michigan, Thomas Lee of Utah, William Pryor of Alabama, David Stras of Minnesota, Diane Sykes of Wisconsin and Don Willett of Texas." Who he picks, no one really knows, but he's able to replace two S.C.J., which will definitely change the outlook on what laws get passed.




True, the GOP wasn't really backing him up during this entire election. We might see a similar situation to what Obama experienced when he struggled to get his laws and polices passed by congress. That's a good thing; Trump can't **** up the country, unless congress allows it lol.

I thought only one SCJ seat was open and once elected your in until you step down, this replacing concept is new to me. He can try to add more but he can't replace the existing ones. Also changes to the size are historically driven by population so trying to justify adding members when 9 has worked this long with no great influx of population would be a hard sell, plus the fact that it's been 9 members since 1869 make it highly unlikely this will even happen. I'm curious though is this something Trump's said or what people are saying he'll do?