Is this the first time you see the true image of America? Not specifically talking about the citizens, but its government and military are criminals.
-The Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb.
-The Vietnam war.
-The Afghanistan and Iraq war during 1990s.
-9/11 which is supported by the science evidences that the government was behind it, as well as their suspicion of shutting down the investigation.
-Iraq war 2003: Weapons of Mass Destruction cover-up, and real intent is stealing the natural resources of Iraq.
Not just the terrorism genocide, robbing; the discrimination against black people, which still happens to this day. Not just that, their citizens are dumb and brainwashed. It has the highest crime rates, most dangerous drug smugglers and prisoners.
American is not the Land of Opportunity and all those propaganda lies; it doesn't live up for those titles.
I highly disagree with the military being criminals. Even though I have not shipped yet for training I can still state a very true opinion on your statement.
One of our general orders as US Marines is to take upon an order than is given to us and carry it out. It's an honest job to protect america from harm as you would your family if they were harmed.
Half of that is arguable, though. Majority of those wars were for logical reasons.
9/11 was a big reasoning for going to war with Iraq as Saddam was sponsoring terrorism, anyway.
Since there was no direct connection between Osama bin Laden and Saddam, take away the security apprehensions following 9/11, and George Bush probably would not have taken the risk of invading Iraq. By the same token, had the 1991 Gulf War ended differently, or had the U.N. and the NATO allies continued to participate fully in the no-fly zones and the containment of Iraq, there likewise would not have been a 2003 invasion. The Iraq War was predicated, rightly or wrongly, on the notion that the past war with Saddam had failed and containment would fail, and that after 9/11 it was the proper time to end a sponsor of global terrorism that should have been ended in 1991 — a decision that, incidentally, would save Kurdistan and allow it to turn into one of the most successful and pro-American regions in the Middle East.
As for the bombing,
It was a tough decision for Truman to bomb Japan .Critics have charged that Truman's decision was a barbaric act that brought negative long-term consequences to the United States. A new age of nuclear terror led to a dangerous arms race. Some military analysts insist that Japan was on its knees and the bombings were simply unnecessary. The American government was accused of racism on the grounds that such a device would never have been used against white civilians,
but Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military.
A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President. Over 3,500 Japanese kamikaze raids had already wrought great destruction and loss of American lives.
Truman rejected a demonstration of the atomic bomb to the Japanese leadership. He knew there was no guarantee the Japanese would surrender if the test succeeded, and he felt that a failed demonstration would be worse than none at all. Even the scientific community failed to foresee the awful effects of RADIATION SICKNESS. Truman saw little difference between atomic bombing Hiroshima and FIRE BOMBING Dresden or Tokyo.
The bombs did, however, bring an end to the most destructive war in history. The Manhattan Project that produced it demonstrated the possibility of how a nation's resources could be mobilized.
I mean, I could go on and on, but that's just wrong to accuse the military. We are taking out orders, we don't make them.