- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Messages
- 38,776
- Reaction score
- 2,272
1.So the realm argument shouldn't be used from me or KG65, and not just me, correct?
Except you are using the realm argument to prove that despite being smaller in size, they were at full size, but his post clearly shows you can't use that argument. It has no bearing on my argument which is only comparing their full size and nothing else. So unless that wasn't their full size in Naruto's mind, my argument is unaffected.
Lol what?
Avatar Kurama has matching paw prints to 100 Kurama, fact.
50 Kurama doesn't, fact.
Even if you decide to dance around the premise of location argument, the other point trashes this.
No proof for anything you said. Just more garbage. Not even interested in your location argument as scans already show that the Bijuu are the same size as Half Kurama, and are the same size as the Avatar. Use your brain and put the pieces together.
Proof that being specific removal changes outcome.
Not even gonna bother as the End of Day's post shits on this part of your argument.
@Bold Proof?
This.
You must be registered for see images
Or this.
You must be registered for see images
Are you going to dance around these scans every time they are posted instead of actually replying to them? lmao. Pathetic.
Scans show that Half Kurama is equal to the full sized Bijuu and that the Avatar is also equal to them in size. Sorry pal. You make no sense.
Just admit that you have been talking out of your ass this whole thread.