[Discussion] a question regarding libertarianism

Division Bell

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
what is there to prevent a libertarian nation from degenerating into various lawless feudal kingdoms?
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
329
Reaction score
26
libertarianism is the shit yo. There is no other way, liberals and conservatives are both stupid. Everyone has the right to do WHATEVER they want including smoking weed and shooting up smack as they see fit as long as it doesn't hurt or effect anyone else in a negative way but themselves.
 

YowYan

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
15,124
Reaction score
1,838
You could've just asked this question on your other thread. The topic is pretty much on par
 

Scooby Doo

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Immortal
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
45,490
Reaction score
1,676
Libertarianism does not say that law and government are not necessary at all. Only some extremists/anarchists say.
 
Last edited:

cptenn94

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2,779
Reaction score
274
Libertarianism does not say that law and government are not necessary at all. Only some extremists/anarchists say.

Even the extremists for libertarians and right wing, dont think that law and government are not neccesary at all.

Pretty much the anarchists are the ones who think that there should be no government.(and of course a minute number of crazies)


Simply put though, most liberatarians, who know anything about what they believe, do NOT think there should be no government. They just believe it should be smaller.
 

Aim64C

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
608
what is there to prevent a libertarian nation from degenerating into various lawless feudal kingdoms?

A population that embraces the notions of a Constitutionally limited Representative government that is allowed to arm itself.

If any State were to attempt to usurp its own Constitution amidst declaring itself independent of the Nation, there would be considerable amounts of armed rebellion. How such a thing could occur without immense popular support, I have no idea - but assuming the majority were simply complacent in the whole ordeal...

Ultimately, the Nation would be able to offer support to the citizenry to restore a Constitutional government.

Libertarian ideals hold that the individual is responsible for his/her life. It is our responsibility to ensure the government plays as big or as little of a role in our life as we feel it should (for Libertarians - that generally means the government be kept to as minor of a necessary evil as possible). It also means we are responsible for setting it straight when it oversteps its bounds or when some other force threatens the system or way of life that we currently live by and enjoy.

The proper question you should be asking is this: "What ensures the people of a nation will abide by its rules?"

There you will find the dangers of allowing small groups of people to make new rules, and the dangers of restricting the behavior and property of private citizens. History is littered with the skeletons of men and women crushed beneath the weight of an empire that would deny them everything but debt and service.
 
Top